Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Airplane vortex edit.jpg

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wake Vortex Study at Wallops Flight Facility[edit]

The air flow from the wing of this agricultural plane is made visible by a technique that uses colored smoke rising from the ground.
Edit by trialsanderrors — Color corrected, noise reduced, cropped, downsampled.
Reason
I believe that the image's quality is too low for an FA, it's FAC (Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wingtip vortex) I feel didn't have that much support either.
Nominator
→AzaToth
  • Delist — →AzaToth 03:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist. Very interesting image, but the graininess is unacceptable --frothT 03:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unless alternative can be found. It's a stunning image! Yes, it's grainy in full size, but that full size is almost 3000 px! Downsample and you have much less grain... --Janke | Talk 08:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    If you check the 800x600 version of the image, it's still really grainy. →AzaToth 13:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unless alternative can be found. Amazing image. —Pengo 14:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Featured picture critera specify:
    A featured picture:
    1. Is of high quality. It is sharp and of pleasing colour balance, contrast and brightness, free of compression artifacts (such as in highly packed JPEG files), burned-out highlights, image noise ("graininess"), and other distracting factors.
      • Typically, the only exception to this rule is in the case of one-of-a-kind historical images. If it can reasonably be considered impossible to find a higher-quality image of a given subject, low quality may sometimes be allowed. For example, this image of the Battle of Normandy is grainy, but very few pictures of that event exist. NASA has a surplus collection of high-quality images, so a poor picture of the moon landing would not be accepted given that many others are available.
  • Keep High enc value. --Arad 21:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • question is "high enc value" a reason to ignore §1 of the featured picture criteria? →AzaToth 13:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's all subjective. Find a better quality, free license image of a vortex like this, and we can have that as a FP, while this is delisted. Simple as that... ;-) --Janke | Talk 09:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • I think you have mistaken what a FP is, a vortex is not a "one-of-a-kind historical image", thus it shouldn't be able to except §1 in the criteria. →AzaToth 10:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
          • I think most people don't understand the FP criteria. It's a guideline. It's there to guide you what we expect from FPs. It's not Wikipedia's absolute rule. There is always exeptions to it. So as stated above it's subjective. Get a btter image and we gladly delist this one. This is IMHO --Arad 18:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yes. The criteria themselves say that encyclopedic value is more important than artistic value. -- Cyrius|✎ 19:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Tomer T 11:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - wonderful illustration of the subject. Complaining about graininess in this image is like complaining about seeing the brush strokes in a Monet. -- Cyrius|✎ 19:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit? I don't have much problem with the grain, but the turquoise background is garish and the picture needs to be cropped at the bottom. I might give it a shot later. ~ trialsanderrors 22:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I added my version. I'm neutral on this nomination. ~ trialsanderrors 19:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -Nelro

Kept MER-C 02:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/Airplane_vortex_edit.jpg&oldid=114211168"