Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Great cormorant in flight.jpg

Support as nominator --Fir0002 14:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support great capture. Durova³⁰⁶ 21:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per Durova. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's good, but I am supporting it because it needs a third vote to reach quorum, not because of anything special. Nezzadar (talk) 03:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose well timed, but almost nothing is in sharp focus. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not sure it has it's best EV at great cormorant, I would have thougth Bird flight would be more appropriate and it is certainly of a comparable quality to the other FP's on that page, for which it might be nice to have an idea of what phase of flight it was in (although with Fir leaving we might never know).Terri G (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't mind so much about the wing tips, but the base of the wing is really messed up as well. Probably just unlucky, but since FP is a binary operation, I come out opposing. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 15:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Staxringold _talk^contribs 04:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]