Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 October 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 5

Uploaded by Llansam (notify | contribs). OR, UE, vanity?- YellowDot 00:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Owapo (notify | contribs). OR, UE, AB ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Zero niner (notify | contribs). Three identical pictures uploaded by the same person, all tell a different story on copyrights, all are orphans)- YellowDot 01:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Zero niner (notify | contribs). OR, unclear copyright (user claimed PD-self's under different names)- YellowDot 01:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Nesnora (notify | contribs). OR, picture of nn-artist- YellowDot 01:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Nesnora (notify | contribs). OR, modified copy of the above- YellowDot 01:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Nesnora (notify | contribs). Wikipedia-only permission, used just for user page of artist who does not merit inclusion in WP- YellowDot 01:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Traderjoe246 (notify | contribs). OR, description page is a complete mess, unclear copyright status- YellowDot 01:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Viking1943 (notify | contribs). OR, horid quality- YellowDot 01:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by ToddC4176 (notify | contribs). OR, lower resolution copy of Image:Pizzitola-Front.JPG- YellowDot 02:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by ToddC4176 (notify | contribs). OR, lower resolution copy of Image:Pizzitola-Front.JPG- YellowDot 02:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emans (notify | contribs). OR, lower resolution copy of Image:IMG 1000 Opera IPK.jpg- YellowDot 02:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Sudrin (notify | contribs). OR, UE, unclear copyrights- YellowDot 02:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rabitgurlie328@aol.com (notify | contribs). OR, AB, Maybe vanity Nv8200p talk 03:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rabitgurlie328@aol.com (notify | contribs). OR, AB, Maybe vanity Nv8200p talk 03:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Redvers (notify | contribs). OR, LQ, UE Nv8200p talk 03:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And moved by him to Commons. ЯEDVERS 19:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Tim8990 (notify | contribs). OR, AB Nv8200p talk 03:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Pboyd04 (notify | contribs). OR Nv8200p talk 03:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR Nv8200p talk 03:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by J Lennon (notify | contribs). OR, AB Nv8200p talk 03:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Iancollin (notify | contribs). OR, UE, AB Nv8200p talk 03:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Robb Blake (notify | contribs). OR, UE, AB Nv8200p talk 03:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jamino (notify | contribs). OR, UE Nv8200p talk 03:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Bond Extreme (notify | contribs). The summary states "The logo for the Royal Honor Ministries site. This is ours, and we made it. No one else can use it." Doesn't this violate Wikipedia's policies? Also, if its article is deleted (which I suspect it will), it will be an orphaned copyright logo for a group that won't have a Wikipedia page for quite some time. Metros232 12:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by DaveGorman (notify | contribs). The copyrighted image is no longer used. In the article Hollow Man it is replaced by the film poster according to the Style guidelines of the WikiProject:Films. Ilse@ 14:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by YUL89YYZ (notify | contribs). The copyrighted image is no longer used. In the article Total Recall it is replaced by the film poster according to the Style guidelines of the WikiProject:Films. Ilse@ 15:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by TOkKa (notify | contribs). CV - Tagged as a GFDL press photo. I hate to not assume good faith, but user has uploaded dodgy images in the past, and I see no evidence that they actually created the press photo. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All OR, OB by SVG versions (Image:US 22.svg et al) on Commons. —Scott5114 18:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ellmist (notify | contribs). This picture is availabe on Commons as a much higher resolution featured picture as the same name of Commons:Image:Citrus fruits.jpg. I want to nominate the commons version for Wikipedia Reatured Picture, but I can't until this one is deleted. I added a {{NowCommonsThis}} tag to the image page, but the backlog over there is so severe that it won't get deleted for months. I was hoping this would work as a faster alternative. NauticaShades(talk) 18:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing it! NauticaShades 09:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OR, OB by {{GBthumb}} etc. Uploader notified. — Wereon 19:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleted (bluelinks above are files on commons). --Sherool (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Scarecroe (notify | contribs). Unfree image of living person. Fails #1 on WP:FUC (see counterexample #8 in WP:FU#Counterexamples). Also, source info is unverifiable (but {{no source}} keeps being reverted.- Abu Badali 21:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image comes from the Warner Brothers press kit meant to promote the film and is free for use. —scarecroe 22:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, what? It's a fictional character played by a real living person. FUC criteria #1 doesn't apply here unless someone took a picture on the set, which I highly doubt is allowable. Hbdragon88 04:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The image is being used as the main image on the actress articke and is not used at all on the character's article.
It's use on the movie's article would be ok if we had some verifiable source info. The source info must be verified so that we're sure this images was really realeased for widespread promotional use. Dozens of images are deleted everyday on WP:CP after being wrongly tagged as promotional. --Abu Badali 21:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then remove it from Bosworth's article, and put it on Lois Lane. It's already being used on Superman Returns. Done deal. Hbdragon88 04:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not done yet. We still need some verifiable source information. --Abu Badali 04:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted for lacking a source. howcheng {chat} 16:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]