Category talk:Skepticism

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Category

This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

Skepticism Category‑class

	This category is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Is there any correlation between Skepticism and Critical thinking? Skepticism is the process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity. Shermer discusses this more thoroughly here: What is a Skeptic? In this video — the fourth in our series of videos that promote science and critical thinking through the use of humor, wit, and satire — we present a fun and informative look at the principles of Skepticism. Xenophrenic (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not an RS. Regardless this is about Philosophical skepticism Apollo The Logician (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Michael Shermer is indeed a reliable source on these matters. Was that humor, perhaps? And no, this is not only about "philosophical" skepticism, which is but one of many sub-parts of this subject: Skepticism. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are confused skepticism in the philsophical context is nothing like scepticism of the new athiest movement. It is only a coincidence that they share the same name. Please educate yourself on a topic before commenting nosense.Apollo The Logician (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"You are confused skepticism"? "commenting nosense"? Even Google Translator can't tell me what you are trying to say. My loss, I guess. Xenophrenic (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you're one of those people huh?Apollo The Logician (talk) 17:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]