Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 March 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 23 March 25 >

March 24[edit]

Image:Comint-switzerland.jpg[edit]

Image:Comint-switzerland.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schutz (notify | contribs).

Image:Drift screen.JPG[edit]

Image:Drift screen.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Somewhere123 (notify | contribs).
  • Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 00:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not only orphaned, but would need trimmed due to excessive white areas around the screenshot. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 03:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eiffel_Tower_New_Year2007.jpg[edit]

Image:Eiffel_Tower_New_Year2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Prashant_bala (notify | contribs).

Image:Lifehouse.jpg[edit]

Image:Lifehouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ckmaharg (notify | contribs).
  • Replaceable non-free use image. Band still together, and still active, free image is available, and fact that one is not here does not permit non-free images to be used. Ejfetters (talk) 02:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:14 jennylee lgl.jpg[edit]

Image:14 jennylee lgl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pseudotype (notify | contribs).
  • Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 02:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BRITDOC FILM FESTIVAL.png[edit]

Image:BRITDOC FILM FESTIVAL.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Charlottedale (notify | contribs).
  • Unused, unlikely to be of encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CraigTurnbull1.jpg[edit]

Image:CraigTurnbull1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brow69 (notify | contribs).

Image:Beijing2008GamesOverlogo.jpg[edit]

Image:Beijing2008GamesOverlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deeptrivia (notify | contribs).
  • What makes this image PD? -Nard 03:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the source of the image clearly encouraging people to "Download this image and put it everywhere!" deeptrivia (talk) 16:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Commons image showing through. -Nv8200p talk 01:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DFA Ringle.jpg[edit]

Image:DFA Ringle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anthonyd3ca (notify | contribs).
  • Unnotable non-free use album cover, hardly differs from Image:GoodCharlotte-DanceFloorAnthem.jpg , not noteworthy enough, and not needed, first image is good enough 74.204.40.46 (talk) 05:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This image is higher resolution that the other. I'm not sure if it's large enough to be too high-res for fair-use, however. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 03:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yonas Hailemeskel Image.JPG[edit]

Image:Yonas Hailemeskel Image.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yonas Hailemeskel Image (notify | contribs).
  • UE. Not used anywhere and probably just spam for the website listed. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FullThrottleFury.jpg[edit]

Image:FullThrottleFury.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tom Banks (notify | contribs).

Image:FullThrottleSugarFree.jpg[edit]

Image:FullThrottleSugarFree.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tom Banks (notify | contribs).

Image:Embryo4.jpg[edit]

Image:Embryo4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RG04 (notify | contribs).
  • No copyright information supplied for a rather obviously owned image Bueller 007 (talk) 08:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Applications of artificial intelligence.pdf[edit]

Image:Applications of artificial intelligence.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ibr afah (notify | contribs).

Image:Azipod Project Guide 4-1-0.pdf[edit]

Image:Azipod Project Guide 4-1-0.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Corkstera (notify | contribs).

Image:BELBIC full text.pdf[edit]

Image:BELBIC full text.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leeder78 (notify | contribs).

Image:Antenna paper.pdf[edit]

Image:Antenna paper.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jeevan Vemagiri (notify | contribs).

Image:Dignetbk.pdf[edit]

Image:Dignetbk.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Benschop (notify | contribs).

Image:Thestratonks.jpg[edit]

Image:Thestratonks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:QueenSupreme89 (notify | contribs).
  • Image is a screenshot but is not licenced as such -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 11:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BIOSTEEL.pdf[edit]

Image:BIOSTEEL.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arundhati_bakshi (notify | contribs).

Image:ComponentLevel.pdf[edit]

Image:ComponentLevel.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lihsien (notify | contribs).
  • Original research, Orphaned, Absent uploader MER-C 12:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DRAM_Circuit_System_Test_Experience.pdf[edit]

Image:DRAM_Circuit_System_Test_Experience.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lihsien (notify | contribs).
  • Original research, Orphaned, Absent uploader MER-C 12:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mymathproject.pdf[edit]

Image:Mymathproject.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Berasomnath (notify | contribs).

Image:Nmciswem.pdf[edit]

Image:Nmciswem.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MarkusSchulze (notify | contribs).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was 

Kept.  Imagine is in use, and there's no consensus here that this image exceeds the usual latitude given to images with respect to Original Research. WilyD 17:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aldwych Map Mockup.png[edit]

Image:Aldwych Map Mockup.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by McDRye (notify | contribs).
  • This appears to be original research (WP:NOR), given the material under the summary heading. —TreasuryTag—t—c 13:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly disagree - It's a plain graphic representation of where the station is/was situated, and as such is no different from any other Wiki editor-created map or diagram used in place of copyrighted versions. Nick Cooper (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - it's speculating as to how a station that closed many, many years ago, would fit into our current transport network if it were open. The key words being speculating and if. Such material would require a source (WP:CITE) to show that the way the picture depicts it is indeed the way the map would work. —TreasuryTag—t—c 15:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - As JediLofty has pointed out, the Underground Map/Diagram works to set rules and as this is a case of a station which still exists and much of the infrastructure for it to be operational still in place, there are a very limited number of ways in which is would be represented. 86.140.196.181 has shown how it was represented when still open, and you will see that it is essentially the same as the disputed image, with the exception of the line being "dotted," which is the standard way of indicating a peak-time only service, although there are plenty of historic examples of it not being "dotted," as well. The branch consists of a single line and for virtually all its working life was operated by a single shuttle train running between Holborn and Aldwych (as it was at the time of 86.140.196.181's example), hence it is not shown as linking directly into Piccadilly line proper, even though in practical terms it is for the purposes of stock movement. If the station was still open now, it can be said with virtually absolute certainty that it would still be a shuttle, and would appear on the map as suggested. Nick Cooper (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree - I think the idea of having an image of what it would look like on today's map is a great idea. It visually helps the mind imagine where it is. The said graphic could be improved though and taking into account Transport for London is publicly owned it could in fact be in the public interest to use a section of the copyrighted map to represent realistically where Aldwych station is located. An example of how this would look can be found here http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/9227/aldwychft9.jpg
Alternatively a section of a 1993/1994 could equally be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.196.181 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 24 March 2008
Disagree - the image is specifically relevant to the Aldwych tube station article and shows the location of a now-closed railway station in relation to still-existing stations on the same network. Such use is documented at Wikipedia:WikiProject_London_Transport/Manual_of_style#Disused_Stations. Bazza (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The London Underground map is pretty iconic, with predictable methods for adding new stations. The image does a very good job of illustrating how the Aldwych station would look on a current LU map if the station was still open. While it is a user created image, I don't see that WP:OR can apply here. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 13:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
illustrating how the Aldwych station would look on a current LU map if the station was still open - how do you know this? —TreasuryTag—t—c 17:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because the way stations are added to the LU map is predictable. If you know what station it is next to, and what line the station serves/served, it can only really be added to the map one way!-- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 09:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- it is helpful and useful and personally I think it is quite interesting to see how it would look on a modern map. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.15.51 (talk) 16:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Image:DaBrat.jpg[edit]

Image:DaBrat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shine_77 (notify | contribs).
  • Appears to be the work of a professional photographer and taken in a studio - copyright probably not owned by uploader. PhilKnight (talk) 14:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The image appears to have been lifted from this site.-- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 16:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Elvismccartney.jpg[edit]

Image:Elvismccartney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mr._Manu (notify | contribs).
  • Several free images are used in the article - this doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ozmir.jpg[edit]

Image:Ozmir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by QueenSupreme89 (notify | contribs).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was 

discussion closed as image is at Commons, not Wikipedia. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 16:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cursive.png[edit]

Image:Cursive.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sotakeit (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Haifa.jpg[edit]

Image:Haifa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aprodigy9 (notify | contribs).
  • Not in use, can't see potential reason to use it in any article, name not representative, low quality Ynhockey (Talk) 18:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Commons showing through. 20:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Shauna Danielle (fishnet).jpg[edit]

Image:Shauna Danielle (fishnet).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stoneworx7 (notify | contribs).

Image:2.2.08_Spikeball_Logo.jpg[edit]

Image:2.2.08_Spikeball_Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chrisruder (notify | contribs).
  • Not used, probably not ensyclopedic, as far as I can tell we have no article about this Spikeball organization. Sherool (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AFF.jpg[edit]

Image:AFF.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Redscar13 (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nilfanion (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The image has been uploaded for the heck of it, Wikipedia is not an image hosting site. Jammy (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was 

Deleted.  With images labelled as free on commons, that are at least freer (whatever copyright/trademark/et cetera exists on the design, this image is additionally encumbered by the photographer's copyright), there's no basis for retaining this image. WilyD 18:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dalek.jpg[edit]

Image:Dalek.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alan-WK (notify | contribs).
  • Image is currently being falsely used under Fair Use - there are at least 8 free images in the Commons here of Daleks to choose from. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 00:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Presuming the images on the commons are genuinely free, and haven't been uploaded in error, then exterminate, replaceable. PhilKnight (talk) 01:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep images on Commons should be deleted because Daleks are still copyrighted characters. Alientraveller (talk) 09:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So far as I know, taking a photograph of a copyrighted object is the copyright of the photographer, not the copyright holder of the object. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is some explanation here.--PhilKnight (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep BBC don't care if people use their images. And this image is the only image of the updated Dalek as all the others are old versions of the Dalek. Jammy (talk) 10:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Jammy. —TreasuryTag—t—c 10:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2008_March_24&oldid=1050190214"