Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 March 23
March 23[edit]
Image:1955 addition.JPG[edit]
- OR/UE (non-notable)/LQ — -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 00:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:1965 addition.JPG[edit]
- OR/UE (non-notable)/LQ — -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 00:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:1988 addition.jpg[edit]
- OR/UE (non-notable)/LQ — -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 00:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:DSP Block.GIF[edit]
- Obsolete, orphan. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:-U.S.-MEXICO-BOREDER-.gif[edit]
- - uploaded by Cooljuno411 (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete, orphan. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Blues scale jpg.JPG[edit]
- - uploaded by Cielomobile (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete, orphan. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:WestHam_Nameboard.png[edit]
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Formerly used in "West Ham station." Related to 2007-03-22 mass nomination. Iamunknown 02:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:IMG 4202.JPG[edit]
- - uploaded by [[User talk:user:Kerem Ozcan#Image:IMG 4202.JPG listed for deletion|user:Kerem Ozcan]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:user:Kerem Ozcan|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/user:Kerem Ozcan|contribs]]).
- I uploaded the image, unfortunately named it wrong, and reuploaded it again as image:VesteCoburgNight.jpg . So no need for this. — Kerem Özcan 02:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:AdolfHitlerParis.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by LordHarris (notify | contribs).
- was deleted from commons for being a derivative of a copyrighted work of art (the photograph that this photograph is of is copyrighted itself) Yonatan talk 04:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose This image is a low quality photograph of a photograph. Not only does it most likely fall under fair use because of its low quality but also I was given permission to photograph the photograph gallery of the Churchill Museum, who themselves hold the ability to reproduce the photographs themselves. Therfore this photograph is merely an extension falls under the rights of their copyright use. LordHarris 21:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Then it should be tagged as fair use. Who was the photographer of the photo in the jpg? --Iamunknown 18:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Miriam2.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by Mariamarcen (notify | contribs).
- See below — Golbez 05:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Miriam3.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by Mariamarcen (notify | contribs).
- Subject of an article currently being argued on BLP grounds; these pictures were originally put up for speedy by User:Longhair, but in the interest of fostering discussion on the matter I'm taking them to IFD instead. They were uploaded by User:Mariamarcen, whom based on their other uploads, is suspected by User:Hfarmer to be the subject of the article, and thus the owner and releaser of the pictures. However, this cannot be proven, the user having not made a statement either way, let alone a reliably sourced one, and therefore we cannot be sure. I have no opinion on this IFD - I am just moving it from speedy to IFD for the greater community to have a look at. Other images uploaded by User:Mariamarcen include Image:Miriam4.jpg and Image:Miriam as a boy.jpg, which were not put up by speedy by User:Longhair but I mention them here because they suffer from the same lack-of-source-but-possibly-uploaded-by-subject-of-picture issue. I will finally note that User:Mariamarcen has not edited since April 2006, so it is unlikely they will be able to contribute to this discussion. — Golbez 05:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I actually listed all images at Miriam Rivera, not one, as having no source information. -- Longhair\talk 05:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- You marked only two as speedy, this one and the above one. --Golbez 06:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- For the benefit of this page here is my position, in short. The pictures were added by none other than Miriam Rivera herself, or someone acting on her behalf with her approval. A picture from grade school and a picture that looks as if it was taken by her would be impossible for anyone but Miriam or a family member to come by. Then there is the history of contributions by the person who added the pictures. User:Mariamarcen seems to be rather knowledgeable about topics related to the very subculture Miriam lives in. If this is not proof, what would be? An "established wikipedia presence" as a contributor to be honest that could be faked. A signed notarized legal affadavit with witnesses? That would be proof but come on what other image has that kind of heavy requierment on it? By the same standards that are actually in practice on wikipedia these pictures seem to be just fine.--Hfarmer 09:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- You marked only two as speedy, this one and the above one. --Golbez 06:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that this image (Image:Miriam3.jpg) comes under the fair use rationale as 1) it was provided as a promotional image by the subject herself 2) it is solely used to illustrate the subject in question (Miriam Rivera) and 3) a suitable free image is not readily available in this case, nor will it likely be. - Alison☺ 17:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that photo was taken by Maya Guez. If so, getting it released should be pretty easy by contacting her directly. However, Miriam modeled with a few big-name photographers who probably would not release their work into the public domain. I suggest we delete this and contact Maya for a GFDL-released image. Jokestress 19:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you have her phone number or email address...wait I belive that Maya Guez has a biographical page here and has been involved in editing it. I will see if she will respond to this right here.--Hfarmer 23:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have left a message on her talk page. Can we give this some time to work. afterall this pic has been here for a while if anyone was going to sue I think it would have happened by now. a few more days could not hurt much more. --Hfarmer 23:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- We don't upload images first and get permissions later. This should be deleted until properly sourced and cleared. Most photographers will respond better to that kind of request, rather than, "Hey, we have been using your photo and now want permission." Jokestress 19:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- The question rest on who was User:Mariamarcen and how did they have access to the pictures they posted? Take a close look at what that user did while she was active here. I know that particular intreest is not unique but taken with the scarcity of all those pictures (i.e. the subject of the pictures as a child. I am unable to imagine how anyone else could have obtained that one.) There is every reason to believe that Miriam herself put those pictures in the article. Only a special overabundance of caution could justify removing these. --Hfarmer 02:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- The Miriam "before" picture was widely published in 2004 during the airing of the show. That does not mean it is released into the public domain, even if Miriam gave it to newspapers herself. Please review Wikipedia:Copyrights. Any speculation on who uploaded it is unproven and irrelevant. The bottom line is that these images do not have proper clearance, and thus violate policy. Jokestress 18:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Really? Where else have you seen it. Many people on HA men and TS some of who are fans of hers seemed to have never seen it before. I'm not calling you a liar I just want to check your claim. For if what you say is true then you have a point. If not then I have a point. --Hfarmer 00:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- [1]. Jokestress 01:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Really? Where else have you seen it. Many people on HA men and TS some of who are fans of hers seemed to have never seen it before. I'm not calling you a liar I just want to check your claim. For if what you say is true then you have a point. If not then I have a point. --Hfarmer 00:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- The Miriam "before" picture was widely published in 2004 during the airing of the show. That does not mean it is released into the public domain, even if Miriam gave it to newspapers herself. Please review Wikipedia:Copyrights. Any speculation on who uploaded it is unproven and irrelevant. The bottom line is that these images do not have proper clearance, and thus violate policy. Jokestress 18:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- The question rest on who was User:Mariamarcen and how did they have access to the pictures they posted? Take a close look at what that user did while she was active here. I know that particular intreest is not unique but taken with the scarcity of all those pictures (i.e. the subject of the pictures as a child. I am unable to imagine how anyone else could have obtained that one.) There is every reason to believe that Miriam herself put those pictures in the article. Only a special overabundance of caution could justify removing these. --Hfarmer 02:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- We don't upload images first and get permissions later. This should be deleted until properly sourced and cleared. Most photographers will respond better to that kind of request, rather than, "Hey, we have been using your photo and now want permission." Jokestress 19:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that photo was taken by Maya Guez. If so, getting it released should be pretty easy by contacting her directly. However, Miriam modeled with a few big-name photographers who probably would not release their work into the public domain. I suggest we delete this and contact Maya for a GFDL-released image. Jokestress 19:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that this image (Image:Miriam3.jpg) comes under the fair use rationale as 1) it was provided as a promotional image by the subject herself 2) it is solely used to illustrate the subject in question (Miriam Rivera) and 3) a suitable free image is not readily available in this case, nor will it likely be. - Alison☺ 17:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:P03372.011_.jpg[edit]
- Duplicate of Image:P03372.011 kittybomber.jpg — Grant | Talk 05:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
Image:Raven006.jpg[edit]
- Image is a phostoshoped collage of multiple images from various sources. None of these sources is cited. Cited source is a holding space at another web site. — J Greb 05:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- We aren't responsible for collages the _copyright owner_ makes themselves. To ask us to identify the source of the original images in that case is absurd. Nardman1 02:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm missing something obvious, so please entertain me. What evidence suggests the copyright owner has created this collage? Is http://www.titanstower.com/ operated by the copyright holder? --Iamunknown 02:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Double checked, turns out it's a fan site. Right. Nardman1 05:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm missing something obvious, so please entertain me. What evidence suggests the copyright owner has created this collage? Is http://www.titanstower.com/ operated by the copyright holder? --Iamunknown 02:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- We aren't responsible for collages the _copyright owner_ makes themselves. To ask us to identify the source of the original images in that case is absurd. Nardman1 02:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Seal.gif[edit]
- - uploaded by Glfootball92 (notify | contribs).
- Delete, upload Image:Pleasedont.gif, protect from recreation; the image has been uploaded and deleted multiple times, and in the currently visible log under "File history" has been changed twice. Iamunknown 05:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've reuploaded the All Hallows seal (which most recently occupied this slot) under a more descriptive name and adjusted the referencing page. This image is, therefore, now orphaned. -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 12:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Iuani2.gif[edit]
- - uploaded by Slaughterhouseo1 (notify | contribs).
- Image lacks fair use rationale, and is likely to give seizures — Nardman1 06:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
Image:Daemon-pcbsd.png[edit]
- CV (uploader claimed GNU FDL but it is certainly not, see http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html for detail. Similar Images have been deleted before — Arved 13:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
Image:CLEAR AS A TAIWANESE GIRL.JPG[edit]
- Unencyclopedic; licensing info not backed up; appears to have been uploaded by user solely to diss the subjects of the photographs.
Same goes for Image:TAIJI.JPG.
-- ran (talk) 14:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:HMS Cornwall (F99).jpg[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- OB Image:HMS Cornwall (F99).jpg obsoleted by Image:HMS Cornwall F99 July 2006.jpg The first image is used under an unfree license that prevents 3rd party use, however the new image is under the Creative commons 2.0 sharealike license. — malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 14:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Anti-Red_China_Poster.jpg[edit]
- Okay, if I upload the image on another site, can I still keep it? Because I believe I did that once before. ---- DanTD 16:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Ebony and I.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by JoelGRichards (notify | contribs).
Image:Bf 109E-4.jpg[edit]
- no rationale, assumes public domain but ww2incolor is a notorious ripoff site that scans color images from books discarding the copyright information- no claim that the image is PD is made on the site, no detail as to who took the image are made, most likely a German photographer placing the image under German copyright law. Examples of the aircraft are preserved anyway meaning use of a picture with no details just plain lazy. — Fluffy999 15:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Roderick_the_stick_insect.jpg[edit]
Image:SC2003.jpeg[edit]
Image:SC2-1953.png[edit]
- Orphaned, Not clear to me that this is actually a Silver Certificate after reading the article and comparing it to other bills displayed BigrTex 16:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Slabs.png[edit]
Image:Hypercube_cubes.png[edit]
- - uploaded by Markus Krötzsch (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Obsolete via Hypercube cubes.svg on commons -- Selket Talk 18:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Of course the old raster version of this image should be deleted. Thanks for converting the original graphic into SVG. Same comment holds for my other graphics in Hasse diagram#Finding a "good" Hasse diagram as soon as SVG-Versions are available. --Markus Krötzsch 17:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sits at Commons. --Iamunknown 18:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:TX3.JPG[edit]
- Orphaned BigrTex 18:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, this is a duplicate. Somnabot 20:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Virginia_648.png[edit]
- - uploaded by VitaleBaby (notify | contribs).
Image:Brigade.JPG[edit]
- - uploaded by Indianhilbilly (notify | contribs).
Image:Santacruz Domestic Airport.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by Indianhilbilly (notify | contribs).
Image:VT1.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by Indianhilbilly (notify | contribs).
Image:Washington1.jpg[edit]
Image:WA-545.gif[edit]
Image:WA-533.gif[edit]
Image:WA-521.gif[edit]
Image:WA-118.gif[edit]
Image:WA-114.gif[edit]
Image:WA-511.gif[edit]
Image:WA-541.gif[edit]
Image:WA-970.gif[edit]
Image:WA-549.gif[edit]
Image:WA-535.gif[edit]
Image:WA-175.gif[edit]
Image:KeywindMovement3.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by OneExoticBoy (notify | contribs).
Image:1970ThunderingHerd.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by OneExoticBoy (notify | contribs).
Image:-8ball.GIF[edit]
- Orphan, uncertain copyright status. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:276.jpg[edit]
- Low quality for a screenshot. Peter O. (Talk) 21:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Fair use is supposed to be low quality. :P Nardman1 01:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:297.jpg[edit]
- Low quality for a screenshot. Peter O. (Talk) 21:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Fair use is supposed to be low quality. :P Nardman1 01:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:SOCOOL.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by Ultimateshowdown (notify | contribs).
Image:DSCN4163.JPG[edit]
- - uploaded by Cry baby99 (notify | contribs).
Image:DSCN4163.JPG[edit]
- - uploaded by Cry baby99 (notify | contribs).
Image:839383589_l.jpg[edit]
Image:Ryan_heppe1.jpg[edit]
Image:18536134lg.jpg[edit]
Image:Valcor.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by Puleinator (notify | contribs).
Image:Horse_Expo_001.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by JayRicardo311 (notify | contribs).
Image:Skale2r1.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by SensualMystic (notify | contribs).
Image:Lost_colony_drake.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by BrittonLaRoche (notify | contribs).
- Absent uploader BigrTex 22:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indef blocked problem user, in addition to abusive sockpuppetry, suspicions that at least some of this image uploads were photoshopped versions of copyrighted images, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BrittonLaRoche for some of the flavour. Pete.Hurd 01:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Phyllis_jackson.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by BrittonLaRoche (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 22:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indef blocked problem user, in addition to abusive sockpuppetry, suspicions that at least some of this image uploads were photoshopped versions of copyrighted images, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BrittonLaRoche for some of the flavour. Pete.Hurd 01:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Celtictoe.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by BrittonLaRoche (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 22:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indef blocked problem user, in addition to abusive sockpuppetry, suspicions that at least some of this image uploads were photoshopped versions of copyrighted images, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BrittonLaRoche for some of the flavour. Pete.Hurd 01:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Toering.jpg[edit]
- - uploaded by BrittonLaRoche (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 23:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indef blocked problem user, in addition to abusive sockpuppetry, suspicions that at least some of this image uploads were photoshopped versions of copyrighted images, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BrittonLaRoche for some of the flavour. Pete.Hurd 01:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Different commons image showing through. ~ BigrTex 14:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)