Jump to content

Haisla language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from X̄enaksialak̓ala language)
Haisla
X̄a'islak̓ala, X̌àh̓isl̩ak̓ala
RegionCentral British Columbia coast inlet, Douglas Channel head, near Kitimat
Ethnicity1,680 Haisla people (2014, FPCC)[1]
Native speakers
240 (2014, FPCC)[1]
Wakashan
  • Northern
    • Haisla
Dialects
  • Kitamaat
  • Kitlope
Language codes
ISO 639-3has
Glottologhais1244
ELPX̄enaksialak̓ala / X̄aislak̓ala (Haisla)
Haisla is classified as Critically Endangered by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger

The Haisla language, (Haisla: X̄aʼislak̓ala / X̌àh̓isl̩ak̓ala, [ˈχaʔislakʼala]), is a First Nations Wakashan language spoken by the Haisla people of the North Coast region of the Canadian province of British Columbia, who are based in the village of Kitamaat.

The name Haisla is derived from the Haisla word xàʼisla or xàʼisəla, meaning 'dwellers downriver'. The Haisla and their language, along with that of the neighbouring Heiltsuk and Wuikinuxv peoples, were in the past incorrectly called "Northern Kwakiutl".

Haisla is currently spoken by several hundred people but it is considered critically endangered. Haisla is geographically the northernmost Wakashan language. Its nearest Wakashan neighbor is Oowekyala.

Dialects

[edit]

The present-day population of Kitamaat developed from multiple sources, and they had language differences among them. The two most prominent are Kitimaat (X̅aʼislakʼala) and Kitlope (X̅enaksialakʼala). Pronunciation, grammar, and word choice depend on which dialect is being spoken.

Haisla is still used to refer to the language as a whole, similar to the way that the term "English" encompasses multiple dialects.

Phonology

[edit]

Haisla is closely related to the other North Wakashan languages, Oowekyala, Heiltsuk, Kwak'wala, and, to a lesser extent, Nuuchahnulth (Nootka), Nitinat, and Makah. Typical of languages spoken on the Northwest Coast, these languages consist of multiple consonants with limited allophonic variation. The phonological inventory is familiar to other Northern Wakashan languages.

Consonants[2]
Bilabial Alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Glottal
central sibilant lateral plain lab. plain lab.
Plosive/
Affricate
voiceless p t ts k q ʔ
aspirated tsʰ tɬʰ kʷʰ qʷʰ
ejective tsʼ tɬʼ kʷʼ qʷʼ
Fricative plain s ɬ x χ χʷ h
glottalized
Sonorant plain m n l j w
glottalized

Haisla has a wide range of consonants, with the plain plosives being either voiced or voiceless. Similar to the other Wakashan languages, Haisla does not have large vowel systems. The vowels seen in the language are /i/, /a/, /u/, /o/, /e/ and /ə/. /ə/ also exists in Kwakwala, and absent from Southern Wakashan languages. The two languages are also characterized by their open /i u/.

Dorsals can either be front /k ɡ x/ or back, /q ɢ χ/, and can also be rounded. Plosives can be further altered by aspiration, glottalization, and voicing. Resonants also experience further augmentation through glottalization. Fricatives and plain plosives are generally aspirated within Northern Wakashan languages, whereas the voiced plosives can be either phonetically voiced or voiceless un-aspirated.

Voicing and glottalization are active components, seen in consonant mutations, while aspiration is not. Aspirated plosives, alongside fricatives, have All aspirated and glottalized plosives in Haisla are voiceless. All fricatives are voiceless as well.

Morphology

[edit]

Haisla is a VSO (verb-initial) language, with "highly polysynthetic, suffixing, [and] possibly with no (lexical) N–V distinction".[3] Words that correspond to verbs and helping words come first in a sentence. Like the other Wakashan languages, Haisla is made up of multifaceted words made up out of a single root and extended through multiple expansions or reduplication. These can further be altered by lexical or grammatical suffixes, and modal clitics.[4] One example can be seen with the Haisla word for 'condition', ḡʷailas. The word can be modified to mean 'your condition' or 'my condition' as ḡʷailas-us and ḡʷailas-genc respectively.[5]

Emmon Bach, in 'One The Surface Verb q'ay'ai| qela', cited the following points as the structure for building words:

A. Stem = [Ext](Root)(-LexSuf)*(-GramSuf)*

B. Word = Stem(Ending)*

The majority of roots cannot function as independent words; those that can often take on different meanings. One example of this can be seen with the root bekʷ, when combined with the stems -es or -ala, mean either 'Sasquatch' or 'talk', respectively.

Seen in all Wakashan languages, Haisla has a variety of common, clause-level clitics which contain inflection-like semantics. Seen also in Sapir in Swadesh where they are identified as "incremental suffixes", these contain markers of tense, aspect, and modality. These clitics are non-obligatory outside of the perfective vs. imperfective aspect, and do not form paradigms, while having a set order.[6]

Haisla has a wide range of classificatory roots, something shared with its fellow Northern Wakashan languages. These roots are always preceded either by a locative lexical suffix or a transitivizing suffix.[7]

Number and person

[edit]

Haisla has a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd person, as well as their plurals. Haisla does not have a large focus on number, with the word for begʷánem standing for both 'people' and 'person' depending on its context. Haisla also has inclusive and exclusive endings, in reference to if "we" or "us" includes the person being spoken to. Haisla has gender-neutral pronouns, with no distinction between 'him' and 'her'.

All Northern Wakashan languages display elaborate systems of third-person pronominal clitics. These usually include distinct case forms for object, subject, and instrument or possessor. Unlike Kwakw'ala, Haisla and the other Northern Wakashan languages lack prenominal elements. Haisla, however, does make use of the independent demonstrative forms qi, qu, etc., which serve as optional yet frequently occurring first elements in nominal groups.

The subject endings can be seen in the two charts below.

Abbreviation[8] Form Meaning
1sg. -nugʷ(a)/ -n (-en) I
2sg. -su you
2pl. -su + reduplication of verb you plural
1pl. incl. -nis we including you
1pl. excl. -nuxʷ we excluding you
3-1 -ix he/she/it near me
3-1 -ix with reduplication they near me
Abbreviation Form Meaning
3-2 -u he/she/it near you
3-3 -i he/she/it remote
3-gone -ki/-gi he/she/it just gone
3-1 inv. -ixc he/she/it near me invisible
3-2 inv. -uc he/she/it near you invisible
3-3 -ic he/she/it remote invisible

Direct-object endings:

Abb. Form Meaning
1sg. -entl(a) me
2sg. -utl(a) you (singular or plural)
1pl. incl. -entlanis us including you
1pl. excl. -entlanuxʷ us excluding you
3-1 -ʼix / -ʼex̄g him/her/it/them near me
3-2 -ʼu him/her/it/them near you
3-3 -ʼi him/her/it/them remote
3-gone -ʼex̄gi him/her/it/them just gone
3-1 ??-ʼixc*[5] him/her/it/them near me invisible

The '*' denotes how there is a lack of clarity in determining how many of these "invisible" forms are still used.

Syntax

[edit]

As a VSO language, words that correspond to verbs and helping words occur first. For example, the sentence "The chief sees the grizzly", literally translates as "see the chief the grizzly". When expressing negation in Haisla, the helping verb k̕uus-/k̕uu- would occur at the beginning of the sentence. This root is then modified with the proper ending reflecting the subject of the verb, e.g. K̓un duqʷel qi sáakax̄i "I don't see the grizzly".

Possessives

[edit]

When expressing possession in Haisla, endings that are used to indicated to the possessor are also used with objects of some special verbs. The majority of these verbs tend to express emotions or psychological states.

Possessive endings in Haisla sometimes bear a resemblance to those used in English. -nis can be used similarly to the English "my" when placed before a possessed object. Outside of using separated words to express possession, endings can also be used on individual words, e.g. gúxʷgenc "my house here". The set of suffixes in Haisla that reflect possession is quite extensive. Haisla, however, does use the independent demonstrative forms qi, qu, etc., which serve as optional and frequently occurring first elements in nominal groups.

Third Person Possessive Forms: Possessed things near me:

item (inv) inst owner (inv) categories example
-ga -s -ix 1 vis 1 vis k'adayugasix
-ga -c -s -ix 1 inv 1 vis k'adayugacix
-ga -s -ix -c 1 vis 1 inv k'adayugasixc
-ga -c -s -ix -c 1 inv 1 inv k'adayugacixc
-ga -s -u 1 vis 2 vis k'adayugasu
-ga -c -s -u 1 inv 2 vis k'adayugacu
-ga -s -u -c 1 vis 2 inv k'adayugasuc
-ga -c -s -u -c 1 inv 2 inv k'adayugacuc
-ga -s -i 1 vis 3 vis k'adayugasi
-ga -c -s -i 1 inv 3 vis k'adayugaci
-ga -s -i -c 1 vis 3 inv k'adayugasic
-ga -c -s -i -c 1 inv 3 inv k'adayugacic
-ga -s -ki 1 vis gone vis k'adayugasgi
-ga -c -s -ki 1 inv gone vis k'adayugacgi
-ga -s -ki -c 1 vis gone inv k'adayugasgic
-ga -c -s -ki -c 1 inv gone inv k'adayugacgic

Oblique Objects

[edit]

Oblique objects follow up the object in Haisla. Similar to the use of 'of' in English, some verbs require their objects to be marked by either the expression 'his' or the ending '-s' on the previous word. Possession in Haisla is expressed through pronouns, making use of the same endings that are used for oblique objects.

Deixis

[edit]

In Haisla, the location of a conversation directly impacts the use of the language. Depending if something occurred at the site of the conversation or far away, verb endings express where the action took place. There are four possible locations within the language: here (near the speaker), there (near you, the hearer), there (near neither the speaker nor the hearer), and just gone. These concepts help form the "spatial and tempora" aspects of Haisla.[5] The language also distinguishes between things that are seen and known, which are classified as visible. Things that are not visible, instead being imagined or potential, are defined as invisible.

Unique to Haisla is the addition of the optional demonstrative clitics qu and qi, which help make the spatial explicitness of a clause more vivid.

Demonstrative of Independent item Deictic clitic
1 vis. qix -gaẍga
1 inv. [qic(e)x] [-gac(e)ẍga]
2 vis. qu -aẍu
2 inv. [quc] [-acẍu]
3 vis. qi -acẍi, -i
3 inv. qic -acẍi, -ac*
gone qiki -tiẍga
ex:

Duqʷel

see

John-di

John-gone

qic

RINV

w̓ac̓iacx̄i

dog.RINV

Duqʷel John-di qic w̓ac̓iacx̄i

see John-gone RINV dog.RINV

"John saw the dog"

Sociolinguistics

[edit]

Due to the large number of language groups on the Northwest Coast, there was a great deal of contact through trade and cultural exchange. This excess of communication eventually led to the creation of a special "trade language".[9] Called Chinook Jargon, Haisla adopted multiple words from this language such as gʷasáu, or pig. Other words, such as lepláit ~ lilepláit, meaning 'minister, priest', reflect how contact with missionaries affected the language as a whole. The majority of adopted words were for 'new' objects, pre-existing words such as gewedén, or horse, were not overwritten.

Arguments

[edit]

Within the Wakashan language family, "core arguments are identified only by pronominal enclitics attached to the initial predicate. Lexical nominals carry no case marking and constituent order does not distinguish grammatical role".[10]

Status and Revitalization

[edit]

As with the other languages in the North Wakashan family, Haisla is currently endangered. The indigenous languages of British Columbia were heavily influenced by residential schools, with up to 16 residential schools in the province during the 1930s.[11] Speaker population after European arrival was drastically impacted by disease.

Haisla does have programs for those interested in speaking. Kitamaat village provides lessons for those interested in learning the language. Eden Robinson, a Heiltsuk/Haisla author raised in British Columbia, has written and lectured on the subject of language revitalization.[12] Recently she hosted the annual Munro Beattie lecture at Carleton University.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Haisla at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
  2. ^ Lincoln & Rath, Neville J., John C. (1986). Phonology, dictionary and listing of roots and lexical derivatives of the Haisla language of Kitlope and Kitimaat, B. C. Vol.1. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Emmon, Bach; E. Jelinek; A. Kratzer (1995). "A Note on Quantification and Blankets in Haisla". Quantification in Natural Languages. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers: 13–20. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0321-3_2. ISBN 978-94-010-4142-3.
  4. ^ Emmon, Bach (December 2002). "On The Surface Verb q'ay'ai| qela". Linguistics and Philosophy. 25 (5–6): 531–544. doi:10.1023/A:1020826425563. S2CID 170722908.
  5. ^ a b c Bach, Emmon. "Making Sentences". Archived from the original on 2014-02-23.
  6. ^ Fortescue, Michael (July 2006). "Drift and the Grammaticalization Divide between Northern and Southern Wakashan". International Journal of American Linguistics. 72 (3): 295–324. doi:10.1086/509488. S2CID 143670989.
  7. ^ Fortescue, Michael. "The Origins of the Wakashan Classificatory Verbs of Location and Handling". Anthropological Linguistics. 48 (3): 266–287.
  8. ^ Bach, Emmon. "MAKING SENTENCES". Archived from the original on 23 February 2014. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  9. ^ Bach, Emmon. "Lesson 5: K̕eci ziqa!". University of Massachusetts. §5.4 Historical Note: Chinook Jargon. Archived from the original on 14 April 2014. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
  10. ^ Mithun, M. (2007). "Integrating Approaches to Diversity: Argument Structure on the NW Coast". Diversity in Language: Perspectives and Implications.
  11. ^ Miyaoka, Osahito. Vanishing Languages of the Pacific Rim. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 424–428.
  12. ^ "Eden Robinson, My White Accent: The Frontlines of Language Revitalization".

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Lincoln, Neville J. & Rath, John C. 1986. Phonology, dictionary and listing of roots and lexical derivatives of the Haisla language of Kitlope and Kitimaat, B.C. Vol.1. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.
  • Mithun, Marianne. (1999). The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[edit]