This category is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Should not go on articles but on articles' talk pages[edit]
Resolved
– Consensus at WP:CFD is that this belongs on talk pages.
This is an administrative category that is of no value to readers, so it should really be on the talk pages. Alex Middleton 17:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is precisely the conclusion that WP:CFD arrived at; it is considered "non-defining". — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 16:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PS: In the particular case of this category, the article itself should indicate in the lead that the year of death is unknown, and this category will to most readers other than WP:BIOgraphers not be understood to be different from Category:Year of death missing, implying wrongly that the article is incomplete, if applied to the article itself rather than its talk page. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 17:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the qualifier that contemporary individuals may be added to this category if they are widely considered to be dead but we don't have a reliable source as to when they died. To me, "less remote past" means the early modern era (e.g. 1600 to 1900 CE), not the second half of the 20th century. Many editors were adults in the second half of the 20th century and don't see it as a "less" remote past, because it isn't remote at all. --NellieBly (talk) 23:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved