Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/City hall london.jpg

City Hall, London

Reason: Does not meet size requirements - It's only 450 x 600. Also, there are blown out highlights and the subject is cut off.
Nominator: Mahahahaneapneap

Delist — Mahahahaneapneap 15:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist definitely way too small -Wutschwlllm 00:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Pity it doesn't meet the requirements.... it is a beautiful shot of a beautiful building. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 08:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - yup, good call. Was featured when the requirements were a lot less strict. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 11:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist: Under size requirements. —sd31415 (sign here) 11:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Sad to see too since the image is very nice. — Arjun 20:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Well I guess we are on patrol for small pictures!! Looks like they had bad weather that night (or at least it was a little foggy).--¿Why 1 9 9 1 ^{ESP. | Sign Here} 02:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Because the author was not informed, the only reason is the size, otherwise a very good photo. I though we were over this, as there was another nomination, based only on size that failed. Until we don't get a response from the creator, we don't have to remove this image from FP statue. --Arad 04:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with you that as a matter of courtesy it would be nice if the nominator/creator were warned however most nominations go through delisting without notifying the person so it's not really needed though it would be nice. Cat-five - talk 11:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To nominator: Please inform the author of the nomination and ask him, if possible, to provide a higher resolution.
Delist on size and quality grounds, the size is way too low and the blown out lighting are an issue though I can live with the cutoff of part of the building. Cat-five - talk 11:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted - I asked the photographer, ChrisO, for a higher res version on the 4th of December but he hasn't replied yet. If he can provide a larger image it can always be nominated again. Raven4x4x 06:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]