Category talk:Regionalist parties

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconPolitics: Political parties Category‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis category has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This category is supported by Political parties task force.

I suggest that the term 'regionalist' is itself POV. The members of these groups often consider them to be nations/countries, not regions. --MacRusgail 15:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is the standard terminology in political science (sometimes "ethnoregionalism" is also used, but that term would exclude regionalist movements without a clear ethnic basis, such as the Castilian, Extremaduran, and Madrid regionalists in Spain). "Regionalism" is commonly treated as a species of minority "nationalism"; use of the term doesn't deny that these territories can be considered "nations," but it does distinguish between minority nationalisms based on territorial autonomy within the existing state and those that seek autonomy, of varying degrees, from the existing state. Movements that do seek broader autonomy or independence belong in the "Secessionist organizations" and/or "Independentist parties" categories.--Jsorens 16:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you've touched on another problem here, namely those who are "regionalists" but not nationalists... --MacRusgail 17:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]