Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Anthomyiidae sp 2.jpg

Reason: Quite tiny. Good lighting and clear pose. Has an id to species level~~, but genus/species articles don't currently exist~~. Re nomination because last time it was just a discussion about scale bars.
Articles this image appears in: Anthomyiidae
Creator: Noodle snacks

Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 07:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There isn't a white balance difference between this and the image below. I thought so too, but turns out to be different stages of flowering. Noodle snacks (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Previous nomination. MER-C 08:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ support as before. Scale bar is missing --Muhammad(talk) 10:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Was before to do with size? Noodle snacks (talk) 06:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? Weird, I thought I created the species article a long time ago? Zoo Fari 04:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I remember looking at them too. Noodle snacks (talk) 06:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question Where's the scale bar (per caption) and is there a reason this nom has to have one? If this is a requirement, how are we deciding an image needs one? --mikaul^talk 01:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I just copied the old nomination lock stock and barrel. It had been removed from this image. The scale bar was the principle reason it didn't pass last time. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Zoo Fari 04:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great detail and sharpness, good EV and composition. Good riddance to the scale bar :) Kaldari (talk) 23:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Anthomyiidae sp.jpg --jjron (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]