Category talk:Species by year of formal description

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

what's the point[edit]

Other than in the pursuit of trivial interest, does listing diverse taxa simply by when they were described serve any real intellectual purpose? J.H.McDonnell (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

naming of category tree[edit]

Assuming this tree does have importance beyond trivia, shouldn't it be 'Species by year of first formal description'? Mayumashu (talk) 03:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The year of description is important for the principle of priority; if a taxonomist decided two species would be better treated as one, the name of the early described species is retained. The year of description is a fundamental piece of taxonomic data. The rules of priority work a little different for plants and animals; the date the species name was published determines priority for animals, while the date of the publication of a combination of genus+species determines the priority date for plants (i.e., a plant described by Linnaeus in 1753, but moved to a different genus in 1950, has a priority date of 1950). The current title of the category covers both plants and animals better than "first formal description" would. Plantdrew (talk) 20:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]