Category talk:Collaborative software

	This category is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This category is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Category‑class

	Linguistics portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This category is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

FileMaker[edit]

I don't think Claris would ever define FileMaker as a piece of collaborative software. It's collaborative nature as a database might be documented in the feature set, but it would not be a major feature or differentiator of the product. An individual could make a FileMaker Pro database and never share it with another person. I believe the criteria to be categorized as collaborative software should be that it always runs on a server (including cloud) and it's value is only realized when a critical number of people are working on it. Zaurus (talk) 02:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]