Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

[edit]

Uncontroversial technical requests

[edit]
  • Sanjna  Samjna (goddess) (currently a redirect back to Sanjna) (move · discuss) – more common transliteration of the name, evident by the usage in various sources of the article Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 06:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the title of the article should be fixed as requested, but I wonder if "goddess" is the proper disambiguator. The suggestion seems fine but there might be a guideline that I can't find. Meanwhile, this goddess could possibly receive the main Samjna namespace, which currently redirects to Samjna (concept), if the goddess is considered the primary topic. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:29, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Doomsdayer520, I did quick search on google books, and yeah, majority of results were about the goddess [1], though I don't know to determine primary in this case Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 17:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rn, it would be best to move the article, turn the page Samjna into a disam Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 18:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

[edit]

Contested technical requests

[edit]
@Versace1608 Both the suburb and the song get around 1000 pageviews per month, it's not clear which is the primary topic. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
15:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If we're keeping the dabpage, then it will need to be moved back to Ojuelegba. OP, such primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@162 etc. I moved the dabpage back pending consensus on a primary topic. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
15:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ahecht: The suburb/town Ojuelegba predates the song and is the primary topic. Page views are irrelevant and I'm not sure why you're making it a primary argument. For people living in Ojuelegba and Nigeria at large, the town is what comes to mind when they hear the term Ojuelegba. I lived in Lagos for a couple of years and I can attest to this. In my opinion, it doesn't make sense to name the disambiguation page Ojuelegba.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 14:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, but this is Wikipedia, and there are rules. See WP:DPT and WP:PCM 162 etc. (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Versace1608 I'm not saying that one topic or the other is or isn't primary, just that it's not clear cut enough to be done as an uncontroversial move. You can click on the "discuss" link in your request above to open a move discussion, and make sure to notify Talk:Ojuelegba (song) as well. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nurg I don't think the "distinct" part of WP:DIFFCAPS is met here, and Polynesian mythology is probably still the primary topic for the title-case title. Worth a discussion at least. C F A 💬 15:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also oppose this. 162 etc. (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MGAMarCommRanha See WP:OFFICIALNAME. C F A 💬 14:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Decapod  Decapod (disambiguation) (currently a redirect back to Decapod) (move · discuss) – 'Decapod (disambiguation)' was created for the express purpose of redirecting to 'Decapod'. However, 'Decapod' clearly has a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. 'Decapod' is the common name for the order Decapoda that houses all crabs, all shrimp, all prawns, all lobsters, and all crayfish. There are thousands of articles that fall under Decapoda and whose subjects can be called decapods. I've seen at this point several dozen wikilinks formatted as [[Decapoda|decapod]] because we direct to a disambig instead of a PT. At the bare minimum, even if a PT somehow isn't established, 'Decapod' would point to 'Decapod (disambiguation)', not vice-versa. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 08:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheTechnician27 There has been a silent consensus for nearly twenty years, so I don't think this is necessarily uncontroversial. You can open a discussion by clicking the "discuss" link next to your request. C F A 💬 14:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KingArti There's no need to move this now, as the draft approver can move it to the appropriate title when it is moved out of draftspace. That said, the previous films are not consistent: there is Scream 4 and Scream VI. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KingArti Also, the Instagram post that announced the release date used "Scream 7", not "Scream VII". --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nodicenomasters The video game article seems to be the primary topic with 13,600 page views per month, vs 620 for role-playing games and 2,400 for the movie --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
00:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tomo.s.429; can you provide some independent, secondary sources using the new name? Sennecaster (Chat) 02:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tomo.s.429 Is the new name "JR Tokai Transport Service Company" or "JR-Central Transport Service Company"? In any case, Tokai Transport Service Company seems to be the WP:COMMONNAME for now. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
13:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

[edit]