Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey

WT:TURKEY

Turkey Top‑importance

	Turkey portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Top	This page has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia High‑importance

	Asia portal This page is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
High	This page has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Council

This page relates to the WikiProject Council, a collaborative effort regarding WikiProjects in general. If you would like to participate, please visit the project discussion page.CouncilWikipedia:WikiProject CouncilTemplate:WikiProject CouncilCouncil articles

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 91 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Help/feedback with an article?

Hello, I have been working on an article that involves Turkey. However, I do not speak Turkish and don't know where to begin with Turkish-language sources. Is there someone here who would be able and willing to help me on expanding the article? Pietrus1 (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Delight

Selam, A sockpuppet who was evading a block, made many changes to the Turkish Delight page. Due to the complex structure and my lack of experience, I wanted to write here to see if someone can revert the edits according to the guidelines. Thanks in advance.

Also i also tag you incase you are interested, @Beshogur Göycen (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shakshouka has an RfC

Shakshouka has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal at Talk:Akhiya

There is a merge proposal affecting two articles on the same subject, Akhiya and Akhi Brotherhoods. All interested editors are invited to participate in the discussion at Talk:Akhiya#Merge proposal. Constantine ✍ 10:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should all the Turkish wildfire articles be merged?

It would be great to hear your opinion at Talk:2024 Turkey wildfires#Proposal to merge all years into Wildfires in Turkey Chidgk1 (talk) 08:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth of Mustafa I

There appears to have been some edit warring over the date of birth of Mustafa I, currently indicated in the article as c. 1600/1601/ The Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire, p. 409, cited as a source in this article, says: "Mustafa I (b. ca. 1591–d. ca. 1639)". This requires some attention from someone with greater historical expertise on the subject. BD2412 T 18:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sira Aspera, Lynch44, Naşakara, IgnacyPL, Bbb23, and Meleksimasul: Thoughts? BD2412 T 19:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because I was pinged: I have no historical expertise on this subject.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone else? BD2412 T 12:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the contemporary ambassadors referred to Prince Mustafa in the summer of 1603 as a toddler,Baki Tezcan in his book “The Debut of Kösem Sultans political career” debunks idea of Mustafa being born in 1591 Naşakara (talk) 13:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Siege of Szigetvár

Siege of Szigetvár has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]