User talk:Ravenpuff
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ravenpuff. |
|
2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
User awards
| |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
gaudete et exsultate Thank you for quality articles such as Gaudete et exsultate and List of titular churches, for updating the history of images and hooks used in DYK, for dealing with In the news and Main page errors, for sensible redirects and page moves to better capitalisation, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
|
ITN credit
|
---|
On 6 June 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Elio Sgreccia, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. On 14 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Paolo Sardi, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. On 29 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. On 13 August 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sergio Obeso Rivera, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. On 30 August 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Achille Silvestrini, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. On 6 September 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article José de Jesús Pimiento Rodríguez, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. On 2 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article William Levada, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. On 10 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Serafim Fernandes de Araújo, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 05:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC) |
If you feel like you have a handle on this issue and you're operating within the rough boundaries of consensus, then I won't need to raise the issue at WP:ERRORS. The blurb after your edit repeats George Town 4 times. That starts to get problematic. Five times would definitely require a discussion. It's your call, but please keep an eye on this and be ready to defend your position if people want to talk about it. - Dank (push to talk) 18:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Dank: I argue that my two additions of "George Town" are useful: (1) it's fairly standard to give more context to the caption, which also improves the accessibility of the image; and (2) writing "city centre of George Town" is good for link clarity. As it stands, I don't consider there to be excessive repetition (and having visited the place itself I don't mind mentioning it more often!), but if you do wish to cut down on the use of the name, I would be in favour of doing so elsewhere instead, e.g. "The city serves as the commercial centre". — RAVENPVFF · talk · 18:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ugh, I forgot about the caption ... yeah, that's too much, I need to bring it up at WP:ERRORS. It's not a problem for me at all if they would rather strike one of mine than one of yours. - Dank (push to talk) 19:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Sir Brian Langstaff[edit]
Thank for the edits you are making to the Wikipedia page for Sir Brian Langstaff. I just wanted to mention that during his speech at Central Hall Westminster on 20th May 2024, he mentioned that the Inquiry was not actually closed/finished and that it would remain open somehow (perhaps so he could retain his powers to oversee the recommendations, esp. the delivery of compensation?). I cannot recall how Sir Brian phrased it, but his exact wording would be in the video which started at 2pm. I am just wondering whether mention of this should be included somehow in relation to the Infected Blood Inquiry? What do you think? It would need a reliable source though, but the audiovisual material could be cited as a source if I can determine the specific time index. Thank you again. SpookiePuppy (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SpookiePuppy: If we are to include this fact, I think it should probably go on the article for the inquiry (which is currently just a redirect to the article on the infected-blood scandal), rather than on Langstaff's article, which should stick to a summary of his involvement. The inquiry remaining open doesn't seem to be that noteworthy at the moment, so I would mention it only if e.g. Langstaff announces something substantial.
- If you can find a news source reporting on the inquiry remaning open, that would be the best source to cite, followed by a written transcript of Langstaff's speech (I presume one has been published somewhere). Speaking of the article on the infected-blood scandal, that's in slightly dire need of rearranging and updating, so that fact would probably be worth a mention there eventually. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 01:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)