Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Evania appendigaster.jpg

Evania appendigaster[edit]

Reason: DOF, lighting and good EV. Black insects are usually much harder to photography correctly but IMO this one turned out quite good. The white setting is natural as I usually find them on walls.
Articles this image appears in: Evaniidae, Evanioidea
Creator: Muhammad

Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 19:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment and question. Needs to be rotated. Is the abdomen on top of the wing or underneath? It's a bit hard to tell from the photo. Kaldari (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Abdomen on top of the wings. Why rotate? it was slanted in reality. --Muhammad(talk) 06:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think rotating to horizontal would improve the composition, although I suppose it's a matter of taste. Is it normal for the abdomen to be sitting on top of the wings? It seems rather strange, but I don't know much about the species. Kaldari (talk) 23:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot (i even like the tilt of the ground, makes for a more original composition). However, I've some trouble figuring out what are the black things on top of the wings ? Ksempac (talk) 11:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not sure what you are referring to but I think it may be the abdomen. --Muhammad(talk) 12:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The anal and vannal veins (part of the wing structure)? Zoo Fari 23:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Tilt is ok. Nicely done, don't see any issues. Maedin\^talk 17:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Tilt doesn't bother me either. Good isolation of the subject while keeping the environment natural. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 19:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support No problem with tilt. Dirty surface is a bit distracting. It's good quality, but not as good as some of your others have been. Makeemlighter (talk) 22:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Evania appendigaster.jpg --wadester 16 19:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]