This category is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
We have to define this well--does Kissinger count? Strictly academic or do policy makers (M.A. types) count? grenグレン 08:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very good question. I do not think that PhD is a good criterion, but I understand how you meant it. In my opinion, people who have been active in the academia (universities, research institutes) and significantly contributed to the field (i.e. published at least one book or a frequently cited academic article) should be included. I would add Rice to the list, but I am not that sure about Kissinger. Any other opinions here? Tankred 22:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
