Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Firestone 2

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Successful

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Firestone Tire and Rubber Company2.0[edit]

view edit delete watch
Filed: 06:40, February 6 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties[edit]

travb (talk · contribs)
Mobile 01 (talk · contribs)
RebelAt (talk · contribs)
Fairness And Accuracy For All (talk · contribs)
Bobblehead (talk · contribs)
Morton_devonshire (talk · contribs)
Cls14 (talk · contribs)

Articles involved[edit]

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:[edit]

WP:Third opinion [1]
Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Bridgestone_and_Firestone
Conversation on Firestone
Merge discussion on Bridgestone talk page
Merge discussion on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company
Discusion underway with several of the editors mentioned above on the Firestone talk page. Sand Box article set up to address POV issues and Generally tidy and improve a messy article.

Issues to be mediated[edit]

Is Bridgestone now the same company as Firestone?
- Should the Firestone page be merged into the Bridgestone page?
- Should the 1900-1988 History of Firestone in USA be Merged into the history of Bridgestone Corporation Japan.
Should the Firestone Liberian controversy remain in the main article or be split?
- Does the Liberian Workers Claim against Firestone deserve to have it's own expanded article.
- Is it sufficient to paragraph the Liberian issue in the Firestone article and reference out to the split.
What is a NPOV source?

Additional issues to be mediated[edit]

Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate[edit]

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. Travb (talk) 06:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Mobile 01^Talk 07:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Cls14 11:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. MortonDevonshire Yo · 00:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. ~ (The Rebel At) ~ 22:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. --Bobblehead 20:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - FAAFA 00:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]

Accept:

For the Mediation Committee, Shyam ^(T/C) 07:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ill take it. -Ste|vertigo

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.