Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 October 19
Appearance
< October 18 | October 20 > |
---|
October 19
[edit]- Image of unclear or non-notable subject. Alksub 23:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- It is orphaned, and it doesn't look like it was ever added to an article, so I think we can go with the delete in this case. - ForeverTime 16:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Encyclopedist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Videmus Omnia Talk 00:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Featherofwriter (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, possibly Copyright violation, article was deleted in AFD Coredesat 00:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- The book itself never had an article it would seem, just the author (which has now been deleted), so this image should be too. - ForeverTime 16:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fuzzybuddy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Getty image. No evidence of GFDL release Nv8200p talk 02:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Getty image. Edivence of GFDL release stated on website. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzybuddy (talk • contribs) 13:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- False. Did you even read it? Delete this image. -- RG2 23:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- But there is even a link below the image to download it! [2] Fuzzybuddy 17:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- But that doesn't make it free; that's not how copyright works. -- RG2 23:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- But there is even a link below the image to download it! [2] Fuzzybuddy 17:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- False. Did you even read it? Delete this image. -- RG2 23:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 02:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Vipingeorge (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, Possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 02:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Magnumlaude (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Magnumlaude (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Cpshorrock (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep/Copy to Commons. It's a free image, some project must be able to use it. ViperSnake151 15:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept and tagged with {{movetocommons}}. -- RG2 22:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Cpshorrock (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep/Copy to Commons. It's a free image, some project must be able to use it. ViperSnake151 15:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept and tagged with {{movetocommons}}. -- RG2 22:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Mahak_library (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep/Copy to Commons. It's a free image, some project must be able to use it. ViperSnake151 15:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept and tagged with {{movetocommons}}. -- RG2 22:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Encyclopedist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image not found at given source, unable to confirm license, uploader history of copyvio. Videmus Omnia Talk 04:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Encyclopedist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No evidence of public domain license. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Encyclopedist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, uploader history of copyvio. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Videmus Omnia Talk 05:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing out that the photo had been orphaned. I have now added it to the article on Boston Common. The pond is a major feature of that park. — President Lethe 04:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- The image is a derivative of Image:FrogPondBostonCommon.JPG, which was nominated for deletion below, partially due to the uploader's questionable upload history. If that one's deleted, this one probably should be, too. -- RG2 23:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Uploaded as GDFL. Why don't we assume good faith? --Knulclunk 01:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept. -- RG2 23:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Encyclopedist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, uploader history of copyvio. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Encyclopedist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, probably unfree. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Encyclopedist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, probably unfree. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fuelbottle (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Derivative work with no copyright status on originals. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Derivative work with no copyright status on original images. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fuelbottle (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Derivative work with no copyright status on original images. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Not web resolution. Does little to illustrate its article (OSx86.) 203.192.81.123 07:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - even though the Core 2 wasn't even in Macintoshes at the time that 10.4 for Intel was out, this shows a hacked version of Mac OS X 10.4 running on Non-Apple hardware. I also don't get the whole OMG IT HAS TO BE WEB RESOLUTION thing either, we have full screenshots of other non-free operating systems, and we haven't cared! ViperSnake151 15:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- No consensus to delete; image kept. -- RG2 12:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wilsbadkarma (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is not a public domain work of US military, but a copyrighted derivative work from a commercial website. Videmus Omnia Talk 15:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well whoever made it didn't own the copyright in the first place, and is useful picture so I oppose deletion. --Pumpmeup 03:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- We delete images sourced from uniforminsignia.net. -- RG2 12:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Sri Lankan military rank insignia
[edit]The following images of Sri Lankan military rank insignia were not produced by the Sri Lankan government, but by the commercial website http://www.uniforminsignia.net, and are claimed here under fair use. However, the website who produced these is also an encyclopedia, and our usage of the images is in direct competition with them, making these a violation of WP:NFCC#2. Videmus Omnia Talk 15:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Image:Air chief marshal.gif
- Image:Air marshal.gif
- Image:Air vice marshal.gif
- Image:Air commodore.gif
- Image:Group captain.gif
- Image:Wing commander.gif
- Image:Squadron leader.gif
- Image:Flight lieutenant.gif
- Image:Flying officer.gif
- Image:Pilot officer.gif
- Image:Warrant officer.gif
- Image:Flight sergeant.gif
- Image:Sergeant.gif
- Image:Corporal.gif
- Image:Leading aircraftsman.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy ADMIRAL.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy VICE ADMIRAL.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy REAR ADMIRAL.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy COMMODORE.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy CAPTAIN.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy LIEUTENANT COMMANDER.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy COMMANDER.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy MIDSHIPMAN.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy SUB LIEUTENANT.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy LIEUTENANT.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy CHIEF PETTY OFFICER.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy PETTY OFFICER.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy LEADING RATE.gif
- Image:Srilanka-navy FLEET CHIEF PETTY OFFICER.gif
- Stabilo_boss (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, unable to confirm free license. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Should be {PD-Ireland} but as its an orphan it can be deleted.. Stabilo boss 13:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- TheShawMistro (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Classicalgas (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Classicalgas (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Logo of eBay account website Yankeroo.com, possibly intended for spam purposes. Same user also created speedied Yankee Roo article. Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Possible Copyright violation.Tokek 20:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Peter_Eisenburger (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- 1) this does not contribute significantly to the article. readers will not understand teh product any less by having no first edition box 2) this might be replaceable anyways, since a user might be able to take a photo of an old copy Calliopejen1 21:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep.1) A chapter of the article is about the launch of exactly this version of the product. 2) It's unrealistic to the the degree of impossible to receive a photo of this release which is 11 years ago. Arguments like these of Calliopejen result in the ongoing loss of valueable information from Wikipedia. And contributors too. --Peter Eisenburger 06:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, under one condition. IF and ONLY IF someone can't take a picture of the box themself, we can keep this for now. ViperSnake151 15:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept. I really don't see this image as necessary to help readers' understanding, but I don't see a clear consensus to delete, either. -- RG2 12:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Domain of lighting (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Obselete, uploaded to illustrate a computer graphics technique on Christopher Paul Neil but replaced by Image:Mona lisa twirled.jpg. See Talk:Christopher Paul Neil for why it's no longer used: using an image of an unrelated innocent person on an article about an accused child sexual abuser is a BLP problem. Thayvian 23:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete I am the creator of the image, no objections to deletion for above reason 81.149.250.228 05:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)