Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian orb weaver.jpg

Reason: High quality image with pleasingly soft lighting of a Australian Garden Orb Weaver
Articles this image appears in: Australian garden orb weaver spider, Spider
Creator: Fir0002

Support as nominator --Fir0002 01:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support -- Several legs aren't in good focus, but otherwise a beautiful image. She almost looks cute. From a distance. Fletcher (talk) 03:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Legs not completely in focus would be okay, but quite a bit of the body isn't as well. Capital photographer (talk) 09:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not much in focus, leaf is distracting. Noodle snacks (talk) 14:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Noodle. Much of it's out of focus. Ɔrassic ^(talk) 22:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Capital.Greener Cactus (talk) 19:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support to oppose those who oppose per those who oppose </sarcasm Seriously though, this is a weak oppose (as if the modifier actually matters) since it does have it's flaw however it is still overall a good image and very encyclopedic which is the main benchmark for an enwiki nom, if this were commons then it would be the other way around with it all being a beauty contest but since this is enwiki my vote reflects as such. Cat-five - talk 04:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 06:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]