Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Image:Olympic fireworks.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Olympic fireworks[edit]

Fireworks over the Sydney Harbour Bridge during closing ceremonies of the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney, Australia.

I think it's a very nice quality picture, with vibrant colours and nice reflections on the water.

Nominated by
Save-Me-Oprah(talk) 22:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • It's a cool picture, but I don't think it warrants a FPC for two reasons. It's fairly grainy, and also, what exactly is the encyclopedic value of the photograph? Also, the composition might be a problem as well. --Hetar 00:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've cropped some of the black out and reduced the noise. Save-Me-Oprah(talk) 21:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's a pretty photo but there's a few things that can't be corrected that may be issues at FPC. All the red going off to the left of the image (I'm not even sure what it is, probably smoke, but why's it red? That's not that important really). Anyway, to me it helps make the image look unbalanced - I want to see more of it but it just cuts off. I see you've cropped to include the Opera House, but that comes up very dark, and adds to the unbalanced feel, as the lit up bridge is so much more visually dominant. If the image was cropped just to the bridge without worrying about the dark opera house sails at the left, it may feel better balanced - just a suggestion, not sure how well it would work. It also appears that the fireworks and smoke (?) are pretty badly motion blurred - this is not easy to avoid when taking fireworks at night as the shutter speed will tend to adjust for the darkness and be quite slow, thus the fast moving fireworks will blur, and if you manually set for the fireworks, everything else tends to come out really dark. It's a pretty hard balance. I waffled a lot here I think, but some just some ideas to consider. Thanks, --jjron (talk) 10:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seconder