Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old. |
Autopatrolled
- SerChevalerie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sir MemeGod (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been an editor since 2020, but only really started ramping up my edits in February of this year. I have made 320+ pages (at least 4 of them are from redirects), 166+ of which have been in the last 6 days (as of August 29). Another user (Ryan shell) suggested that I should apply. The only major issue that my articles have had in the past was me using AI, which I have acknowledged was wrong and promised not to do it again to an administrator, who worked with me on how to properly find info for articles without using AI. Most of my articles are stubs, and I feel like they can clog up the New Pages Feed a bit. Since I know this will be brought up, of the 4 pages I have started that have been deleted, one was an April Fools joke page that I didn't realize wasn't allowed, one was from an AfD, and the other two are from the above AI issue. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done. The concerns from the previous decline are still a bit too recent considering this permission which essentially says that your articles don't need a second pair of eyes. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ktkvtsh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Experienced and frequent editor. Knowledgeable in article creation and assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Ktkvtsh: Would you care to explain why you think your creation Mario Acampa was recently deleted at AfD? Additionally, could you explain how Boler's Inn passes the notability guideline for buildings? None of the three sources cited seem to have the significant coverage required to meet the guideline's standard. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I created Mario Acampa as a translation from Italian when I first started editing. I was not fully aware of all standards and guidelines at that time.
- For Boler's Inn, I believe that it qualified due to it's listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Ktkvtsh (talk) 14:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. It's generally accepted that a property on the NHRP is thoroughly documented, or it wouldn't have been listed in the first place. The nomination form lists 14 sources in its Bibliography section. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'd missed WP:MAPOUTCOMES earlier. I don't have any further concerns! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. It's generally accepted that a property on the NHRP is thoroughly documented, or it wouldn't have been listed in the first place. The nomination form lists 14 sources in its Bibliography section. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. I'm concerned that a lot of your articles are very short (barely a sentence or two) and BLPs at that. I'd prefer to see some experience creating more substantial articles and fleshing out thin ones before saying that your creations don't require any input from patrollers whatsoever. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Floppykart (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets minimum critera, prolific article creator, with no articles ever deleted (or even nominated for deletion, AFAICT). Mach61 23:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
