Category talk:Local council camps of the Boy Scouts of America

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconScouting Category‑class
WikiProject iconCategory:Local council camps of the Boy Scouts of America is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Name change?[edit]

That could get confused with national level ones, like Philmont and Florida Sea Base.Rlevse 14:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, but the name of the category conflicts with the description. --evrik 14:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are a few threads on this right now. They need put into one spot.Rlevse 15:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Agreed, there is a related conversation here. --evrik 15:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More information[edit]

More information on all Scout camps in the U.S. is available in the "Scout Camps U.S.A" book".. Chris 00:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • That is a good resource. Does anyone have a copy? --evrik (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

notability[edit]

What is the difference between a notable and a non-notable local council camp? What makes a camp notable?

I have attempted to create a well-sourced article on a local council camp, but it has been deleted as being a "non-notable" subject. I provided many sources asserting notability - however these have been overlooked and the article deleted based on being assumed to be a recreation of a previously deleted (and unsourced) article on the topic. The camp is just as notable as many of the other camps included in this category (I know because I have been to many of the camps here). Furthermore, the article was well-sourced to show notability (citing more outside sources than most of the articles in here).

I don't want to be the "if you delete one you have to delete everything" guy -- but if some of these camps have articles, why is a camp that is just as notable (if not more so) and the article is well-written, researched and sourced not permitted as well. I have been unable to engage of the objectors in actual discussion on the subject an I feel like no one is listening to me. - Minsi (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I too would like to know. I tagged many of these articles for their lack of asserting notability and/or for lack of citing any sources. I'm not saying these camps are not a notable subjects, but many of these articles (as they are written now) don't show or explain what the notability is. Is there a standard, guideline or policy for gauging the notability of a local council camp? What is the minimal standard needed for a local council camp to be considered notable? Or are all local council camps just inherently notable? ScoutCruft (talk) 02:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]