Category talk:Human communication

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles

Psychology

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Sociology

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles

Whenever I speak to people with great pride about being a Wikipedia Editor, to either a layperson in my local chippy or a media person, or a creative or academic etc, they pretty much all say the same thing.

1 Wikipedia — yeah right! If it’s on Wikipedia it must be true. 2 Anyone can edit Wikipedia!

It really bursts my bubble! I of course defend Wikipedia’s sourced, neutral and pluralistic perspectives way of presenting information.

I just think more people should be made aware of the method as well as the fact it’s free.

Just an idle Sunday thought… The Nookster (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]