Category talk:Wikipedia BLP policy

This category is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp articles

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Name[edit]

I think it should better be named Category:Wikipedia biographies of living persons, similarly to Category:Wikipedia neutral point of view, because it's not just about the policy. A category for verifiability could be made too. Cenarium (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a reasonable idea, though I'm unsure what else you wish to include in this category. --Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 04:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mean it's probably better to spell out BLP, and pages in it are not only concerned with the policy itself, for example with enforcement or some specific issues. There are many other pages that could be included, for example Wikipedia:Protecting BLP articles feeler survey, Wikipedia:BLP subject response, Wikipedia:BLP policy advises fix over delete... Maybe we could use a subcategory on essays about BLP, like for category:wikipedia verifiability. Cenarium (talk) 17:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]