Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 20 April 22 >

April 21[edit]

Template:Infobox fictional family/colour[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-template. Gonnym (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Other uses2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

SEPTA s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

S-line subpages

Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/SEPTA. All transclusions replaced. I've put the 73 S-line subpages within a collapsed section; they're wholly dependent on the four main templates and should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 16:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ITunes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 28. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Admin tasks[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G7. Deleted by Materialscientist (log entry). (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcoded version of Template:String count, version using that template written at Template:Admin tasks/sandbox. * Pppery * has returned 15:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • support per nom Hhkohh (talk) 22:22, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as creator - I didn't know the String count template existed. Feel free to sync the sandbox and mark the module for speedy deletion as G7 --DannyS712 (talk) 02:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Editnotice load[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module * Pppery * has returned 12:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox D&D deity[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Template:Infobox D&D deity after replacement with Template:Infobox character. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox D&D deity with Template:Infobox character.
Similar to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 12#Template:Infobox D&D character, the deity of D&D should be merged into the general character infobox. image, caption, name, title, home, alignment and first are already present in {{Infobox character}}; setting, alias and myth are not used by any article (though the latter two are both are included in the general infobox, and if "setting" was meant as "series" or "franchise" then that is also available). This leaves |power=, |portfolio=, |domains= and |super=.

|portfolio= seems to be the abilities they use which can be used, similar to fighting styles and weapons for fighting games. Not quite sure if |super= is OR or not, as some of the articles that use it don't even mention the superior or when mentioning it don't reference it being "superior" but either as family or as someone they are affiliated with. If this is important, it can be added, but if it is misused, then both |family= and |affiliation= can be used instead. |domains= seem ripe for WP:OR as its a laundry list that is usually absent from the rest of the article and should probably not be merged. Likewise |power= should not be merged as too in-universe trivia. Gonnym (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Orphan and delete. Most of the items not already in Infobox character seem to be thoroughly in-universe topics that should be ignored as fancruft. I suppose "setting" would be useful to merge if it were in use, but since it's not being used now, I don't see the point of moving it to another infobox where it won't likely be used. Nyttend (talk) 23:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Infoboxes should not include trivial information. ―Susmuffin Talk 04:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per Gonnym.
  • The "Setting" line can be determined as follows, and become "Series" in the new infobox. Some articles use the version Template:Greyhawk Deity, in which case the series would be World of Greyhawk. Some use Template:Forgotten Realms Deity, which would become Forgotten Realms. Those that simply use Template:D&D Deity do not have a specific setting, so that can either be left blank or converted to something like Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Race should become "Deity" for all, as per Takhisis which was already converted. The rest of the entries (power, portfolio, domains, super) that are not currently used in the main character infobox can be moved to the article text as desired by interested parties by looking at the edit history, but can be ignored during the merging process. BOZ (talk) 23:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Good comments. --Gonnym (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • But if they insist on just deleting the template instead, I suppose I'll have to convert them all myself to "Infobox character" manually. :P BOZ (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nyttend. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 11:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nyttend. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Mundo de Puerto Rico[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nav template with 1 link and 1 redirect to the same article. Does not navigate between anything. Gonnym (talk) 10:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_21&oldid=1091625016"