Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight

Main page   Discussion   Members   Assessment   Open tasks Popular pages   Recognized content     Awards   Portal

Requested move at Talk:Galaxy 2 (disambiguation)#Requested move 14 July 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Galaxy 2 (disambiguation)#Requested move 14 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 22:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Requested merge at Talk:IM-1#Proposed merge of EagleCam into IM-1

Hi, there is a requested merge discussion at Talk:IM-1#Proposed merge of EagleCam into IM-1 which may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. The discussion has been open since the end of February. Thanks, Consigned (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Assistance cleaning up Timeline of Mars 2020?

I'm trying to go through and clean up some articles related to Martian topics and it appears that Timeline of Mars 2020 is a complete mess that lists every single event, day-by-day, of Mars 2020. This one I'm a bit stuck on, since it clearly is a bit of a WP:TNT situation but it's not immediately obvious to me how best to approach it. Would anyone have any time to help me work through this one and clean it up so it passes muster? Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 15:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Not that interested in this article in particular but I'm also noticing that the gallery is huge (it has *subsections*). That probably needs to get TNT-ed or distributed too. Mrfoogles (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Requested move of SpaceX Starship flight test pages

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 4, impacting all of the SpaceX Starship integrated flight test pages, that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

I think this is important to comment on, as again some individuals try to capture discussion on own interpretations. Maybe members of this project also might want to re-consider the "Low‑importance" assessments for all the SpaceX Starship articles. This is the most media commented spaceflight action nowadays, even before Ariane + Artemis (which is dependent on Starship, of course), but rated "low importance" leaves these acticles orphaned, neclected and more or less to a single editor who had put in original reseach and exaggerations while blocking others, especially IPs, from co-editing. The articles suffer greatly. 47.69.66.56 (talk) 10:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

First, stop with the baseless accusations. They aren't constructive.

There also isn't a correlation, AFAIK, between the official article importance and the # of editors working on the article. SpaceX Starship flight tests is a good example; low importance, almost 350 editors have edited it.

For a list of the classification and quality of every Starship article, they are below:

SpaceX Starship: Class B, High Importance. Former "Good article".

SpaceX Super Heavy: Class B, Mid Importance.

SpaceX Starship (spacecraft): Class B, Mid Importance.

Starship HLS: Class C, High importance.

SpaceX Starship flight tests: Class B, Low Importance. (For comparison, List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches is a "featured list", Low Importance)

SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 1: Class C, Not listed in importance. (This should be fixed, and placed at low-mid importance)

SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2: Class C, Low Importance.

SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 3: Class C, Low Importance.

SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 4: Class C, Low Importance.

SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 5: Stub, Low Importance. (This should be mid-high, as this is SpaceX's first attempt to catch a booster)

SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 6: Not listed in quality, Not listed in importance. (This should be fixed, and set to Stub, Low Importance.)

DearMoon project: Start Class, Low Importance.

Rocket Cargo: Class B, Low Importance.

SpaceX Starship design history: Class C, Low Importance

Polaris program: Class C, Mid Importance.

SpaceX Mars Colonization Program: Start Class, Mid Importance.

Blue Origin Federation, LLC v. United States: Stub Class, Low Importance

(Also, just so you are aware, Starship has 0 connection to Ariane. They're direct competitors) Redacted II (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

"First, stop with the baseless accusations. They aren't constructive.

-> what are you doing? Accusing me of claiming Starship-Ariane relations? Like you earlier accused me of changing IPs to appears as diffenet people? I did not accuse anyone in special, but you seem to feel adressed, mabe as you have been cought for "original research multiple times (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:SpaceX_Starship_flight_tests#Dubious_statements_with_even_more_dubious_sources)

I never stated a relation between Ariane and Starship. Just untrue. Re-read and rethink before once more attacking me!

Also, once more you distract from the main topic by dropping lots of links without giving any resonable arguments. 47.64.203.33 (talk) 10:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Just trying to clear up a misconception, after all, you did say: "Ariane + Artemis (which is dependent on Starship, of course)"

As for baseless accusations:

"neclected and more or less to a single editor who had put in original reseach and exaggerations while blocking others, especially IPs, from co-editing"

(And this isn't the location for arguing about the requested move) Redacted II (talk) 11:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

You know the difference between "is" and "are"? Semantics are inportant when reading posts and then commenting (in an aggessive way).

2nd case you did nod read properly: I did not discuss a single word pro or con about the requested move, I just said commenting there was important.

Could you please stop attacking me personally without even reading properly and understanding what I wrote? You do this every time when I comment, or distracting from the main point. 47.64.203.33 (talk) 17:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Direct quotation:

"Also, once more you distract from the main topic by dropping lots of links without giving any resonable arguments"

But this debate is worthless. Redacted II (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

I agree, it's worthless as you are the sole commenter and refuse to read proferly, ignore arguments and insist of diverting from the topic by attacking.

Hope someone else in this hopelessly orphaned and neglected project will read and react. 47.64.203.33 (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

How should time intervals be displayed?

Several articles of interest to this wikiproject use {{time interval}} with |abbr=on. The issue of what should be displayed by this template is being discussed at Module talk:Age#abbr=on violates MOS. Please comment there. Johnuniq (talk) 04:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 4#Requested move 30 July 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 4#Requested move 30 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)