Template:Did you know nominations/Asyikin–Brugman Treaty

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 22:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Asyikin–Brugman Treaty

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Asyikin–Brugman Treaty was revoked 11 days after being signed? Source: Proyek Pelita Pengembangan Media Kebudayaan (1977). Sejarah dan adat fiy darul Butuni, Buton (in Indonesian). Proyek Pengembangan Media Kebudayaan, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. p84: "Tetapi rupanya Asyikin kembali sadar , terbukti sebelas hari sesudahnya penanda tanganan kontrak yaitu pada tanggal 19 April 1906 beliau menyatakan tidak berlakunya perjanjian 8 April. Pernyataan ini disampaikan melalui J. Van Hecht yang oleh beliau ini diteruskannya kc Ujung Pandang. Dan pada tanggal 26 April 1906 dengan kapal tumpangan de Ruyter pula. Residen Brugman berada kembali di Buton, dengan pengawal yang lengkap dengan persenjataannya , yang menunjukkan adanya kesiap-siagaan untuk melakukan penyerangan kalau maksudnya tidak tercapai. Dengan disertai ancaman kekerasan Brugman memaksakan untuk mematuhi perjanjian 8 April dan apabila tidak maka Belanda akan menyerang kerajaan Buton ."
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Natives Representative Council
  • Comment: New article, CE will be appreciated

Created by Nyanardsan (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 28 past nominations.

Nyanardsan (talk) 08:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 14:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

• Nyanardsan Thanks for the new article. I've two questions. What is the reliability of tirto.id? Indonesian Wiki https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tirto says it is "a news, article, opinion and infographic site". Minor ce required in the last line: "stayed independent until it voluntarily joined the newly Indonesia Republic." - newly xzy Indonesia - xyz is missing. Is that "formed" or "independent" or something else? Thanks — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Tirto ID is relatively reliable in my opinion as they often do more in-depth analysis and historical infographics. For example their KODAM history series is pretty reliable and neutral (https://tirto.id/kodam-sriwijaya-dari-pergolakan-prri-sampai-peristiwa-talangsari-eT13, https://tirto.id/kodam-pattimura-laskar-orang-maluku-dan-pergulatan-menumpas-rms-eUcr, https://tirto.id/kodam-merdeka-gejolak-prajurit-minahasa-dan-penumpasan-permesta-eUco). Although I have to admit in recent years they seem to be turning into general news model and there are some changes that makes more recent articles needing more scrutiny. Minor ce mentioned done and QPQ done Nyanardsan (talk) 12:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the info — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 14:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)