Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Stream Uluguru Mountains.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stream Uluguru Mountains[edit]

Original - Creek at the Uluguru Mountains which joins to form the Ruvu river.
Reason
Good quality and EV. Illustrates the Uluguru Mountains very well.
Articles this image appears in
Stream, Uluguru Mountains
Creator
Muhammad Mahdi Karim
  • Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 02:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I don't think it readily illustrates stream, the low viewpoint makes it look more like a tiny waterfall than the textbook definition of stream. On a side issue - holy crap the Stream article is ripe for a cleanup of images, it has way too many and a lot of them really cover other water features better than the article title. But getting back to this image, I am also left feeling it is a bit of a stretch to say it illustrates Uluguru mountains well as it doesn't really include enough context to place it there. It really looks like a great many places not even limiting it to one continent let alone a set of mountains, as the rocks and trees are not particularly unusual. Maybe this one is just not a very FP subject. Mfield (Oi!) 02:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, nice picture, but doesn't seem particularly encyclopedic. J Milburn (talk) 17:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Agree, lacking EV. Sasata (talk) 19:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I can agree with the above, and would add that the central problem would be that stream means different things depending where you are in the English-speaking world (and hence, anywhere, since it's not obvious which definition should apply to any given foreign country...). Possible that this can never be resolved based on Reliable Sources. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, EV issues. Pretty picture though. And again, both Stream and Uluguru Mountains articles already have plenty of good pictures (the latter one by you). --Dschwen 14:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 03:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]