Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 August 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 12

Uploaded by Hkvpprincess (notify | contribs). Blatant advertising. Blu3d 10:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Capix (notify | contribs). Game/web screenshot, only used in a deleted spam article Capix Advanced Warfare (and its now removed copy added by the same user to List of free MMORPGs). Marked as {{GFDL-self}} - the game isn't GFDL-licensed, is it? - Mike Rosoft 13:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by G. Moore (notify | contribs). CV. This image is from 1940 and thus was not published before 1923. BigDT 14:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Nrahamthulla (notify | contribs). WP:NOR BigDT 16:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Danny-w (notify | contribs). The source is Hebrew Wikipedia, but the he description page [1] is empty. BigDT 16:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Danny-w (notify | contribs). Source of image is Hebrew Wikipedia. I can't read Hebrew, but the uploader translated the licensing information as being educational and non-commercial only. This is incompatible with Wikipedia, but rather than asking for it to be speedied, I wanted to bring it here in case the original uploader on he has revised their copyright information. BigDT 16:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Danny-w (notify | contribs). "The permission was given to a fair use and mentioning of their site." This implies that it is a "by permission only" image. BigDT 16:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: the uploader has removed the ifd tag and provided additional information [2]. However, the additional information does not provide an acceptable license. "It is written in hebrew [3] that it was taken with permision from the israeli site "MyPet" [4]. The permision was given to a fair use." BigDT 12:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by DWPeltier3 (notify | contribs). OR, OB by Image:Seedsmoke.jpg- — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Absecon 59 (notify | contribs). OR, scanning a record does not give you rights to it and thus, this image is a CV BigDT 16:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEPWell, in what circumstances DO we have the right to show what a certain record, tape, CD, laserdisc, etc. looks like? Would it still be a CV if I took a picture of the record with a digital camera? According to this definition, it would be illegal to take a picture of just about anything produced by a corporation. My guess is that any copyright of the record refers to the actual recording on it, which I of course did not reproduce. Absecon 59 14:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Larfthemovie (notify | contribs). OR, AU insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 16:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Larfthemovie (notify | contribs). OR, AU, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 17:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jabe88 (notify | contribs). OR, summary is "Fair use photo," tag is GFDL-self. Does not compute BigDT 17:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jabe88 (notify | contribs). I can't find the exact image, but [5] says that their images all come from somewhere else, so this one is probably not free. BigDT 17:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jabe88 (notify | contribs). I can't find the exact image, but [6] says that their images all come from somewhere else, so this one is probably not free. BigDT 17:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jabe88 (notify | contribs). I can't find the exact image, but [7] says that their images all come from somewhere else, so this one is probably not free. BigDT 17:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jabe88 (notify | contribs). I can't find the exact image, but [8] says that their images all come from somewhere else, so this one is probably not free. BigDT 17:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jabe88 (notify | contribs). I can't find the exact image, but [9] says that their images all come from somewhere else, so this one is probably not free. BigDT 17:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jabe88 (notify | contribs). Probably from fairouz.com like all of these others and probably also not free. BigDT 17:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Capitanpickel (notify | contribs). OR, UE, presumably uploaded for a deleted article BigDT 17:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). OR, An upper case J, 10x14, too small to be useful for anything BigDT 17:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I was unable to notify the uploader because he/she has been blocked. BigDT 17:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I e-mailed BigDT asking him to post a reply for me, but received no response. So, I am posting it here. Please do not remove it. The image in question has been used in the article about the letter. (See "j.") The material I added to that article is in the public domain. I offered indisputable proof of that fact.[10] I don't know where BigDT got the idea that the drawing is based on original research, as the shape is not a new discovery. It can be verified very easily, also. If someone can add back the material for the entry in question, then the image will be used again.--Primetime 08:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • OR means orphaned, not original research. The reason you didn't receive a reply is ... well ... there haven't been too terribly many waking hours since you sent the message. Honestly, I don't see the use in such a tiny image ... but whatever ... if it has potential to be used, I withdraw my nomination. BigDT 12:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Shoottokill (notify | contribs). OR, looks like a scan of a product label, and thus, a copyrighted image. BigDT 17:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Qwerty103 (notify | contribs). Too small to be of encyclopedic use, used only in the currently-being-proded Radio Halton BigDT 17:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Footshills (notify | contribs). I beleive this is a copyvio. It seems to have the same source as the one used on the hospital's official web site here, even showing the same cars in the picture. Also, the picture is taken from a height, which makes it unlikely an amateur took it. I haven't found the original it was taken for, but assume the hospital owns it. No fairuse claim, as this image is easily replaceable, and will be replaced shortly with a PD image.- Rob 20:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Benedicto16 (notify | contribs). Image used to ullstrate the WTC artilce, not the film itself, whcih does not qualify as fair use. WTC article already has many free images. Also, the WTC film article also has an adequate number of pictures to, perhaps maybe too much. Hbdragon88 20:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Benedicto16 (notify | contribs). I don't find it particularly useful, as the WTC film article already has a poster, whcih gives similar inofrmation. Hbdragon88 20:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mamimi.jpg
Image:Handcowboy.JPG
Image:Kantivsarm.JPG
Mamimi.jpg is obsolete (rendered thus by Image:Mamimi.JPG, Image:Mamimi3.jpg and Image:Mamimicamera.JPG) and the other two are of relatively poor quality, do not illustrate anything particularly well, and are not linked to by any pages. They were both uploaded by User:Blademaster313, who has OK'd me for their deletion. I've contacted User:WBredefeld, the uploader of the first image, and left a message to allow him/her to contest this nomination if he/she sees fit. These images all came from Category:FLCL images, and anyone with a lot of free time on their hands can have a look and see if we have any other egregious overkill. -Litefantastic 21:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wd40gdw (notify | contribs). This user uploaded several images from USC websites and claimed, after being warned that they would be deleted, that they were released under the GFDL. Doubtful. BigDT 23:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wd40gdw (notify | contribs). This user uploaded several images from USC websites and claimed, after being warned that they would be deleted, that they were released under the GFDL. Doubtful. BigDT 23:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wd40gdw (notify | contribs). This user uploaded several images from USC websites and claimed, after being warned that they would be deleted, that they were released under the GFDL. Doubtful. BigDT 23:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wd40gdw (notify | contribs). This user uploaded several images from USC websites and claimed, after being warned that they would be deleted, that they were released under the GFDL. Doubtful. BigDT 23:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wd40gdw (notify | contribs). This user uploaded several images from USC websites and claimed, after being warned that they would be deleted, that they were released under the GFDL. Doubtful. BigDT 23:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wd40gdw (notify | contribs). This user uploaded several images from USC websites and claimed, after being warned that they would be deleted, that they were released under the GFDL. Doubtful. BigDT 23:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Justin Foote (notify | contribs). OR. Not PD as stated. Justin Foote 00:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]