Draft:Adaptive capacity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Common Enablers shaping Adaptive Capacity[edit]

An enabler, also known as a promoter or driver, represents a set of factors and conditions which can help to build and develop resilience.[1] In a 2001 IPCC report focusing on impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, six factors were identified as promoters of adaptive capacity. These characteristics contribute to the development and strengthening of adaptive capacity.[2] For instance, a stable and prosperous economy is crucial, as it enables better management of the costs associated with adaptation.[2] Generally, developed and wealthier nations are more prepared to face the impacts of climate change.[3] Access to technology at various levels (local, regional, and national) and in all sectors is essential for staying informed about resource distribution, land use, and extraction practices.[2] Additionally, clearly delineating roles and responsibilities for executing adaptation strategies is important at national, regional, and local levels. Discussion forums and consultations are established to disseminate climate information, ensuring clear communication and collaboration.[2] Social institutions aim to distribute resources equitably, recognizing that power imbalances can hinder adaptive capacity.[2] It's vital to protect existing systems with high adaptive capacity, such as traditional societies, from potential compromises resulting from modern development trajectories.

Common Barriers shaping Adaptive Capacity[edit]

A barrier is an obstacle surmounted through collective efforts, creative management, mindset shifts, and adjustments in resource distribution, land uses, and institutions.[4] Barriers are often confused with limits however, the distinguishing feature between the two is that limits cannot be overcome.[5] Barriers are crucial to consider when assessing the level of adaptive capacity within a group, community, and organization, as they block or hinder adaptation actions.[6] Various types of barriers including historical, political, financial, and natural can be identified. They can be either internal or external and can block or hinder the implementation of an adaptation action and consequently lower adaptive capacity.[6]An external barrier is a factor that falls outside an organization/community/individual's control. For example, a common external barrier is the absence of land available for individuals or enterprises to relocate while faced with a major climatic event such as flooding or wildfires.[7] An internal barrier is typically affected by an organization/community/individual beliefs and perceptions concerning climate change. For example, a common internal barrier is people's reluctance to relocate from flood-prone regions (owing to their livelihood dependence), the costs of land or property, or insufficient awareness regarding the potential flooding risks amid projected climate alterations.[7]

Common organizational barriers include a disconnect between government recommendations/policies and concrete actions made by actors and organizations.[8][9] Scholars point to other significant barriers that may impede adaptation action, like the lack of resources, financial incentives for long-term planning, and a lack of knowledge related to climate change adaptation.[10]Another common barrier is skepticism regarding the severity and urgency of climate impacts. Local knowledge of technical, climate-adapted solutions is instrumental for organizational adaptation, but opportunities to harness this knowledge can be missed due to skeptical beliefs.[10]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Guillaume, Simonet; Alexia, Leseur (2019). "Barriers and drivers to adaptation to climate change—a field study of ten French local authorities". Climatic Change. 155 (4). doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02484-9. ISSN 0165-0009.
  2. ^ a b c d e "IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change". archive.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 2024-04-08.
  3. ^ "Poor and Vulnerable Countries Need Support to Adapt to Climate Change". IMF. 2022-03-23. Retrieved 2024-04-13.
  4. ^ Moser, Susanne C.; Ekstrom, Julia A. (2010). "A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (51): 22026–22031. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10722026M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007887107. PMC 3009757. PMID 21135232. S2CID 7635031.
  5. ^ Piggott-McKellar, A. E.; McNamara, K. E.; Nunn, P. D.; Watson, J. E. M. (2019-06-05). "What are the barriers to successful community-based climate change adaptation? A review of grey literature". Local Environment. 24 (4): 374–390. Bibcode:2019LoEnv..24..374P. doi:10.1080/13549839.2019.1580688.
  6. ^ a b Eisenack, Klaus; Moser, Susanne C.; Hoffmann, Esther; Klein, Richard J. T.; Oberlack, Christoph; Pechan, Anna; Rotter, Maja; Termeer, Catrien J. A. M. (October 2014). "Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation". Nature Climate Change. 4 (10): 867–872. Bibcode:2014NatCC...4..867E. doi:10.1038/nclimate2350. ISSN 1758-6798.
  7. ^ a b Brooks ('first'), Adger ('second'), Nick ('first'), Neil ('second') (2004). "Assessing and Enhancing Adaptive Capacity": 165–181 – via Research Gate. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ Barr, Stephanie L.; Lemieux, Christopher J. (2021-09-21). "Assessing organizational readiness to adapt to climate change in a regional protected areas context: lessons learned from Canada". Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 26 (8): 34. Bibcode:2021MASGC..26...34B. doi:10.1007/s11027-021-09972-3. ISSN 1573-1596.
  9. ^ Ford, James D.; King, Diana (2015-04-01). "A framework for examining adaptation readiness". Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 20 (4): 505–526. Bibcode:2015MASGC..20..505F. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9505-8. ISSN 1573-1596.
  10. ^ a b Greenwood, Lisa L.; Lin, Vicki; Abraham, Yewande S.; Schneider, Jennifer L. (January 2023). "Partnering for Climate Resilience: Exploring the Maturity of Private-Sector Efforts in the Great Lakes Region". Sustainability. 15 (19): 14105. doi:10.3390/su151914105. ISSN 2071-1050.