Jump to content

User talk:Jimfbleak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

Your Deletion of Natasha Kravchuk[edit]

Hi Jim, I noticed you just deleted my newly submitted biography for Natasha Kravchuk. Can you provide more insight as to why you automatically deleted it? I spent hours creating that and thought I had researched what was acceptable for content on Wikipedia. Please help me understand why you removed it and I hope you consider restoring it so I can edit and adjust as needed. Thank you so much! Natasha Kravchuk (talk) 19:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page. Autobiography, lacks independent refs, spamlinks, promotional tone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting draft for review[edit]

Hello again. I have submitted Draft:The_Earful_Tower_Podcast for review. After the submission, a bot disabled the categories (e.g. "2016 Podcast Debuts") on the page and another one removed the logo because it's a draft. Question: was I supposed to remove the word Draft from the page name when I submitted it, or was everything done correctly up to this point, including the disabling of the categories and removal of the logo (non-free image I uploaded for use in this article)? I had received a separate note a day before that my non-free image will be deleted if it is not used in an article. It's a bit of catch-22. Thank you! Atolkachev (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atolkachev it's all as it should be so far; we don't want drafts to show up in a category search, and for copyright reasons non-free images can only be used in the final article (even TFA blurbs can't use them) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Atolkachev (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a page that is legit[edit]

Hello, I see that you deleted my page for Guy Deutscher (Physicist). Can you please elaborate why have you done it. This is a very famous scientists in solid state physics and the page contained many references to his many works. You can find that he is also cited in Tel Aviv University website and had a long history of scientific merits. Please reverse your deletion Roy Beck (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page, no proper references and highly promotional tone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean no proper references? These are all peer-reviewed papers vetted by the world's scientific community and links to scientific website in reliable universities. Can you please specify where in the text it is not proper? Where did you find promotional tone? please elaborate so we can fix the webpage according to wiki regulation Roy Beck (talk) 16:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, still no COI response, although I note we can fix the webpage Who is "we"? In what sense is a paper written by him an independent third-party source? If genuine refs comment on his work, fine. If you say "he wrote a paper... here is the paper" it's of no value. Academics write papers, it's part of the job, and doesn't make them notable. Please read my messages before asking Where did you find promotional tone? provided insights into the nature of the pseudogap in these materials... his hallmark papers... represent significant milestones in his research career and have had a lasting impact on the field... This work provided valuable insights into the dynamics of film growth and its impact on the resulting film properties.... not only a brilliant scientist but also a dedicated leader and mentor... Many of his students went on to hold prominent positions in academia and industry in Israel and abroad... leaving behind a beloved family and a legacy of scientific achievement and a profound impact on the field of superconductivity. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 20:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message. I will take your advice and comments to correct the text accordingly if you can just put it back as a draft. To your questions, Prof. Deutscher died a few weeks ago and I, together with few other colleagues, wanted to add more references to his wiki page that was already there for several years (I don't know who put the first page that was live before). In the page, I added the relevant references to the papers he wrote. They are cited correctly according to wiki instructions and appear both in the main text as citation and in the references below with hyperlinks to the papers in the relevant scientific journals. What make distinguished scientists? The answer is that a scientist is measured by how much their work is being cited (thus influenced others), the awards and prizes they received (based on scientific importance of their work measured by his peers), and the legacy of their students they mentored. Given all the above I believe that out of the 300 papers Deutscher wrote more than a few are indeed hallmark papers that changed the way scientists think, in particular about superconductivity. As such they are highly cited by other independent teams all around the world ((check out his google scholar page to appreciate Deutscher's contributions). Unlike other practices, in science it is rather easy to know if one made a big contribution or not (to science). Deutscher is one of them, by all measures. As I wrote before, I will tune down the text once it is back as a draft before submitting (Please remember that the page was already alive wiki page for several years and other cited that page - so I don't understand why did you deleted it all together). Thanks again for your valuable help Roy Beck (talk) 07:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I added more independent references and corrected the tone. Can you please review the Draft? Roy Beck (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletion of my article[edit]

Hi, Jim, can you comment on how my article looks more promotional than other articles on the same topic (open access journals), for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Political_Ecology

This article seems more promotional to me than the one I submitted.

Maybe you can comment on what I can change and return the article to draft? Thank you very much! SunDella (talk) 13:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Thanks for your quick deletion of spam! Maliner (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I really love your administrative work. Long live Jim!

Wolf to Man[edit]

Do you know why "Wolf to Man" was deleted, and not redirected to Nightrage and salted? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jax 0677, I see you've done the redirect, salted as requested now, thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - Thanks, but do you know why the history was deleted? --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jax 0677, done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow me to edit my page[edit]

please allow me to be able to edit my page you rejected Lcgskhokho (talk) 19:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]