Category talk:Branches of philosophy

Philosophy Category‑class

	Philosophy portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Regarding: "User:Latintooth/Intelligence Subnet Theory" ... although I'm not a true expert in philosophy, I've read enough to say this recently conceived "Intelligence Subnet Theory" seems hardly worthy of a standalone top level category alongside Methaphysics, Logic, Ethics, etc. At best it should be demoted to a lower level categorization. -RF Oct 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.216.191 (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy[edit]

I'm sorry, but since when is Philosophy a type of Science. More likely the other way around:-)--SteveMtl 06:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Philosophy a type of Science. here is images of the original branches of knowledge. Here is the original http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/ENC_SYSTEME_FIGURE.jpeg and it translated in to English http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/did/graphics/tree.png

There is no "official" or "accepted" main branches of philosophy. There is how ever main areas studied with-in the academia. Now if some one is willing to provide tangible sources through either primary or secondary literature that will prove this statement wrong then step forward. Tekeek (talk) 06:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]