Diversey v. Schmidly
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Diversey v. Schmidly, 738 F. 3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2013) is an American federal copyright case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.[1] The case addresses several important issues in U.S. copyright law, including the three-year statute of limitations, the making available right, the doctrine of fair use, and contributory infringement.
Diversey v. Schmidly is the first U.S. copyright case to explicitly recognize a making available right under § 106(3) of the Copyright Act by having relied on the proposition from Nimmer on Copyright that "[n]o consummated act of actual distribution need be demonstrated... to implicate the copyright owner's distribution right".[2][3]
In "The Tenth Circuit Discovers Copyright’s Lost Ark: Section 106(3) Encompasses a 'Making Available' Right", Professor Peter Menell of the UC Berkeley School of Law wrote:
"[T]he Diversey case squarely holds that making a copyrighted work available to the public without authorization violates Section 106(3) of the Copyright Act. Hence, no proof of actual receipt by the public is required. Although the Diversey case did not involve Internet file-sharing, its invocation of the legislative history underlying the distribution right would apply equally to file-sharing cases. Furthermore, the court’s conception of “lending” a copy also supports a broad understanding of the distribution right."[4]
References[edit]
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 20, 2016. Retrieved October 4, 2016.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Diversey v. Schmidly, 738 F. 3d 1196, 1202 (10th Cir. 2013).
- ^ 2 Melville Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 8.11[B][4][d] at 8-154.10 (2013).
- ^ Menell, Peter S. “The Tenth Circuit Discovers Copyright’s Lost Ark: Section 106(3) Encompasses a ‘Making Available’ Right”. (2014) The Media Institute.
General references
- ""Continuing Wrong" Doctrine Rejected by Tenth Circuit – Diversey v. Schmidly". National Law Review. January 31, 2014. Retrieved October 19, 2016.