Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Characters of Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow and Dawn of Sorrow/archive1
Appearance
Characters of Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow and Dawn of Sorrow
[edit]Note that this was a Good Topics nomination - rst20xx (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Main page | Articles |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Nominating this with the caveat that Soma Cruz and Alucard (Castlevania) be removed from the Aria of Sorrow topic to avoid unnecessary overlap. The Aria of Sorrow topic would still be comprehensive due to having the character list (which in turn lists Soma and Alucard, making their inclusion in the topic unnecessary). As for this topic, it is complete (as all other characters are non-notable and shouldn't have articles written on them) and all articles/lists are of featured or good status. sephiroth bcr (converse) 20:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The AoS topic seems perfectly fine to me as it is, I don't see a compelling reason to split it up into two topics. Pagrashtak 21:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose: I agree with Pagrashtak. The AoS topic is fine as it is and splitting would go against the fourth WP:FT? recommendation, "needlessly small". No need to mess with a good thing, and at 60% featured, the AoS topic is well above others. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC))
- Oppose - 100% overlapped by the parent FT, and I see no compelling reason why the articles should be broken out into their own topic without adding any new articles. --PresN (talk) 21:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sorry, but I have to agree with the above comments. Trying to break out a subtopic from such a small topic seems totally unfruitful. Rreagan007 (talk) 21:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - meh, well I had to try. Can someone withdraw this nomination? I'll try next with another idea. Cheers, sephiroth bcr (converse) 21:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - this clearly constitutes oversplitting. It's not a competition to see who can get the most topics - rst20xx (talk) 23:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Withdrawn - rst20xx (talk) 00:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)