Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 February 24
February 24
[edit]- Image:GurselWavingGoodbye.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DADASHIM (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation. Tagged fair use, {{PD-TR-Gov}}, and PD-self. The image fails WP:NFCC#3 since there are many images like this one in the article. It is not Public domain since it can't be 70 years since it was published, and the PD-self claim is at best dubious. Rettetast (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If the image was in the public domain in its home country as of 1996, then {{PD-US-1996}} would apply whether or not the 70 years has passed. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:CemalGursel_Inauguration.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DADASHIM (notify | contribs).
- fair use overuse Rettetast (talk) 00:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:PresidentCGursel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DADASHIM (notify | contribs).
- fair ue overuse. There are way to many fair use images depicting only how the person looks like in the article. Rettetast (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:The Palms Shopping Centre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smoth 007 (notify | contribs).
- I don't think this qualifies as a logo... Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Sorry I don't see why not. I used the same rationale used in Image:Wem_logo.png. Should I have used a Non-free logo rationale, perhaps?--James Bond (talk) 01:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question - what about the image makes you think it's not a logo? Guest9999 (talk) 03:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; the image is a logo; however, it fails the fair use criteria as it is not a low-resolution image (it is far from that). --Coredesat 03:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If it helps I've converted it to a smaller SVG vector version The Palms Shopping Centre.svg. --WebHamster 05:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Gursel_ParliamentGuards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DADASHIM (notify | contribs).
- see above Rettetast (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:CemalGursel_Parade.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DADASHIM (notify | contribs).
- see above Rettetast (talk) 00:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Seal Don Bosco Technical College.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scorpion prinz (notify | contribs).
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was It's on commons. Take it there. --Haemo (talk) 05:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Table Dance by David Shankbone.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by David Shankbone (notify | contribs).
- Image claims to show subject table dancing but there is not really any way of verifying this, as such it could potentailly violate WP:BLP. Maybe the person is just climbing up/over the bar, maybe they're screwing in a light bulb, from the picture it is impossible to tell and there are no reilable sources to confirm the description. There may well be personality rights issues with the photo it seems to have little encyclopaedic value, not being a good representation of what it is meant to illustrate. Guest9999 (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral, I really don't think BLP is an issue here, as no one is identified in the image. However, the image isn't a very good illustration of the topic. I'm not sure I'd want to argue for deletion unless it can be superseded by a better image. --Coredesat 03:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
POINT OF ORDER: THIS IMAGE IS HOSTED ON COMMONS, NOT WIKIPEDIA. THIS SHOULD BE SPEEDY CLOSED IMMEDIATELY. If you got issues with the image, take it to Commons. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 04:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- Image:2004_USA_election_by_county_map_percentage.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lucky Mitch (notify | contribs).
- This image seems biased in that there are five shades of red and only four shades of blue. D'Agosta (talk) 04:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Based on the description, the missing shade of blue would be for Kerry winning with 90+% of the vote - perhaps there really were no counties where Kerry won by such a large margin? —Random832 09:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep as per Random832's rationale. The criteria for each color are clearly laid out in the caption. Horologium (talk) 17:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is an orphan. -Nv8200p talk 02:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:GoldCoastGalaxyColours.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chuq (notify | contribs).
- superseded by GoldCoastGalaxyColours.png (note capitals) -- Chuq (talk) 10:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Errr, this is on Commons, not Wikipedia. --WebHamster 14:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Argh ... teach me to edit late at night.. -- Chuq (talk) 22:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Trevor - The Dark Lord.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Black Knight09 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, unencyclopedic Cenarium (talk) 13:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Floraliusplurrr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Superman442272947 (notify | contribs).
- Unused. Previously used in Hat World with the caption "Lids #5902 Official Store Mascot Mr. Floralius Plurrr sits on the store's embroidery machine." This doesn't seem to be a notable or verifiable fact, so I removed a section about this little green bear and also a paragraph about one store manager's opinion about his store's great customer service [1]. —Bkell (talk) 14:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Mos_Def_Rock_The_Bells.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Computerdefinitions (notify | contribs).
- No source information. RobbertSH (talk) 16:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:KennedyGurselTimes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DADASHIM (notify | contribs).
- fair use overuse. image not important in the article Rettetast (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Nicholes nightmare.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timtim10 (notify | contribs).
- Image from speedily deleted article Nicole heydon Roleplayer (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Pavanar from TamilVU.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Acrajan (notify | contribs).
- Too many assumptions in rationale Relata refero (talk) 18:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably a personal image of the uploader. Unencyclopedic. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Beetexcellioncopieog1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marth555pete (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Summary says "educational purposes only" and there is no evidence copyright holder released the image under he GFDL as claimed. Nv8200p talk 21:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Beginning.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chefperson (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, No evidence copyright holder granted permission to use under the GFDL as claimed. Nv8200p talk 21:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Belle_Toute_Lighthouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rwassell (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: nomination withdrawn. Use restriction removed by uploader. -Nv8200p talk 12:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Permission granted for educational use only. Nv8200p talk 21:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This is my photo, I'm allowing it's use on Wikipedia.--Rtphokie (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Allowing it, but limiting its use too. This is not normally acceptable under GFDL. If you leave the permission section empty it defers to the licence you have chosen. By stating specifically "permission granted for use on Wikipedia" this means you are giving permission for use on Wikipedia only. Click on the "Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" link on the image page and you will see that the license you have chosen allows the image to be used and/or edited anywhere (but attribution must be given to you), but by making your statement you are limiting its use to WP. Confusing I know, but if you are okay with the license you have chosen then no other permissions are needed. --WebHamster 01:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand that copyright is a thorny issue but it desperately needs to be made more user friendly on Wikipedia for editors who want to contribute. It's my photo and I want to allow it to be used on Wikipedia. Please remove this tag.--Rtphokie (talk) 01:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you only want it to be used on Wikipedia then you've chosen the wrong licence and more than likely the image will be deleted, sorry. --WebHamster 02:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- what license would you recommend?--Rtphokie (talk) 02:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Ben_Malek_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khansajed (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Ben-header.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cameron.diane (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 22:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Beerandgamenight.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bollocks123 (notify | contribs).
- Nonencyclopedic image used in a hoax article. Justin Eiler (talk) 22:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Orphan, low resolution Nv8200p talk 22:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Berlinpanorama.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lear_21 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low resolution Nv8200p talk 23:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:TTUvBU.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wordbuilder (notify | contribs).
- I uploaded this image and want it deleted from Wikipedia. It is currently orphaned here and there is already a copy on Wikimedia Commons. →Wordbuilder (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 23:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Nv8200p talk 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, image is now used. MECU≈talk 15:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Berverly_perdue_nc_politician.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jerimee (notify | contribs).
*Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low resolution Nv8200p talk 23:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Isn't this image, admittedly low quality, better than no image at all for Beverly Perdue? Jerimee (talk) 22:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, used in Beverly Perdue. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn. -Nv8200p talk 02:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Besms1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BesnikBelegu (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 23:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete.(non admin close)
--Undeath (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Best_InLine_Skates.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allterraskates (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, watermarked, advertisement, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 23:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.