Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Two-point-equidistant-asia.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2014 at 11:46:29 (UTC)

Reason: one of the best projections of Asia
Articles in which this image appears: NASA
FP category for this image: link to category (listed on the WP:FP page) that best describes the image
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator --Herald talk with me 11:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, but I may be missing something here. For such a massive thing (two a bit continents...) the resolution's actually pretty low. The colours also seem unrealistic; Siberian tundra isn't well known for being green, and there are urban areas that would be big enough to show up as a different colour, rather than the flat green we see here. The image page lacks sufficient sourcing information, and the EV in NASA doesn't seem enormous. J Milburn (talk) 12:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per J Milburn. For something as easy to find as this, it should be very easy to get a vastly better image. Mattximus (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — How does this image add anything to the sum total of human knowledge? Sca (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]