Draft:Biocentrism Debunked: A Critical Examination of a Controversial Theory
| Submission declined on 9 January 2024 by Praseodymium-141 (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Biocentrism Debunked: A Critical Examination of a Controversial Theory[edit]
Biocentrism Debunked is a philosophical hypothesis that battles consciousness as the fundamental reality of the universe and that the actual world is a consequence of consciousness. Robert Lanza advocated the term in his 2007 book Biocentrism: How Life and Awareness Are the Keys to Grasping the Real Essence of the Universe.
Heading text[edit]
Biocentrism: Conceptual Framework and Origin
Lanza argues that our ongoing information on physical science is insufficient to make sense of the presence of awareness. He argues that awareness is the fundamental reality and that the actual world is a psychological construct. Criticism and Challenges to Biocentrism
Biocentrism has been criticized by numerous scientists and philosophers as a contentious idea. One of the basic protests of biocentrism is that it can't be falsified.
- • This implies that logical techniques can't be utilized to test or invalidate biocentrism.
- • How we might interpret physical science goes against it. The biocentric argument that awareness is the fundamental fact of the universe goes against what we learn in physics, for instance, which teaches us that the cosmos existed before life.
- • It is unnecessarily equivocal. Critics guarantee that the possibility of consciousness is inadequately characterized and that biocentrism neglects to make sense of how mindfulness creates the actual world.
Despite these protests, biocentrism remains a well-known philosophical and logical issue of discussion. Biocentrism is a possible new way of looking at the universe, according to some scientists and philosophers, and it will be supported by empirical evidence in the future. Be that as it may, biocentrism isn't currently acknowledged as an experimentally trustworthy perspective.
Specific Instances of Biocentrism Being Debunked[edit]
The following are a couple of instances of how biocentrism debunked: In 2012, a group of scientific researchers claimed in the journal Actual Survey Letters that biocentrism is contradictory to quantum material physics science. That's what the researchers showed: assuming the brain produced the actual physical universe, making sense of the way quantum particles behave would be troublesome. David Chalmers, a philosopher, composed an article in the journal Consciousness and Discernment in 2015 contending that biocentrism is established on a misconception of the connection between awareness and the physical world. Chalmers argued that consciousness is a side effect of the physical world, as opposed to the reverse.
Final Verdict – Biocentrism Debunked[edit]
Many scientific researchers and philosophers have reprimanded biocentrism as a hostile notion. Although there is no scientific evidence to support the biocentric debunked idea that the mind is the underlying reality of the cosmos, it is still a popular subject of debate.