Category talk:Librarians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This category is supported by the science and academia work group.
WikiProject iconLibraries Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled[edit]

Should "State Librarians" and their equivalents (e.g., "Librarian of Congress") be considered librarians, even if they do not have a library degree and did not practice as librarians? I note that "Oliver Everett" is included here, despite the apparent absence of actual librarianship, and James Billingsley (Librarian of Congress) is not so included. Perhaps a "State Librarians" or "Official Librarians" or "Titular Librarians" category would be more accurate? LQ 18:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I note that in a profession dominated by women that somehow there are disproportionate numbers of male librarians listed here. (About 30 male librarians and about 10 female librarians. It's not as bad on the "American librarians" category: 22 M to 17 F, which may reflect actual gender disparities in "notability" and not just gender disparities in recognizing or promoting notability. We wiki-editors need to be very careful that we are accurately assessing the contributions of folks despite an institutionalized sexist tendency to minimize and downgrade the accomplishments of women. There may be many reasons for the disproportionate representation of male librarians, but such a disparity is striking in a female-dominated field, and suggests that we haven't done a good job of non-sexist evaluations and inclusions. LQ 18:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]