Category talk:Web 2.0

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles

Websites: Computing

	This category is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
	This category is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Internet culture

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Category topics[edit]

Could someone please specify some criteria for what gets included here? I have some ideas, but I want to be sure. There seem to be both websites, software, and program codes listed here. So I would apprecoiate any possible help on this. thanks. --Sm8900 03:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One side of the spectrum would be to eliminate all individual web sites from this category, for the same justification that all web "1.0" sites would not be listed under HTML. Truly notable or novel Web 2.0 sites (i.e. MySpace, Google Maps, etc.) may justify mention in the Web 2.0 article. Otherwise this just becomes a list of links [1]Cander0000 19:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This category is meaningless. "web 2.0" is just another way of saying "we added more useless JavaScript". Pretty stupid. 85.78.102.212 (talk) 10:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contents header[edit]

This entry prints out "funny" with a URL printing out for each letter in the header (Contents) rather than just the capital letters. Can anyone fix this?68.193.241.248 (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]