Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 May 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 22[edit]

Uploaded by 204080 (notify). OR —Wknight94 (talk) 01:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by 204080 (notify). OR —Wknight94 (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Voyajer (notify). UE; The image was determined on Talk:Uncertainty Principle to be so problematic as to be unuseful in the encyclopedia. —ScienceApologist 02:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As I explained there, it is only misleading and does not help at all. Rcq 22:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Khulgun (notify). OR, UE. User has also uploaded quite a few images with bad copyright info (since deleted) and has used WP as a storage site for his/her blog (see user's talk page) —PS2pcGAMER (talk) 04:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded by Sorvonsa (notify). This image is being used to slander contemporary Croatia without any references or sources. In the meantime (see below), it has been discovered that the image has a false copyright claim. --Zmaj 13:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep The image perfectly illustrates the neo-Ustasha gatherings, which exist in Croatia. Parading in black uniforms is well known and documented.[1], [2] This is attempt of abuse of deletion procedure for censorship of unpleasant aspects of Croatian reality. That is not acceptable. Maayaa 08:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your sources are beside the point. What needs sources is the image itself, not its topic. I could dress as a policeman and "perfectly illustrate" the police, but I would still be a fake. This image is currently being used for serious accusations, but it is not supported with a source. Therefore, it should be deleted. --Zmaj 08:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It proves that it is not a slander. Displays like that on the picture are well known to exist in croatia, and I have provided examples. Your motivation is clearly to censor the bad things (from my perspective they are bad) that happen in Croatia. Do you dispute that there are black uniforms? Do you claim that Novi list is lying, and everyone who points out what Croatians do. You cant change reality by censorship! Maayaa 09:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - One picture is worth a thousand words. --Marko M 09:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kaster 09:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC) (If PD, this picture must be copied/removed to commons to and adequate categorised.)[reply]
Keep --Jovanvb 11:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Esprit15d 13:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page is not about voting but about arguments for keeping or deleting an image. --Zmaj 14:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Djus 16:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - doesn't anyone find it odd that a Croat wants the photo deleted because it shows that neonazism lives in Croatia to this day? What kind of Croat wouldn't want to show it and try to get others to see how bad the situation is? What kind of Croat would just like to hide the fact that there are neonazis in Croatia? I think he's in the photo. --serbiana - talk 18:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Let's keep racism and personal attacks out of this, please. Follow WP:CIVIL or don't comment. I vote for the image to be removed until someone can substantiate where the picture was taken, who took it, who is in it, and whether or not those individuals consented to the use of their likeness on the Internet.—Kbolino 22:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - the deletion proposer doesn't want to be exposed. The picture is horrific but we should keep it.--TheFEARgod 20:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Yeah, if we close our eyes on this kind of things, they'll just dissapear... hmm.. right -- Obradović Goran (talk 20:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep --Medule 20:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. This is a copyright violation. The picture was published on the Croatian commercial internet portal index.hr here. The license information falsely presents it as public domain (uploader's photo) and gives false details (year is given as 2003, whereas it was taken in 2004, the location specified by the uploader is Croatia, while the photo was taken in Bleiburg, Austria). --Elephantus 11:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
change to speedy delete. False copyright claim, just as I assumed. --Ante Perkovic 11:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My previous comment:I don't have anything against picures that prove that some people in Croatia sometimes wear this uniformes (on right-wing rallies), but the user who uploaded it just popped up and went away forever. I believe this could be a fake and that we will never be able to contact this user. In short - this picture lacks verifiability. I suggest searching google, finding another picture and replacing this image with some other image of the same kind. This way, we would have a picture that makes the point, but there would be no controversy related to source. --Ante Perkovic 10:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Because this picture, don't shows anything against croatian nation, it just shows new fashion of revitalizing ustashis. --212.200.204.80 13:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong keep This pcture is excatly why Croats are called "genocide nation".Instead of being ashame of their WW2 history,they are proud of 800.000. Serbs killed during those 4 years.

Dzoni`

Very strong keep Just update the copyright information and get the permission, from the picture copyright owner, for fair use here.--Purger 20:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In order to support the reason for keeping the picture, here is another view/prospective of the same group of people wearing the Ustashi uniforms - at Bleiburg, most certainly! [3], [4]--Purger 20:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion continues on Image talk:Lipadom.jpg. howcheng {chat} 21:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Trevorw (notify). AB, OB to Image:25-49 Battalion RQR Colour Patch.svg, only use was on 25th/49th Battalion which now uses the SVG version.- --james °o 10:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded by Akrabbim (notify). No source information, and there is a copyright tag on the photo!- Esprit15d 14:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you're right. It was a hasty upload, so I didn't notice it until now. I have no objections. —Akrabbimtalk 18:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by MiG Eater (notify). vanity photo for vanity articles
Uploaded by MiG Eater (notify). more of the same —LimoWreck 14:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Stevennnnnnnnnn (notify). OR from deleted article.- Drat (Talk) 15:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded by Akhristov (notify). OB by Aerlinguslogo.svg —RedHot 17:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by CharlieHuang (notify). OB: replaced by Image:Qin_part_names.png —Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 18:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by User talk:Supercoop Image:Aurek.png listed for deletion by User:Supercoop (notify). OR DP - I uploaded this one; however, the reason I didn't ask for a speedy delete is there may be somone that want to keep it? —Supercoop 21:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Spartian. I have notified the user. The file is incorrectly named - the tiger in the image is not a Bengal Tiger, but a Sumatran Tiger. I have reuploaded the image with an appriopriate filename: Image:SumatranTigerToronto.JPG . For more, see the Tiger talk page and the talk page for the reuploaded image. - Slow Graffiti 21:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2006_May_22&oldid=1138513844"