Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 September 27

< September 26	September 28 >

September 27

Image:Kingcounty-wa.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by RobLa (notify | contribs). OR, OB by Image:King County (Washington) map.gif on Commons. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be too quick to delete this. Image:King County (Washington) map.gif is mislabeled as being U.S. Public Domain, when in fact the image was lifted off of the King County website. -- RobLa 05:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted. Instead, Image:King County (Washington) map.gif tagged for deletion on Commons (noncommercial-use only). howch e ng {chat} 17:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Image:Male_human_buttocks.jpg~~ (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Neitram (notify | contribs). Rude and UnencyopedicNathannoblet 10:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this image was actually created in good faith in the Buttocks article; readers of German can consult de:Diskussion:Gesäß#Neuer_Bildvorschlag for more. Peter O. (Talk) 15:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Local copy deleted. Now on Commons -Nv8200p talk 14:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Agelaius_phoeniceus1.jpg (talk | delete) Obsolete. mdf 13:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zenaida_macroura1.jpg (talk | delete) Obsolete. mdf 13:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zenaida_macroura2.jpg (talk | delete) Redundant, orphan and obsolete. mdf 13:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Numenius-phaeopus-001.jpg (talk | delete) Orphaned redundancy. mdf 13:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anas-americana-003.jpg (talk | delete) Obsolete orphan. mdf 13:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Passer-domesticus-001.jpg (talk | delete) Obsolete, orphan and redundant. mdf 13:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IBM logo.svg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Smart Fox (notify | contribs). SVG of registered trademark. As such, fails fair use criterion of image resolution limitation. In use by many articles; will need to be replaced by PNG. -- Denelson 83 21:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - SVG images are not "infinite" resolution - they have no resolution. Resolution is not a property of an SVG image. It's like arguing about the color of a thought or the smell of outer space. Those things just don't exist. Virginia Tech has won infinitely times as many football games as Wikipedia only because Wikipedia doesn't play football. The only discussion I have seen on the issue was here and to my knowledge, no consensus has been reached on the subject. BigDT 19:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted. Unless some sort of decision is made with regards to file format of logos, this image is preferable to a raster version. howch e ng {chat} 17:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]