Jump to content

User talk:47.229.124.210

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm AlphaBetaGamma. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what wasn't civil about it? 47.229.124.210 (talk) 00:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to start an edit war or anything; I just want to know why my comment on Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory was deleted. I also saw stuff an Dimadick's user page and wanted to talk to him and help him. 47.229.124.210 (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
now another person is in this an just banned me :( and i didn't even edit anything. I just had 1 question. I then started asking/having more questions because I'm autistic and have ADHD, and now I'm banned for "disruption" or something. Can someone PLEASE give me an explanation?!??! (on literally any of my questions at this point). 47.229.124.210 (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
why are so many people involved in this and banning me? 47.229.124.210 (talk) 01:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and I can't even tell AlphaBetaGamma to look at my top page, because idk if he/she gets notifications about it :(
he/she told my do leave a message on his/her talk page, but I can't do that, because you ban everyone for know reason. 47.229.124.210 (talk) 01:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
still, nothing?!?? you "replied" (read: banned and deleted) so quickly to everything else. :( 47.229.124.210 (talk) 04:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.229.124.210 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't edit any pages. I just had a question. I then had some more questions for a user about things on his user page (he said he's depressed and I wanted to help him. maybe that was inappropriate. idk the rules.) Then I got banned, I presume for not being a leftist. You might not even see this, but I'll try to reply anyway. Another user?!?? fair enough, but will someone at least respond to my comment on Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory?

Decline reason:

Your political views are not relevant; your disrupting a talk page and harassment of another user are. Yes, you didn't edit any articles- if this were an account you would likely be indef blocked as not here to build an encyclopedia. As it is, you're not an account, so it's only for 31 hours(now less). Once the block is over, you may contribute towards the building of the encyclopedia; if you continue to harass people about the content of their user page or ask irrelevant questions on article talk pages, you may be blocked for longer. 331dot (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.229.124.210 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I already put this, but maybe you didn't see this, so I'm putting it again: You might not even see this, but I'll try to reply anyway. Another user?!?? fair enough, but will someone at least respond to my comment on Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.229.124.210 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've already accepted that you won't unblock me. At this point I'm not asking that. I just want my original question answered, the one someone deleted (presumably without reading) on Talk:Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory. Also, why is it always a different person responding?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Please stop abusing the unblock template. The unblock template is only to be used to contest your block. Yamla (talk) 20:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.