Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Cracticus tibicen hypoleuca male domain.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2010 at 08:48:20 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 08:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Good, but I think we can do better than this photo of a Magpie, given how common they are in Australia. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 11:16, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. The quality's there, but the background's not ideal, and, though the EV is clear now, I question how long it will stay in the taxobox. The article seems to chop and change images a lot. J Milburn (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The last image (of a juvenile) I added is still there (1 year). Noodle snacks (talk) 00:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems to exceed minimums and the feathers are nice and glossy. --I'ḏ ♥One 17:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I can't help but think this isn't the best we could do for this bird. Also I have found myself whilst looking at this picture trying to work out what the background is, which is not a good thing. JFitch (talk) 21:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Miburn. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really catching. Sorry Hive001 contact 18:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 10:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]