Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 November 30

< November 29	December 1 >

November 30[edit]

Template:All-rounders-Triple[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Merge. The text of the template has been placed on the talk page of the template it has been requested to have been merged with. This template will now be deleted. RyanGerbil10(Four more years!) 01:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:All-rounders-Triple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Has no real purpose except to add clutter to the handful of articles linked. It is a partial and unnecessary duplicate of Template:All-rounders-Double (which is useful). Pointless. ---BlackJack | ^{talk page} 21:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. It would be easy to asterisk the names of the handful who have the "triple" (so named) and add a line explaining the asterisk at the bottom of the "double" template (Vettori will hopefully join the group very soon). The triple usually means 1000 runs, 100 wickets, and 100 catches anyway. Grutness...wha? 22:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'd go along with that subject to consensus. You are right about the meaning of "triple" too. ---BlackJack | ^{talk page} 09:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Agree with the proposal to merge with the double template. Jonesy (talk) 10:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:My Girl character map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was subst and delete --Magioladitis (talk) 10:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:My Girl character map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary as a template, and only one transclusion. Doesn't look particuarly useful anyway; the article already has a cast list, and it isn't really relevant to know who played who in the remake, which has its own article. PC78 (talk) 19:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - This should not be in the template space. It's not even a template. It's a section from the only article it's relevant to, and should be editable from the article. لenna vecia 01:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - The character list/"template" provides no use especially since the Philipino version of the series has its own article.Gron01 (talk) 04:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UKLobbies[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete --The Helpful One 21:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UKLobbies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

consists entirely of American lobbies with no UK lobbying organization included. Hence unencyclopedic/ gibberish/irrelevant/misleading or whatever you will. But shouldn't be up in Wikipedia. Delete Smerus (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also by the way it only links to one article.--Smerus (talk) 17:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No point in this template, considering how limited the actual wiki article on lobbying in the UK is i dont see the need for it. It would be far more productive to expand that page mentioning the different lobbying groups in the UK linking to their articles, rather than a template. BritishWatcher (talk) 00:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but without prejudice. The history suggests that the person who made the template was using the US one as a starting-off point, but never got around to finishing it. Warren -talk- 12:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or move into the creator's user space, if he wants to finish it then return it to the template space. لenna vecia 01:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Klein zach 02:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.