Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 September 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 16 September 18 >

September 17[edit]

Image:BN4072 12.jpg[edit]

Image:BN4072 12.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Godhunter (notify | contribs).
  • Proposed self photo of a place that doesn't exsist, so where did it come from?- 217.43.58.131 10:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Kunkanti hotel.jpg[edit]

Image:Kunkanti hotel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Godhunter (notify | contribs).
  • proposed self photo of a place that doesn't exsist. The real copyright status needs to be found, and where this image came from- 217.43.58.131 10:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ryan sheishi sole.jpg[edit]

Image:Ryan sheishi sole.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Godhunter (notify | contribs).
  • This image is supposed to be a painting from a place does not exsist. Its origin is unknown its source and real license needs to be found.- 217.43.58.131 10:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CumShot.jpg[edit]

Image:CumShot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cblueskysky (notify | contribs).

Comment Image is also currently orphaned, as it only appeared in Cum shot and has since been removed. --carelesshx talk 01:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Wikipedia is not censored. Although we seem to have an unwritten policy against photographic evidence of human sexual behaviour.--Nydas(Talk) 19:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Awesome I think it might be worth noting that the nominator orphaned the image. See here. -- Ben 00:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Legally we probably need 2257 information if this image is to be kept. But I'm not sure. Godwin might shed some light. WilyD 01:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Elovejoy.jpg[edit]

Image:Elovejoy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AlexPlank (notify | contribs).
  • do we even know who this person is? the image description page is extremely confusing an dit's not used in any articles Calliopejen1 00:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wappen_au.gif[edit]

Image:Wappen_au.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aschmid (notify | contribs).
  • no source, don't know what it is, no way to figure out what it is Calliopejen1 01:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - it's the coat of arms of Au in der Hallertau, but the commons already has a better version. — PhilHibbs | talk 14:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dcbruell.jpg[edit]

Image:Dcbruell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AlexPlank (notify | contribs).
  • orphan, no info to determine encyclopedic use Calliopejen1 01:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Kabul_Terry_Fox_Run.jpg[edit]

Image:Kabul_Terry_Fox_Run.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DoubleBlue (notify | contribs).
  • this nonfree image is not necessary to demonstrate the run - these runs happen all the time all over the world - or the person (who is living and could have another photo) Calliopejen1 04:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the photo illustrates both the first ever Terry Fox Run in Kabul, Afghanistan and Andrew Leslie's leadership role. No free alternative is available. DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • You have not explained how this image contributes to the reader's understanding of the Terry Fox Run better than "In 200-, the first Terry Fox Run was held in Afghanistan" or how how it contributes to the reader's understanding of Andrew Leslie better than "Andrew Leslie was instrumental in organizing the first Terry Fox Run in Afghanistan." Calliopejen1 16:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. Image is not significant to either article it was used in. -Nv8200p talk 03:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:NETO_25_cool.jpg[edit]

Image:NETO_25_cool.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peter_Eisenburger (notify | contribs).
  • this nonfree image does not contribute significantly to the reader's understanding of the subject Calliopejen1 04:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep; the image illustrates an important stage in the history of the company.--Peter Eisenburger 13:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • This could just as easily be conveyed with, "In 1995, NETO was named one of the 25 best companies by Fortune" or whatever exactly it's commemorating. Calliopejen1 16:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nearly every picture that is used in Wikipedia can be described with words also. - But tell me more about the deletion process. a) Who will delete the image? b) Which roll will the discussion on this page play?--Peter Eisenburger 18:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • Even if there are other images in violation of our policies, that does not matter. (See WP:OTHERSTUFF.) The relevant policy: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Non-free media files are not used if they can be replaced by text that serves a similar function." (WP:NONFREE) Omitting this image would in no way be detrimental to readers' understanding of NETO. The discussion on this page determines whether the image stays or is deleted. An admin will come here at the end of the deletion period and decide whether the image should be deleted based on policy, and then s/he will keep or delete it. Calliopejen1 18:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was discussing your argument "can be replaced by text". And I was not speaking about "images that violate Wikipedia's policies" (that you come to defend) but about images. - So the game goes this way: you tag the image and another (?) admin comes and deletes it. Not many people involved in the process. --Peter Eisenburger 20:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. -Nv8200p talk 03:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Dc5.jpg[edit]

Image:Dc5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Beachnut4 (notify | contribs).
  • The filename does not match the contents of the image. Also, the image is orphaned and seems to have no encyclopedic use. It is also a surprisingly high resolution image. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 05:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - unless we have an article on unusually large breasts that is short of pictures. ☺ — PhilHibbs | talk 10:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not useful, except as PhilHibbs said. Artemis-Arethusa 23:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I'm sorry, but your argument is spurious. Would you delete an image of an overweight person saying, "unless we have an article on unusually fat people that is short of pictures". To delete a photo because of body type smacks of prejudice and other demeaning attitudes. Beachnut4 05:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Clarification: that was a flippant remark, for which I apologise. However the broader point remains, there is no apparent need for this picture, and to answer your counterexample, all redundant pictures should be removed regardless of what they depict. Redundant is redundant. — PhilHibbs | talk 12:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no page links to the image. Also, if of any use, it should have been uploaded to commons. --Vlad|-> 21:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image moved to Commons as Image:Bellydancer costume.jpg. -Nv8200p talk 03:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Ukraine Putin.jpg[edit]

Image:Ukraine Putin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Emax (notify | contribs).
  • Delete, I think Soviet governmental stuff may be PD, but this poster obviously is modified from its original Soviet state :-) Nyttend 22:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Simoncowellam.jpg[edit]

Image:Simoncowellam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Enter Movie (notify | contribs).
  • non-free use image being used to identify living person, replaceable with free use image. Watermark shows americanidol.com as the source. Ejfetters 14:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep How can you tell it's not a free use image? — Enter Movie 21:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • It says americanidol.com at the bottom of the image. Ejfetters 21:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, who knows if it will be replaced, but it definitely could be. Nyttend 22:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • But how does that prove it's not a free use image? — Enter Movie 00:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Do you own americanidol.com? Do you own the copyright for the photo? Photos with watermarks and captions aren't allowed. It's non-free use. Ejfetters 18:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Josephine_Baker,_1975.JPG[edit]

Image:Josephine_Baker,_1975.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrlopez2681 (notify | contribs).
  • we already have plenty of free images of josephine baker, and it's not necessary to have this specific image of her last show Calliopejen1 14:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bakerl.jpg[edit]

Image:Bakerl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrlopez2681 (notify | contribs).
  • we already have plenty of free images of josephine baker, and this doesn't contribute to the article and is being used in a gallery Calliopejen1 14:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:SimonCowell.JPG[edit]

Image:SimonCowell.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tratare (notify | contribs).
  • Previously nominated, renominating, reason - image is not notable enough to justify it identifying the subject in the manner it is - it is non-free use, and replaceable with free use. He is no different in the show than he is in real-world, and there is nothing notable in the image that contributes to the article that can't be replaced with free use. Ejfetters 14:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - this could definitely be replaced with a real-life picture of Cowell. Calliopejen1 15:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep The image is Simon Cowell in real life. — Enter Movie 21:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • But, the image is a replaceable non-free use image, WP:FU states that if a free use image can be obtained, then we can't use the fair use image. We need a free use image of him. See WP:FU Ejfetters 21:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I think “in real life” in his context means “not on a copyrighted television programme”. — PhilHibbs | talk 08:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep - I don't think the use of this image breaks any rules. I think it should be noted that this user has tried to get rid of this picture once already, which didn't work. [1] I don't know if there are rules about continually trying to get rid of images once decisions have been made on them staying, but I would think it could be considered disruption. For one, he even wrote this [2] on how he changed his mind and wanted the picture kept on the page. ByeNow 21:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment Image was not deleted because I withdrew my nomination, that is the only reason if you look at the end result. I have been notified as to another reason why this image is not proper, because it is replaceable with a free use image, and it is not notable as being non-free use. We just need to find a non-free use image to replace this. I rest my case now indefinitely and await a response to avoid further draw out discussions that just walk around in circles. Ejfetters 00:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • You've got your “not”s in a knot, don't you mean “was not deleted” and “need to find a free-use image”? — PhilHibbs | talk 08:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete per WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 12:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: the fair use rationale given below the tag seems to be good, but there's no way of getting around the policy that prohibits fair use images of living people that are being used simply to illustrate what the person looks like. Nyttend 16:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deleted. use of the image violates NFCC #1 and # 8. -Nv8200p talk 03:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Ytftyfyhtg.JPG[edit]

Image:Ytftyfyhtg.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrlopez2681 (notify | contribs).
  • we already have plenty of free images of josephine baker, e.g. this portrait Image:Josephinebaker.jpg Calliopejen1 14:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • instead of being so bent on having this image deleted, why dont you try and assist me in finding a way to keep it on here. Mrlopez2681 00:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is no way to keep it according to WP:NONFREE, because it is copyrighted. The alternative is to include the FREE portrait of Baker. Calliopejen1 16:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Funeral_of_Josephine_Baker,_1975.JPG[edit]

Image:Funeral_of_Josephine_Baker,_1975.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrlopez2681 (notify | contribs).
  • no need to have a photo of this funeral, when a textual description is perfectly adequate. the article already has plenty of free photos Calliopejen1 14:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • image is an adequate visual display of the funeral. It is your own opinion that this photo is not required - I was under the impression that a 'fair use' photo can be added if the text discusses some aspect of what is displayed in the photo. It will not hurt anyone by having it up nor it will it infringe on anyone who might possibly have a copyright. Fair use tags state - "To illustrate the subject in question when no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information."

User:Calliopejen1 needs to go rummage through some other articles for non-free images that actually might "hurt" wikipedia. --Mrlopez2681 00:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It seems Calliopejen1's standard argument now that "text also can describe" the content of the photo. Then 99% of the images on Wikipedia could be deleted. But an an image describes things in another, additional way. - What an impressive photo of the funeral.--Peter Eisenburger 06:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not just a standard argument, this is policy. From WP:NONFREE: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Non-free media files are not used if they can be replaced by text that serves a similar function." This image does not "significantly increase readers' understanding" of Josephine Baker. Calliopejen1 18:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The picture increases my understanding about the importance of Josephine Baker significantly. And I am a reader and a contributor of English and German Wikipedia. - See my answer above concerning your argumentation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Eisenburger (talk • contribs) 20:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Degrassi images, 3rd time[edit]

SPEEDY DELETE - this is the third time the same user just reuploads deleted images after they have been deleted. Maybe notify the user that this is not allowed? These are the exact same images, and the exact same image names, please speedy delete. Ejfetters 14:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Laet1.jpg[edit]

Image:Laet1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BorisFromStockdale (notify | contribs).
  • Copyvio. Image page claims it has been released into public domain, but in fact the page it comes from has a copyright notice.[3] Rubble pile 15:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cuckoo.gif[edit]

Image:Cuckoo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Perl (notify | contribs).
  • orphan, no way to verify it is public domain Calliopejen1 16:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mib_color1_quasinatural-B011R1_br.jpg[edit]

Image:Mib_color1_quasinatural-B011R1_br.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Perl (notify | contribs).
  • orphan, not enough info to determine encyclopedic use, no source Calliopejen1 16:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Us_illinois_chicago-l.gif[edit]

Image:Us_illinois_chicago-l.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Davodd (notify | contribs).

Image:Progesterone.png[edit]

Image:Progesterone.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mykhal (notify | contribs).

Image:Bsbpromo.jpg[edit]

Image:Bsbpromo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Faisalthe01 (notify | contribs).
  • Replaceable non-free use image of a band 74.204.40.46 17:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thiophene.PNG[edit]

Image:Thiophene.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bensaccount (notify | contribs).

Image:Greecethroughyears.png[edit]

Image:Greecethroughyears.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Maggas (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic, tasteless political userspace joke. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A window to agia sofia.jpg[edit]

Image:A window to agia sofia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aristovoul0s (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic, politically divisive and potentially offensive userspace statement. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UNTourguideDPI.jpg[edit]

Image:UNTourguideDPI.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rodsan18 (notify | contribs).
  • we have a free picture of a modern tour guide, no need to have this nonfree old picture Calliopejen1 18:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UNTourguideDPI1950s.jpg[edit]

Image:UNTourguideDPI1950s.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rodsan18 (notify | contribs).
  • we have a free picture of a modern tour guide, no need to have this nonfree old picture Calliopejen1 18:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UNTourguideDPIBenetton.jpg[edit]

Image:UNTourguideDPIBenetton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rodsan18 (notify | contribs).
  • we have a free picture of a modern tour guide, no need to have this nonfree old picture Calliopejen1 18:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UNTourguideDPIBenetton.jpg[edit]

Image:UNTourguideDPIBenetton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rodsan18 (notify | contribs).
  • we have a free picture of a modern tour guide, no need to have this nonfree old picture Calliopejen1 18:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UNTourguideDPIEdithHead.jpg[edit]

Image:UNTourguideDPIEdithHead.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rodsan18 (notify | contribs).
  • we have a free picture of a modern tour guide, no need to have this nonfree old picture Calliopejen1 18:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UNTourguideDPICDior.jpg[edit]

Image:UNTourguideDPICDior.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rodsan18 (notify | contribs).
  • we have a free picture of a modern tour guide, no need to have this nonfree old picture Calliopejen1 18:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ArmyCommand.jpg[edit]

Image:ArmyCommand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leblebi (notify | contribs).


Image:Dr. Rock.gif[edit]

Image:Dr. Rock.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bradroenfeldt (notify | contribs).
  • Appears to be a low-resolution screenshot, not a self-made work as the license claims. Moreover, used solely on an article about a media show that has been twice deleted and is now on AFD. Nyttend 20:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2007_September_17&oldid=1068652721"