Uploaded by Rizsaj (notify | contribs). Image was prodded with message "unencyclopedic, can someone else do the IfD stuff?" As Prod is not for media, I am listing here. This is a procedural nomination, so I therefore abstain—RoninBKETC 12:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Uploaded by Rizsaj (notify | contribs). Image was prodded with message "unencyclopedic" As Prod is not for media, I am listing here. This is a procedural nomination, so I therefore abstain—RoninBKETC 12:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Mikeabundo (notify | contribs). UE. Image is debate in regards to what is appropiate in article Cosplay. Talk:Cosplay is the main battleground. Main concern to nominator is that one of the links, is directing to a Model site, where nudity can be readily seen on the linked page. Also, links and use of the photo are in question due to Wikipedia:Spam, where the link in question is linking to a model site, and the uploader of the image shares the same name as one of the contributors on the site.—293.xx.xxx.xx 09:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Attribution, as long as it is on the image space and not in the article, is not spam. Image is under a free licence (cc-by). This is a content dispute, not suitable for "images and media for deletion". --GunnarRene 12:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's still dangerously skirting Spam policies.--293.xx.xxx.xx 20:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No it is not. Not as long as there's no links and names added to the article. In the current version of the article, neither the site name nor the link is included. --GunnarRene 10:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the external link on the image description page as there is no need for it. The image is supposedly from Pinoy Cosplay website but I could not find it. Need exact URL for image to verify CC status if image is to stay. -Nv8200ptalk 00:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good call on deleting that blog link. Simplest solution is usually the best, right? I'm now putting the exact URL in the image page where it belongs, and linking to the model's user profile on the site, to establish the connection that way.--GunnarRene 22:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Fingers87 (notify | contribs). Uploaded for the sole purpose of making vandalistic edits to hammer. These were the user's only edits. They have been reverted, leaving this image orphaned. The image's GDFL license tag is also illegitimate.—leigh(φθόγγος) 12:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Aarchiba (notify | contribs). Name conflicts with commons such that commons image can't be displayed properly; duplicate image exists on commons as image:pipette2.jpg; orphan—Rifleman 82 17:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Rob Bonnet article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Spencer Kelly article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 18:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Susan Osman article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 18:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Lucy Hockings article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 18:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Alastair Yates article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 18:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Alex Deakin article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 18:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Zeinab Badawi article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 18:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Mishal Husain article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 19:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Sophie Raworth article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 19:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Bill Turnbull article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 19:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Maxine Mawhinney article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 19:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Mike Embley article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by User:Desk1 (notify | contribs). UE, was used on the USS Saipan (LHA-2) page, but I removed it from there as it has nothing to do with the USS Saipan and appears just to be two sailors who went to a party. Taken from an eBook. I see no use for this on Wikipedia.—MECU≈talk 20:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Andrew Gilligan article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Asad Ahmad article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Anna Ford article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Emily Maitlis article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Nick Owen article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Philip Hayton article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Jamie Owen article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 20:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Isobel Lang article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 21:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). Invalid fair use claim since the image is only used to show what the subject of the Kirsty McCabe article looks like, and the content can be recreated as free use as the subject is living.- Wikiwoohoo 21:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Twas Now (notify | contribs). OB & OR: Image obsoleted by Maroon_Cocoon_(Bart_Davenport_cover).jpg to comply with Wikipedia naming conventions.—Twas Now 23:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Twas Now (notify | contribs). OB & OR: Image obsoleted by Skyscraper_National_Park_(Hayden_album).jpg to comply with Wikipedia naming conventions.—Twas Now 23:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jketola (notify | contribs). orphaned image, recently absent uploader, the page this was for (as given in text) has other images of the birds in the wild which are clearer and better frame the subject Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr.) 23:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
