Draft:Bournemouth body parts murder

Bournemouth body parts murder

Map of locations and times where Shotton's remains were discovered
Date	c. 18 August 2023 (killing) c. 19 August - 1 September (dismemberment and disposal of body parts)
Location	Boscombe, Bournemouth, Dorset
Accused	Benjamin Atkins Debbie Ann Pereira
Trial	Winchester Crown Court

The Bournemouth body parts murder was a murder of 49-year-old local man, Simon Shotton, who was suspected to have been killed by Debbie Pereira and Benjamin Atkins on or around 18 August 2023.

Shotton had been living at the couple's address on an arrangement that he supplied them with crack cocaine and heroin. It was believed that the murder had been carried out due to Atkins not being happy with the amount of drugs that Shotton had or was providing to the couple in exchange for a place to stay.

Shotton's body was dismembered in the couples flat using a hacksaw stolen from a local shop. Body parts were put into bin bags, a suitcase or deposited without any covering in various places across Boscombe and discovered by a member of the public and police on 26 August, before further discoveries were made by police on 2 September, 6 September, 2023 and 28 February, 2024.

Background

Simon Shotton

Shotton was a 49-year-old man, who at the time of his death, had been living in the Boscombe suburb of Bournemouth. Prior to moving to Bournemouth, Shotton lived in Ipswich, Suffolk.It was reported that Shotton used the name 'Rio'.

In April 2020, Suffolk Constabulary attended his address in Woodbridge Road, Ipswich, locating 188 wraps of heroin and crack cocaine. Sutton explained to police that his address had been taken over by county lines dealers and in return for selling drugs with a youth they placed in the house, was given two wraps of drugs each night. Shotton was found guilty of possessing crack cocaine and heroin with intent to supply, as well as possession of heroin and crack cocaine. He was given a two-year prison sentenced that was suspended for two years.

On 1 February, 2022, at Ipswich Crown Court, Shotton was sentenced to 3-years-and-1-month imprisonment for possession with intent to supply Class A drugs, namely heroin and crack cocaine, as well as possessing a bladed article in a public place, namely a knife.

In September 2022, Shotton was released on license, however, he had received threats about returning to Ipswich; Shotton allegedly had drug debts of £10,000. Not wanting to return to Ipswich, he decided to move to Bournemouth.

Moving to Bournemouth, Shotton was under the supervision of the Probation Service.He was subject to monthly probation meetings, arranged via text messages to a mobile phone of which the probation service provided Shotton with a SIM card for.

Derelict Mon Bijou Hotel, Manor Road, with police tape around it (the police tape around the building is for an unrelated incident)

Having moved to Bournemouth, Shotton stayed at the derelict remains of the Mon Bijou Hotel on Manor Road,which had been boarded up for approximately 10 years. According to a probation officer, the building was in the process of being renovated and was 'very run down'. Shotton lived in a small room, with make shift curtains and a bed.Shotton didn't pay rent to live at the address and told his probation officer that there was an informal agreement of him being employed to stay at the address to deter squatters, of which there had been a problem throughout the time the property was empty. However, it had been suggested that Shotton was more of a squatter himself, who the owners tolerated being there.

Shotton's probation officer stated that she was worried about Shotton's use of heroin and crack cocaine, describing how Shotton was 'fairly open' about using cannabis. Unbeknown to the probation officer, there was evidence of crack cocaine having been smoked at the address that Shotton was staying at, as well as him sending texts advertising the sale of crack cocaine and heroin. Shotton was in fact a dealer for a main crack and heroin dealer in London called 'Roco'.

Approximately a month before August 2023 (either June or July), Shotton was asked to move on from the property, having previously been asked to leave several times and having had a disagreement with the owner of the building.

At approximately the end of July, a fellow drug user had met with Shotton for the last time, describing how he looked 'tired'. Asking Shotton if he was alright, Shotton told him that the 'dealers' he was working for were 'working him too hard'.

Benjamin Atkins and Debbie Pereira

Atkins

Atkins had attended The Cherwell School in Oxford, Oxfordshire.According to Pereira, Atkins was a paranoid schizophrenic and also had depression and had attempted to get help through the substance and mental health charity, We Are With You.

Whilst not having received an immediate prison sentence, Atkins had 16 convictions from offending dating back to 1990, which included:

Month	Year	Offence
June	1990	Attempted robbery Carrying a firearm with intent
January	1992	Driving whilst disqualified Driving without insurance Other traffic offences
June		Criminal damage
November		Non-dwelling burglary
April	1995	Common assault
August	1997	Posessing a firearm and ammunition without a certificate
February	1998	Posession of a controlled substance (cannabis)
May	1999	Dwelling burglary
July	2014	Non-dwelling burglary
October	2015	Theft
December
January	2016	Posession of a controlled substance (heroin)
September	2021	Drink driving
October	2021	Driving whilst disqualified Failure to provide a specimen for analysis Driving without insurance

Pereira

Pereira was born in Johannesburg, South Africa, before being adopted into a family. She described her adopted father as an 'abusive alcoholic'. She stated that he would get his friends to go to her bedroom, noting how she was sexually and physically abused.

By the age of 12, Pereira had started drinking alcohol and snuck out her house to local clubs. On one occasion, she attended a nightclub and was kidnapped and falsely imprisoned for three days, being raped by two men she had met in the club. She stated that her mother had attended a hospital to identify a body that was believed to be hers.

At the age of 14, Pereira moved to the United Kingdom, living in Poole.

At the age of 29, Pereira got with a man who introduced her to heroin. From here, she started to commit crime to fund her drug habit. Pereira had what she described as a 'horrifically abusive' long relationship with a previous partner (it is unknown whether this is the same man who introduced her to heroin).

At some stage, Pereira had two children. One of her twin's she had was stillborn and at the time of her arrest, she had been getting over an anniversary of this.

Pereira was a long term drug user, described as wearing the ‘mental scares of her life journey’.Having left a drug rehabilitation programme in 2018, Pereira was sober for 18 months, allowing her to have her children returned to her. However, getting into an abusive relationship, Pereira relapsed, before she moved into a dry house.

On leaving the dry house, Pereira moved into 18B Aylesbury Road in September 2021, returning to sobriety. At this time, she was single and also got to see her children.A neighbour described her as seeming "...quite friendly" and to be in a "really good frame of mind" in the first few months after meeting her in approximately 2021/2022.Pereira started drinking when Atkins first moved into her address, but initially was not taking drugs. However, a few months after Atkins moving in, whilst he relapsed on alcohol first, she relapsed on drugs first.

Having relapsed, Pereira stated that she was smoking heroin on a pipe, having previously used this intravenously. She added that she got her drugs from the "many dealers in Boscombe".

At the time of her arrest on suspicion of Shotton's murder, Pereira was a methadone user, having had OCD and agoraphobia, causing her not to go out and get panic attacks. She was seeking help with doctors and We Are With You regarding her agoraphobia.

Pereira had convictions that dated back to 2014, including:

Month	Year	Offence
April	2014	Failing to surrender to custody Handling stolen goods Making false representations (fraud) Theft by shoplifting
June		Failing to surrender to custody
July
November		Theft by shoplifting
January	2015	Theft by shoplifting Commission of a further offence during the operational period of a suspended sentence
September		Theft by shoplfiting
November
January	2016	Burglary and theft of non dwelling
May		Theft by shoplifting Failing to comply with the requirements of a community order

Relationship

Pereira and Atkins met during a drug rehabilitation programme in July 2018 but weren't romantically involved until approximately April/May 2022. This followed Atkins commenting on some of Pereira's posts on Facebook, with the pair arranging to see one another. Having started a relationship, Atkins moved into Pereira's address a few months after.

At the time of Shotton’s death, and Atkins and Pereira had been in a relationship for 18 months. In August 2023, the couple were living together at Pereira's address of18B Aylesbury Road in Boscombe, where they had been for over a year. A neighbour described them as: "...a very happy couple". Another neighbour, who had known Pereira since she first moved into the address, stated that after Atkins appeared in Pereira's life, he noticed her appearance being 'slightly gaunt' and 'got thinner and appeared more pale'. It was noticed that she was 'less outwardly friendly'. It was also noticed that visits from Pereira's family to her address 'tailed off'. Atkins told the neighbour that the changes in Pereira's appearance were due to an eating disorder, with the neighbour starting to think that she was on drugs after Atkins had moved in. Another person visiting Aylesbury Road stated that he noticed "...a lot of people who I didn't recognise; messy clothes, scruffy appearances, were coming in and out."

The couple were using drugs together, having both relapsed. In order to fund their habit, Atkins would shoplift or the couple would find items that people had left outside their addresses, which included electrical items that the couple took to Cash Creators to exchange for money.

Pereira appeared to have mixed reviews on her relationship with Atkins.

After her arrest, Pereira described her relationship to police with Atkins as having a good connection, where they communicated and didn't argue or fight and later told police: "I really fucking love him". She stated that when they both met, Atkins wasn't over his ex-partner and having to hear a lot about Atkins' ex-partner, she didn't cope well, so started using drugs again. Whilst the couple had ongoing financial issues, Pereira stated that it was 'minor' and retorted: "We've got love". A person visiting Aylesbury Road alleged that he believed the couple had attempted to sell him what he thought was stolen produce.

However, Pereira later stated in court that her relationship with Atkins was 'draining', adding that the man she had met whilst in rehab wasn't the same person when they met again. Pereira put this down to the alcohol, which she stated turned Atkins into "something different". Despite this, she thought that she was in love with him.

Pereira stated that the reason for not ending the relationship with Atkins was because she felt "unworthy of love" and "unworthy of him".

Whilst Pereira stated that Atkins was never physically abusive to her, she stated that he used to "snarl his teeth" at her, knowing it would trigger her, as it was something her abusive step father used to do.

Prior to Shotton's death

Pereira had met Shotton, as he was a drug dealer that the couple used to buy drugs from. Pereira stated that she had visited Shotton whilst he was staying at the derelict hotel in order to "score drugs off him".

Shotton told Pereira that as the building owner was worried he was dealing drugs from the address, he had been told he couldn't stay there anymore. This led Shotton having a discussion between Atkins and Pereira about staying at 18B Aylesbury Road, with an agreement being made that he could stay at the address in return for "£20 of crack [cocaine] and £20 of heroin everyday".

Having made an arrangement, Shotton provided the address when an offer was made to drop off his belongings by someone working on behalf of the owner of the derelict B&B.

Shotton explained to a friend that he was 'making sure they are both well each day, and it costs £30', which was in regards to providing heroin.

Prior to his death, Shotton had been staying at Pereira's address for approximately two weeks. However, the relationship between Shotton and Atkins appeared to change, with Atkins finding it disrespectful that Shotton would not leave the couple drugs before he left the address, before returning with drugs, using them in front of the couple and not sharing them. It was reported there were arguments between Atkins and Shotton, as well as one argument between Pereira and Shotton.

Killing

18B Aylesbury Road (outlined), where it is believed Shotton was killed

Prior to Shotton's death

Whilst the exact time and location of Shotton’s death is not known, from the available evidence, it was believed to be the morning of 18 August at 18B Aylesbury Road.

The estimations around the time of Shotton's death are from CCTV and mobile phone evidence, with the suspected location being established from traces of blood at Atkins and Pereira's address.

During the early hours of 18 August, Shotton had sent texts to a friend, telling her that it was 'stressful' where he was living and that he felt uncomfortable where he was. She didn't know where Shotton was staying, but thought that he appeared frightened and told him that if he felt uncomfortable to pretend he was going to the shop and to leave his belongings at the address.

Shotton remarked that Atkins was an "ungrateful, blackmailing, vindictive, two faced wanker", adding "I'm so close to wanting to smash his face in". Shotton explained to his friend how Atkins had sent him blackmail messages, stating that: "I give them [Atkins and Pereira] two of each [heroin and crack cocaine] every day and the only one that says thank you for it is her [Pereira]. That's how much of a cunt he [Atkins] is to her, and everyone else." Shotton told her that Atkins wasn't happy with what Shotton gave him in return for accomodation.

Shotton had asked his friend if he could stay at her address and she offered him to stay there from the morning of 18 August to 21 August, but at approximately 02:22 BST, Shotton told her that he was 'definitely staying' at the address where he was. These messages were later deleted (it is unknown whether this was by Shotton or others).

Between approximately 04:00 BST and 05:00 BST, Atkins and Pereira left Aylesbury Road, in order to get drugs. Pereira noted how Atkins had taken £30 out of Shotton's wallet when he wasn't looking, whilst he was shaving in the bathroom. At 06:50 BST on 18 August, Atkins was seen on CCTV pushing a wheelbarrow (which he had taken from the corner of a driveway of a house they were walking past), with Pereira cycling alongside him, along Christchurch Road, through Boscombe, towards their home address. At approximately 06:57 BST, CCTV footage shows Atkins using a phone passed to him by Pereira, receiving a call from Shotton. Pereira later stated that Shotton had said "fucking put him on" and having handed the phone to Atkins, it sounded like he was shouting down the phone at him. Pereira described how Atkins appeared calm and was laughing at Shotton. Atkins told Shotton that they would "sort it out when we get home". At approximately 06:59 BST, Shotton text Atkins saying: "Ben, I'm telling you now, you must have my money when you get back home or w [sic]".

Further communications recovered from Shotton’s mobile revealed that he had been texting another friend, a male, to the effect that he needed to move out the address. The friend had previously dealt drugs to Pereira, who she had met around the same time as she had met Shotton.The friend had arranged with Shotton to collect him from Aylesbury Road on the morning of 18 August, at about 09:00 BST. Shotton's friend text him at approximately 07:30 BST, asking whether he was awake and that he should be at his address within the hour, driving from Southampton, Hampshire. Shotton replied stating: "The quicker the better bro, before I end up going back to jail". Shotton's friend asked what he meant (Shotton hadn't told his friend that he'd previously been in prison) and whether everything was ok, to which Shotton replied, asking him to get to the address as quick as possible and that he needed help putting his stuff into his friends car, stating he would tell his friend about what was going on when he arrived at his address.

At 07:50 BST, Shotton text his friend: "I have another little cunt who cannot keep his hands to himself", adding that Atkins had stolen £30 in wages off him. At 08:03 BST, Shotton texted his friend again, stating: "And they stole my packet of fags, fucking scumbags". Shotton told his friend that he had cut the power cable on the couples television.At 08:06 BST, the friend text Shotton that he was on the way to the address, with Shotton having last replied a minute before, indicating that he was still alive at this time.

Shotton's death

What is known about the killing in the address is only from the accounts at court, which were as follows:

Pereira's account

Having returned to the address, Pereira entered first, seeing Shotton about to inject heroin and crack cocaine. She stated that on walking into the address, Shotton stopped what he was doing, lifting the syringe up, shouting at Atkins "really loud", shouting: "I want my fucking money". Pereira shouted back at Shotton to move the syringe, adding that whilst she didn't feel like he was going to stab her with it, she thought it was "just a threat". Attempting to calm the situation down, Pereira told Shotton, who was described as being "very, very upset", that things were going to be fine and would be sorted, telling him not to worry.

Whilst talking to Shotton, Pereira was told by Atkins to go into their bedroom, where Atkins snarled his teeth at her, being very angry, to which Pereira thought was due to him feeling she had undermined him and been disloyal. She thought that this was due to the way she had been telling Shotton not to worry, which was not supportive of Atkins.

Atkins told Pereira to go into the utility room and tell Shotton that as soon as Cash Creators opened, they were going to sell items to attempt to give him his money back. Whilst doing this, Pereira stated that Shotton was still "really upset". Shotton told her that he didn't like Atkins and didn't know why Pereira was with him, with Pereira attempting to make Shotton be quiet.

Meanwhile, Atkins was shouting at her, so Pereira returned to the bedroom to see him, upset that he had been shouting at her and thinking that he was delusional, later noting that she thought she had given her everything to their relationship, but nothing was ever good enough for Atkins, who allegedly gaslighted her.

Having left the bedroom, the couple heard the door of the utility room shut and both thought that Shotton had left the address. Walking to the utility room to see if he was still there, they saw Shotton was still there, still "very angry" and telling them that he wasn't going to leave until he got his money.

Moving around the side of Pereira, Atkins went towards Shotton, where the pair got hold of each other and began grappling. Panicking, Pereira went into the bedroom, where she could hear the pair shouting at each other and some banging. Hearing this, she ran back to where the pair were, where she noticed the door of the utility room, which had been open when she left the room, was now closed.

Going towards the room, she saw Atkins was on the floor, with Shotton on top of him. She saw Shotton hunched over Atkins and had hold of him. Atkins shouted at Pereira to go into the bedroom, which she did. For approximately five minutes, here, she continued to hear shouting and banging, before it went quiet, just before Atkins walked through the door of the bedroom.

Covered in blood over his face and top half, Atkins told Pereira: "It's over, he's dead". Atkins told Pereira that Shotton's last words were 'help me' and that Atkins had told her: "When he [Shotton] died, he fucking pissed himself". Pereira later stated that during this moment, she felt "paralysed" and "scared", as she tried to "comprehend what happened".

Aftermath

The Crescent, Boscombe. The entrance to Aylesbury Road is between the two white-fronted buildings on the left of the photograph

18 August

Immedietly after Shotton's death, Atkins told Pereira that he was going to "deal with this" and that she didn't have to worry about anything, with Atkins telling her: "I know what I'm doing". He told Pereira: "No one's going to look for him, no one's going to be bothered, no one's going to care". Pereira later stated that she was "shocked", not wanting Shotton hurt or killed.

Atkins had take Shotton's crack pipe from his pocket, which was loaded with crack cocaine, with the couple then smoking the drugs. The couple were in the bedroom for approximately an hour or more, however, Pereira later accepted that her timings could be wrong due to her having been smoking drugs.

Pereira stated that the couple smoked and Atkins had a shower, reiterating various things to her, attempting to calm her down. She later described Atkins as: "...Just really, really calm." At some point, she noticed injuries on Atkins' hand, seeing him bandaging these up. Atkins placed the clothes he was wearing in a bag in the bedroom.

At 08:24 BST, the male friend text Shotton that he on the road outside the address. However, not knowing the exact number of the property, the man couldn’t knock. He attempted to call Shotton at approximately 08:29 BST, however, received no answer from both the phone call and texts. The friend sent a final text at approximately 08:31 BST, telling Shotton that he would wait five minutes before then leaving. Having sent that message, Shotton's friend waited for approximately half an hour, before he left.

An hour after Shotton's last message, Atkins was seen on CCTV to walk across Boscombe Crescent from Aylesbury Road, appearing to be carrying a bin bag or sack, with something rectangular within it.

Shortly before midday, the couple left the address - Pereira stated that she had seen Shotton's body through a window, covered in blankets and clothing in the utility room on collecting her jacket to leave the address, describing this as "horrible". At 11:55 BST, CCTV showed Atkins and Pereira exiting Randolph Road, heading towards Cash Creators, appearing to be wearing different clothing from the previous CCTV footage. According to Pereira, Atkins had wanted to sell the glue gun and soldering iron and she had accompanied him, despite not wanting to go out, as she had an account at the shop.

Boscombe High Street, where Atkins and Pereira went to a shop to sell Shotton's mobile phone and to another shop where one of them stole a hacksaw

Arriving at the shop, they attempted to sell two DVD players, a soldering kit and a glue gun. Whilst the soldering kit and glue gun were accepted, the shop worker didn't accept the DVD players, as they weren't provided with a remote. Atkins was seen wearing a large wrist support on his right hand, covering most of his hand and half way up his forearm. On his left wrist, there appeared to be clear tape holding a small dark patch (appearing to be a homemade plaster), with plasters on fingers on his left hand. Pereira was heard to say to him words to the effect of ‘you’ve hurt your hand, innit’.

Shotton's female friend text him at 12:10 BST but never received a reply.

Having left Cash Creators at approximately 13:00 BST, Atkins and Pereira were captured on various CCTV cameras to walk back along Christchurch Road towards Pokesdown, away from their address. At 13:30 BST, they were seen to head into Aylesbury Road and back towards their address.

Later that day, at approximately 16:00 BST, Atkins and Pereira are seen on CCTV, with Pereira in another different outfit, whilst Atkins wore the same clothing he was seen in whilst in Cash Creators. Walking together from Aylesbury Road towards the shops, however, they are seen to separate. Atkins continues into the shopping area in Boscombe, whilst Pereira appeared to turn back, alone, and return in the direction of their address. The couple arrived back together at approximately 16:41 BST.

An IPhone SE, similar to the type Shotton had

Later that day, the couple, both on bikes, re-attended Cash Creators, where Pereira sold Shotton’s rose gold coloured iPhone SE for £15 at 17:15 BST. Whilst in the store, a member of staff used Shotton's phone to call the shop, to see if it worked.

At some point, a couple saw Atkins and Pereira at Cash Creators. They noted that Atkins had cuts on his hand, which he told the male of the couple was due to 'a fight'.

Over the following days, the friend who had arranged to meet Shotton on 18 August tried to call again, but could not get through to Shotton.The friend who had text Shotton during the early hours of the same day sent another text but never received a reply. It was later found that this text message wasn't deleted off of Shotton's phone.

19 August

At some time on the following day, Pereira went into the utility room for the first time, finding blood "everywhere, all over the walls, on the floor." Atkins asked her to help clean this up and whilst she started to, she stopped when she 'couldn't do it anymore.'

Atkins and Pereira were seen on CCTV at 11:38 BST on Walpole Road (near to their home address). CCTV showed them walking through Christchurch Road, where, at approximately 12:37 BST, they went into the Sovereign Centre in Boscombe, before going into Wilko. Whilst in the shop, the couple separate, and one of them stole a hacksaw, before meeting up again and leaving the shop, going further into the shopping centre. CCTV appeared to show Atkins concealing the stolen saw, with something underneath his armpit, appearing to have a red handle or something that is red.

Later, at 12:47 BST, the couple were seen on CCTV to walk towards their home address and whilst on Christchurch Road, CCTV shows what appears to be a saw dangling off the handle of the bicycle that Atkins is pushing.

Investigation

26 August

Discovery of legs

The clifftop at Boscombe, close to the Manor Steps zig-zag where some of Shotton's remains were discovered

On 26 August, 2023, at approximately 12:45 BST, a member of the public who was

working on Boscombe seafront, walked up the Manor steps zig-zag, leading from the seafront to Boscombe Cliff Road. As she did so, there was an influx of heavy rain, causing her to stop under some overhanging branches to shelter. Having waited there for around five minutes, an item landed beside her with a ‘very loud thump as it hit the floor’. Initially, she thought someone had thrown something at her and the woman ran away.

However, not being able to see anyone in the surrounding area, she wondered whether the item had been dislodged by the rain and returned to it. On returning to the item, she found a large package that smelt badly, as if something inside was rotting. She initially thought that it was a dead animal, before noticing it looked padded and had a phone attached to it, with grey masking tape around it.

She decided not to look inside it, making her way back to her nearby office. Initially, she thought not to call police at that time, not being sure as to what the time was and not wanting to waste their time. Arriving there, she collected her raincoat, before heading back to the beach to continue working.

Around 15 minutes later, the woman walked back down the zig-zag, and saw the package again, thinking that it had been moved and that the grey masking tape that was around it looked loose. Approaching the package, the woman realised the shape appeared to be that of a human foot, with some of it being exposed. Still ‘not 100% sure of what it was’ she contacted the police via 101 at approximately 13:10 BST.

Police attended the scene very quickly and as an officer walked towards the package, he smelt a 'pungent smell' that he associated with a decomposing body.Another officer, described the item wrapped in black plastic, ‘like that of a bin liner’, secured with ‘two strips of grey tape’. The officer noticed ‘something white’ poking out of the plastic, smelling what he described as a ‘foul smell’.

Using a pen knife to slightly open a part of the package, an officer exposed the foot and leg further, confirming what it was, having seen what he thought was a 'toe with a nail on it'.The leg had been cut at the mid thigh and another officer later remarked how it appeared to them that it was a human foot, 'discoloured with a green tinge'.

The officer, wanting to identify where the package had fallen from and as to whether there were any suspects present, climber over a nearby fence, going towards undergrowth, where they located a similar package.This package contained another leg, also cut at the mid thigh. Police believed that the torrential rain had dislodged the packages from where they were hidden.

31 August

DNA profile attributes legs to Shotton

On 31 August, a complete DNA profile, taken from 12g samples of muscle tissue,revealed that the legs belonged to Shotton.The forensic scientist later stated that it was 'at least 1 billion times more likely' that the legs were Shotton's than of someone else.

Manor Road, Boscombe, in the direction of where Shotton was living

Police conducted enquiries into locating Shotton’s last known address and through the probation service, were given a telephone SIM card number that Shotton had given them, as well as his last notified address in Manor Road, Boscombe.

Arriving at the address, police found it to be a derelict B&B with no-one in. A search was carried out, before a man who had responsibility for the building arrived. He explained that as the site needed to be cleared, Shotton had been asked to move on. The man showed text messages he had exchanged with Shotton on 10 August about getting his possessions sent to 18 Aylesbury Road in Boscombe.

Boscombe High Street, the location of the Cash Creators store (pictured, as the yellow-fronted shop, lower right)

Meanwhile, police continued their enquiries in relation to Shotton’s phone number. The phone data revealed that the last call made was at 17:25 BST on 18 August to a landline of 01202 729902. Police called the landline and an employee at Cash Creators, picked up. Attending the store, police discovered Shotton’s iPhone SE, which had been brought into the shop. The shop informed police that a woman, Pereira, a regular customer who visited to sell 'random' items, had brought the iPhone into the shop in exchange for cash, providing CCTV that showed Pereira, along with Atkins, attending the store.

1 September

On the morning of 1 September, Atkins and Pereira left their flat, speaking to a neighbour who was outside of number 20. Pereira said hello to the neighbour, whilst Atkins told him that he had found a dead fox with a pigeon in its mouth and had subsequently cremated it. The neighbour immediately found this strange, given his own experience of living in the countryside and how 'unbelievable' it was that a fox would die with a pigeon in its mouth.

Arrest of Atkins and Pereira

At some time after 21:00 BST on 1 September, having attended 18B Aylesbury Road where the pair lived, police arrested Pereira on suspicion of murder. Beginning to cry, Pereira repeated: "I haven't done anything wrong." Asked whether there was anyone else at the address, she told police there wasn’t, stating that she had a boyfriend who occasionally visited. Evidence bags were placed over her hands in order to prevent contamination, before Pereira was transported to Bournemouth police station.

Police searched the outside of the address and an officer, using a torch, saw a person's hiding behind a wheelbarrow, having seen their head to the side of it. The person was crouched down in a gap between the wheelbarrow and a ladder. The person stood up and the officer recognised him as Atkins. At 21:12 BST, the officer arrested Atkins on suspicion of murder. Police seized a Sol mobile phone from Atkins on arrest that was later found to belong to Shotton (potentially being used for drug dealing).

Police took a statement from Shotton's female friend, who stated that the 'general gist of messages' from Shotton to her, was that he was staying with a male, who wasn't nice to him, as well as a female, who was nice to him.

2 September

Discovery of arms

On 2 September, police conducted a forensic examination in the garden of the address. While conducting a search, a Crime Scene Investigator (CSI) noted a smell of decomposition that he described was 'detectable at intervals, despite wearing a mask'. This smell was found to be from items near to an extension, were leaning against the wall were items including a mountain bike, wheelbarrow and a ladder, which an item of clothing had been placed on.

Within that area, two black bin bags were located underneath the wheelbarrow where Atkins had been located hiding. Creating a hole in the bag, CSIs exposed fingers and discovered that each bag bag contained a severed arms, which had been cut in the middle of the upper area of them.

18B Aylesbury Road and garden (highlighted in red - photo taken from the air in 1992), where Shotton's arms were discovered and a forensic examination uncovered it was apparent he had been dismembered in the utility room of the address

Forensic examination of Atkins and Pereira's address

The forensic examination also located Shotton's blood that had collected in a pool, having seeped over the edge of the linoleum in the address’ utility room, as well as the concrete underneath. It appeared that some of the blood was diluted with water, consistent with a large quantity of blood being present and water having been used to clear it up. According to a scientific expert who conducted blood pattern analysis at the address, cleaning chemicals can break down biological material, cells and completely remove DNA. Other airborne droplets of blood were located on the washing machine as well as some within the fate on the top of a radiator.

In the doorway between the living and utility room, two separate blood stains were located on the carpet. Whilst a forensic scientist couldn't establish how they got there, a DNA profile matched that of Shotton's to a 'very high probability'.

There was no blood staining in the kitchen or bathroom of the address. Blood was located within the grouting behind the sink, the carpet in the lounge and on the height adjustment leave of a stool located in the utility room. Within this room, some blood had been wiped from the wall. Blood was also located on the wheelbarrow that Atkins was found hiding behind. There was also staining on a garden fence, but a forensic scientist thought that this could have been deposited by flies, due to it being 'occasional in nature' and not forming a 'particular pattern'.

There was evidence of decoration having occurred on a light cream painted wall, with a slightly darker magnolia paint that had been applied in a ‘sporadic and haphazard fashion’, as well as the words ‘I love you’ having been painted. Blood staining was identified that had been partially obscured by paint, suggesting that paint was used to cover blood up, with the blood having been present before the paint.

The garden showed no signs that Shotton’s body was dismembered there, including any significant blood loss. There was a 'small, ill defined blood stain' located within the opening of the tent in the garden, but a DNA sample wasn't able to be successfully obtained.

Blood samples were taken from the address which matched Shotton's DNA profile. This was from blood on the wall (under the paint), within grouting behind the sink. within the grating of the top of a radiator and within a pair of shoes. Shotton's DNA was also discovered on blood on a sponge floor cleaner. A forensic expert also located a weak DNA result on a screwdriver that had blood staining on it, but they were unable to say whether Shotton's DNA had originated from blood on this item, with the item providing a mixed DNA result.

Swabs taken from within a wheelbarrow in the garden indicated Shotton's DNA, as well as someone else, but not that of Atkins or Pereira.

Blood samples matching Atkins' DNA profile were located on staining on a door leading from the utility room into the garden, as well as within the inside of a pair of shoes, which was on top of a DNA profile belonging to Shotton. A mixed profile that could possibly be from Atkins on the handle of a mop.

A forensic scientist found that the forensic evidence at the address supported that Shotton was dismembered in the utility room of the address, but they weren't able to conclude whether any dismemberment had occurred in the garden.

As of 13 September, the house remained cordoned off.

Interview of Atkins and Pereira

Having been taken to Bournemouth police station into custody, during the late afternoon and evening of 2 September and into 3 September, Pereira and Atkins were interviewed.Atkins provided a no comment interview, whilst Pereira gave several accounts over five and a half hours of interviews.Whilst in custody, Pereira was seen by medical professionals in relation to 'addiction issues', with treatment being possible to alleviate symptoms.

2 September

Pereira's first account

At approximately 17:02 BST on 2 September, Pereira's first interview began. In her first interview, she stated that she had know Shotton, who she knew as 'Rio', since around May or June 2023, when her and Atkins started taking crack cocaine again. She stated she knew him to be a crack and heroin user who had been involved in supplying those drugs to feed his habit. She stated she had known him for 'probably a few months' and that Shotton had visited the couples flat on one occasion to take drugs together.

She added that on one occasion, Shotton had been at the address smoking crack cocaine with the couple. She noted how she felt 'uneasy' when Shotton injected drugs in the bathroom. After this, she stated he left the address, however, left his phone behind. After not returning to collect it for ‘a few weeks’, she decided to sell it, as she had no money and on 18 August, she and Atkins 'wanted some crack'. She added that if she saw him again, it would only have cost her £20 to get the phone back.She stated she was agoraphobic, so didn't go out that much.

Pereira was shown pictures of the package where Shotton's legs were located on the zig zags. Pereira replied that she wouldn't be forensically linked to the tape or black bag when she was asked, but stated she had black bags and tape at her address that Atkins had told her he had been using to paint the utility room. She agreed that there was a similarity between the tape in the photos and the tape that Atkins had.

Pereira stated that she wasn’t aware that Shotton had been killed, had died or about any remains until she was told by police, not even watching the news regarding human remains being discovered on the zig zags.She stated that she had no role in the death or dismemberment of Shotton and didn't know who was responsible for his death, dismemberment or disposal of his remains. She added she wasn't present when he died and when asked whether she was protecting anyone, answered: "No, no, no". Police asked whether she was concerned whether Atkins was involved, to which Pereira stated whilst she had thought about it, stated she had thought that he 'wouldn't do anything like that'.

Pereira's second account

Approximately four hours after her first interview, Pereira was interviewed again, where she was informed that police had located Shotton’s arms. Pereira began the interview admitting that she had lied in her previous interview regarding Shotton having only stayed at her address for four hours, stating that he had in fact stayed at her flat for two nights, before then staying in a tent in the garden around the 18 August, having asked to stay due to falling out with someone. Pereira stated that Shotton didn't say much about the falling out, other than it being with someone he lived with and that he 'couldn't stay there no more'. Pereira stated that her and Atkins had the tent 'weeks' before meeting Shotton, telling police that they had a tent in the garden, as they were going to 'do the garden up' and then stay in the tent together.

Pereira stated that she, Atkins and Shotton were all 'getting along fine', with Atkins telling Shotton about God and how he'd been baptised, with his sins being washed away. She described that Shotton was: "A bit like, judgemental".

She stated that the last time she had seen Shotton was at the address, with him, her and Atkins taking drugs. Pereira stated that the drugs were from Shotton, with him keeping them within a 'little gold pot'. She then left the room to go to bed, with Shotton going outside to sleep in the tent after midnight, whilst Atkins remained on the sofa. Awaking at 11:00, Pereira stated that Shotton and all his belongings had disappeared. Entering the lounge, Atkins, still on the sofa and watching television, told her that Shotton had stayed outside all night in the tent and would be back that evening.

She added that she had noticed Atkins had been ‘burning stuff’ within the garden and that he had cuts on his fingers, but wasn't sure when this had occurred (a neighbour who Atkins later helped build a storage unit noticed a bandage on Atkins hand, which Atkins said was from an accident involving a chain saw in his garden). Pereira noticed that the fire pit had been used overnight but was no longer burning. Atkins told Pereira not to come outside, as he wanted to make the garden nice for her. Later in the day, Pereira stated she looked out the window and saw Atkins ‘sawing wood’ with a saw approximately 50cm x 20cm. She noted that the fire pit had also been used. Atkins made reference to burning some blue shoes he owned, stating that he was doing so as he didn’t like them. She saw that Atkins had large black bin liners, bleach and silver tape. Pereira stated that she thought Atkins was tidying up the garden, describing the scene as ‘lovely’.

Pereira added that later in the day, Atkins had gone shopping on quite a few occasions, stating that Atkins had wanted to get bleach and tape in order to paint the utility room. Pereira stated that Atkins bought bin linters and tape and she noted that the bin liners were larger than the ones they needed. Later, Pereira also went shopping, wanting chocolate from Poundland, as well as going to Cash Creators. Having sold Shotton's phone, Pereira stated that the pair used the money to buy drugs.

Having purchased the drugs, the pair returned to their address. Pereira told police that Atkins later spent further time in the afternoon burning things. She added that she hadn't been into the garden since the morning she checked on the tent where Shotton had stayed.

3 September

Covert recording of Atkins and Pereira's conversation in police van

Atkins and Pereira were covertly recorded discussing Shotton in a police van, en-route to Poole Magistrates' Court (pictured)

Requiring further time to interview Atkins and Pereira, police took the pair to Poole Magistrates’ Court on 3 September where an application for further detention was to be made under section 43 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

En-route to the court, Atkins and Pereira, who were placed in the same police van, which featured a covert listening device, had their conversations recorded. This also picked them up breaking wind on a number of occasions, which was thought to be a combination of drug withdrawal and the medication they were on. This was the first time since they had been able to speak to one another since their arrest.

Atkins was heard to tell Pereira that it was 'illegal' for the police to interview her whist she was withdrawing from methadone.

Atkins was heard to remark how just before the time of their arrest, they were about to leave when the police crashed through their gate. He asked Pereira if she knew why he had gone into the garden, with Pereira replying: “Did you have the legs there?”Atkins replied: “I went into the garden to get rid of the fucking arms”, before he was heard laughing. Pereira responded: “Yeah, I knew you were tryna...”

Later, Atkins was heard to tell Pereira to keep “playing that story out to the end”.

Having arrived outside of the court, Pereira later asked Atkins: “do you regret anything?” Atkins responded, stating: “I’ll look ‘em straight in the eye and say, yeah. I’d do it again and again and again. If you let me go today, I’d find another one and do it again. Drug dealers, and pushers. Kill, decapitate, and eat the fucker.”

Pereira told Atkins that police had taken samples from underneath her fingernails, with Atkins remarking that she wouldn’t have had anything there, with “the amount of bleach you used”. He told Pereira to answer any further questions with no comment.

Appearing at the magistrates’ court, the time was extended for questioning to continue.

Further interviews

In further interviews, Atkins continued to answer with no comment.

Pereira provides 'no comment'

At approximately 17:45 on 3 September, Pereira was interviewed for a third time. Police pointed out inconsistencies with her first two interviews and on begining to ask questions regarding the layout of her house and garden, Pereira began to answer with no comment to some of the questions asked. This included police asking Pereira about a 'towel wrapped package' within the garden. Pereira ignored the officer's questions, until responding when asked whether it smelt. She told police: "I will say I didn't smell anything". Police pointed out that a clump of hair had been located within the garden, which Pereira responded: "It looks like my hair, but I had nothing to do with that [discovery of Shotton's severed arms]. My hair gets everywhere. I empty out the hoover in the back garden, so you'd find more hair all around my garden. I can tell you that now." Having been told that Shotton's remains were found within a package leaning up against the back door of the utility room, Pereira responded that she didn't put the package there. Asked who had, she replied: "Not me", stating that she didn't know who had.

Pereira admits to a conversation in the police van

At this point, Pereira asked for a break to speak to her solicitor. Having had a short consultation with her solicitor, Pereira told police that she and Atkins had spoken in the back of the police van, noting how he was: "Fine, Absolutely fine. No emotion. Just saying that he loved me. That was it. No crying, nothing."

Pereira told police that Atkins had asked her what she had said in interview, with her telling him she wasn't allowed to talk to him about it. Atkins told her to answer with no comment, stating that he had told her he had spoken to his solicitor and that if she went 'no comment' alongside him, she would be put on remand, but only for around nine months.This included how she had asked Atkins whether he had killed Shotton, to which Atkins replied: “yeah”. She stated that Atkins had told her that God had told him to kill Shotton. She added that Atkins had told her he had asked his solicitor that if he admitted what he did, stating he cooked Shotton’s head and ate his cheeks, would that get Pereira ‘off the hook’, however, the solicitor had said it still wouldn't and that Pereira would still be charged. Pereira stated she wasn't sure whether Atkins had done what he had said, noting that he had been saying some 'weird stuff'. She remarked that Atkins had told her he needed to go 'in front of the big courts' and that when he did, he would admit that: "I've done it".

Pereira told police that Atkins had told her that he had "got rid of him [Shotton]", after riding a bike to Shelley Manor, a pharmacy in Boscombe, where he killed Shotton. Pereira stated that she told Atkins she didn't want to know, with Atkins repeating that he loved her. She added that Atkins had gone to the Manor Steps zig zag and put packages containing Shotton's legs there, placing them near the footpath where someone would find them, due to them being decomposed. She told police that Atkins had told her not to worry and that everything would be fine, with him telling 'big court' about it.

Pereira told police: "I'm just really scared. He was my partner. I can't be with someone that's killed someone. I cant. I fucking can't", as well as saying: "I can't be with a fucking murderer. I can't be with a fucking murderer, Jesus".

When asked what she knew, had seen and what she'd done in recent weeks, Pereira told police that she had in fact been out, had been meeting Shotton and that he had been staying with her and Atkins, admitting to lying about what she had said in previous interviews. Pereira stated that Shotton had stayed at her address for two weeks before his death from the beginning of August. She stated that between 08:00 or 09:00 BST until 20:00 or 21:00 BST, Shotton would sell drugs and that he was being "worked fucking hard". Originally, Atkins had told Shotton that he could stay with him and Pereira after he was kicked out of the derelict on Manor Road. B&B Pereira stated that she knew Atkins didn’t like Shotton or the arrangement of him living at the address on the agreement he sorted the couple drugs; Atkins felt as if Shotton was not giving the couple enough drugs in exchange for being allowed to stay at their address, noting how Atkins didn't like how Shotton was: "Just taking the piss with the drugs", not paying them enough. She noted that whilst he would 'sort' her and Atkins out 'a bit' [with drugs], some nights he arrived and said he couldn't. She stated that he'd then be up all of the night using drugs himself.

Pereira added that she only discovered Atkins had killed Shotton earlier that morning, when he told her in the police van. She told police how on asking Atkins what the cuts on his hands were from, that he had told her it was due to a fight that he had with Shotton in the garden of the address. She stated she noticed these injuries, as well as a big bruise on Atkins ribs a few days before the time she finally saw Shotton. Pereira told police that there had been a few arguments between Shotton and Atkins, but she had not witnessed any physical arguments or fights. She added that Atkins had previously asked Shotton to leave the address.

She told police that Shotton was waiting to be picked up by a friend, a drug dealer, who would be arriving in his van to collect Shotton. She noted that this was approximately three or four days before she sold Shotton's phone.

Pereira changed her account again, stating that the last time she saw Shotton was in the living room, where Atkins had began to shout at him for not giving enough drugs. She later stated that when Atkins drank: "He can be not very nice." Pereira stated that Atkins and Shotton were having words and how she had kept quiet, noting she had told Atkins that: "The men have gotta deal with it." She stated that Shotton 'looked scared' and that she had told him he had to go. She noted that Shotton had said that: "He always wants more", in relation to Atkins wanting more drugs from him as part of the arrangement. She added how Atkins had walked into the room, asking Shotton: "Where's out bits", with Shotton ignoring him. Shotton was sat on the other side of a sofa, before Atkins stood over him, shouting that Shotton had to be gone by the morning. This resulted in Pereira pulling Atkins away, telling him to calm down, before the couple went to bed together. In the morning, Pereira stated she awoke to find that Shotton had gone and Atkins told her that Shotton's friend had collected him, describing Atkins as appearing 'agitated'.

She added that Atkins didn't have cuts on his hand at that point, with Pereira noticing these around a day or two afterwards. Pereira added that one morning, she had asked Atkins where the cuts on his hands were from, with him stating they had been caused by him cutting wood in the garden and burning fires. She told police that Atkins didn't want her in the garden due to him causing fires and that she couldn't see what he was doing as she was inside with the door shut, not wanting smoke to enter her address.

Police asked Pereira that between Shotton going missing and her discovering the cuts on Atkins' hands, how many times there had been a fire or how long a fire was burning for. Pereira replied: "About five days". She stated that whilst she couldn't see him chopping wood, she had heard him sawing, having returned from Wilkinsons with a saw, approximately a day or two after Shotton had left.

Within her interview, Pereira stated she heard Atkins sawing in the garden, hearing him around a couple of days after Shotton had left. She added that she had heard Atkins 'sawing and sawing' up to around Monday or Tuesday. She denied any involvement in Shotton’s death or the dismemberment or concealment of his body, later adding that she hadn't witnessed or played any part in this, including storing or disposing of his remains. She stated that Shotton's remains hadn't been stored within the tent in the garden or utility room and that she didn't know both where he had been dismembered or where the rest of his remains were.

Pereira added that on that day, Atkins had purchased bin liners to clear the garden and tape for him to use whilst painting the utility room. She added that he had also purchased bleach, as well as disinfectant, as she liked to put it with her washing. Alongside these items, Atkins had also bough sweets, chocolate and M&M's.

Pereira stated that she hadn't been in the utility room around this time and hadn't been able to see within it, as Atkins had put up a towel over the door, telling her that he was going to paint it and make a surprise for her.

Pereira added that Atkins was 'always out there' [in the garden] and had caused a number of fires, telling police that they could check this with her neighbour.

Police, having spoken to neighbours, found that there had been a number of bonfires around the time of Shotton's death. One neighbour stated that in late August, the week before the police arrested Atkins and Pereira, they had noticed a 'strange bonfire' and 'noises of a chainsaw'. One neighbour stated that one bonfire had an ‘awful, putrid smell’ on two evenings between 26 and 29 August, whilst another smelt a bonfire on 19 August that they thought smelt of ‘burning flesh’, later finding that between approximately 21 and 25 August, his wheelie bings smelt like 'off meat', as if 'someone had put off meat in the bin'. On a day between 23 to 25 August, Atkins had asked that neighbour to borrow some magnolia paint, stating that his nephew had been drawing on the walls and he wanted to paint over the drawing.

Another neighbour stated that on a day 'between August 24 and 29', he had arrived home from work at around 19:00 BST, whereby over the next hour, he could hear a person sawing and could hear 'several loud cracks'. Having heard a cracking sound, the neighbour saw a male throwing something onto a fire pit. They assumed it was furniture that had been broken up, but didn't see any furniture in the garden.

Another neighbour stated that a bonfire had been alight between 27 and 31 August.

Another person, visiting a neighbour immediately next door to Atkins and Pereira stated that during August, he had noticed Atkins had lit a bonfire that was lit continuously for approximately 3 to 4 days, asking the neighbour he was visiting as to what they were burning. He noticed a smell of petrol that was ‘overwhelming’ and later an ‘awful smell’, liked 'some sort of decomposing animal or body' causing him to shout over the fence to Atkins as to what he was burning. Atkins replied that he was burning a dead fox which he’d located.

Asked about the events of the day that Shotton's phone had been sold, just after 17:30 BST on 18 August, Pereira stated that she had been out with Atkins to the pharmacy, but was unsure whether it was her pharmacy or his, adding she was 'guessing'. She stated that she thought they had gone to the Poundshop and Poundstretcher before going to Cash Creators, where having sold Shotton's mobile phone, had both gone to score drugs.

In relation to the phone, Pereira stated that Atkins had told her that he had found it after Shotton had left. Pereira stated that she hadn't sold or gotten rid of any other items belonging to Shotton.

Pereira stated that over the following weeks, of exactly two weeks and two days, between Shotton's iPhone being sold and her and Atkins' arrest, she and Atkins hadn't spent a lot of time together, with Atkins spending time in the garden. She added that Atkins had been 'talking a lot about God', remarking how: "God makes him do this, God makes him do that", describing this as: "Very weird". She added that Atkins had previously told her that God had told him to get rid of all the drug dealers as: "They're all evil".

She stated that during the time, Atkins had been burning stuff for 'most days' and that she had been in the utility room on one occasion to do washing, but hadn't noticed anything in the room.

Regarding a pair of Atkins' trainers that she had mentioned in a previous interview, Pereira stated that Atkins had told her he needed to get rid of them as he didn't like them anymore. Pereira stated that she thought that they were still in her address, despite having told police she thought he had burnt them, when interviewed the day previously. She added that the reason for this was that she couldn't be sure, adding that Atkins may have burnt the shoes or that they still may be in her address.

After a short break, police told Pereira that they were concerned that she still hadn't told them the 'whole truth', having provided a third version of events within the last two days. They added how Pereira was 'witholding things' and how there were things that didn't 'tally up'. They stated that Pereira's credibility had been 'dimished somewhat' by her accounts changing. Pereira agreed, adding: "But this morning I actually got to speak to Benny [Atkins], which was different.

Police challenge Pereira on her accounts

A railway footbridge at the beginning of one end of St Clement's Road, where it meets with Palmerston Road, Boscombe

Going over events, police stated that they had established with Pereira that the night Shotton went missing, Pereira had told them that Atkins had been with her and they'd slept together in bed, before she had woken up the next morning to find him making a cup of tea. However, police then showed CCTV from a camera showing the view along Walpole Road towards Boscombe Crescent, of a person on a bike, leaving Randolph Road. The rider takes the bike through the Crescent, along Christchurch Road, turning left into Palmerston Road, before going up towards Saint Clements Road. Pereira stated that she didn't know who the person was, before seeing footage from another camera and stating that it was Atkins. Police confirmed that it was him, from tattoos visible on his arms. The CCTV showed Atkins on the bike, out at 04:23 BST on the early hours of the morning. Police told Pereira that further footage showed Atkins meeting with someone else, before going through town and back to Pereira's address. They challenged Pereira, stating that he hadn't spent the night in bed with her and that she 'knew that'.

Police put it to Pereira that Atkins already had Shotton's mobile phone and had been using it to make calls, which was the same handset that Pereira had admit to putting her SIM card into, days later. Pereira stated again that Atkins had told her that he had found it. Police challenged Pereira again, stating: "But you know he hasn't found it. You know he's taken that from Simon when Simon's been killed". Pereira replied: "No, I didn't."

Police put further CCTV to Pereira, of her in Cash Creators, with the couple both sweating. She was asked to account what she was doing and told police that she was selling Shotton's phone. However, police tell her that she wasn't selling the phone, as given the timing, this occurred five and a half hours later. Pereira stated that she was selling a power bank, but police tell her that she was selling two 'deck things' that they had found. Police asked where the items (a hot glue gun and solder) were from. Pereira stated that they belonged to Shotton and that he had left them at the address. Police reminded Pereira that they had asked her this earlier, with Pereira stating: "I know, and I forgot". Police told her that it was another opportunity and time where Pereira had not told the truth, adding that it was another example of police going through evidence, revealing more information, only for Pereria to alter her account. They added that it meant that it was less likely for the police to believe her, with the evidence now saying otherwise as well.

Police asked Pereira whether her and Atkins had returned to the derelict B&B where Shotton was previously staying to collect his property and sell it, to which Pereira denied, telling them to check CCTV.

Police then spoke to Pereira about what could be heard on CCTV at Cash Creators. Police stated that in their opinion that the name 'Peter' or the word 'people' is heard, before: "They don't know what happened to him. They ain't got a fucking clue". Pereira denied this was what could be heard, stating that she had heard something about keys. Police put it to her that she and Atkins were talking about the murder of Shotton. Pereira responded: "No no no no no no no no. I'm not having that."

Police then put more CCTV to Pereira, from a camera looking across from St John's Road, into Boscombe Crescent. They tell Pereira that the footage is from 09:38 BST on the morning of 18 August, three hours before the couple are in Cash Creators selling Shotton's soldering gun and ten hours before they sell his iPhone. A male is seen to appear from Aylesbury Road, appearing to be carrying a bin bag or sack, with something rectangular within it. Pereira confirmed to police that the man was Atkins. Police asked what he was doing and when Pereira replied that she didn't know, they retorted: "You do know though, that's the problem". Pereira replied: "I don't know. I don't. I don't", before police tell her: "I don't think that's good enough anymore I'm afraid Debs." Pereira responded, stating: "No, I don't know. I'm not a fucking murderer. I'm not a murderer, I don't help people murder people. I'm not a murderer." Police put it to Pereira that even if she's not killed Shotton, she has helped and was in the flat when Shotton was killed, which Pereira denied.

Police referred to a text that Shotton to Atkins regarding him having money by the time he got back home that now put a 'completely different spin' on Pereira's account for the relationship and behaviour between her, Atkins and Shotton. Pereira agreed but stated that it was nothing to do with her, but Atkins.

Police put it to Pereira that her and Atkins had been ripping Shotton off for drugs, building up a debt and letting him down and that this was the reason for a 'violent incident' occurring, where Shotton was killed. Pereira denied all of this.

Police put it to Pereira that she was covering for Atkins, minimising her role and knowledge of what occurred. Pereira responded: "I'm not covering for him. I fucking said like there he's told me that he's fucking done this."

Police referred to texts from Shotton's mobile in which he had arranged with friends to stay elsehwere, implying that he didn't want Atkins and Pereira to know he was going. Police told Pereira that it was the exact opposite of what she had told them, with Pereira agreeing, but stating that in the beginning, she had got along with Shotton. Police stated that it was a 'completly different dynamic' to the one that Pereira had presented, adding that there was upset with Shotton, yet it seemed he was upset with them and that when being asked to leave, he was attempting to make arrangements to do so. Pereira stated that it was Atkins who was asking him to leave and not her, where police have reminded her that she had told them that she had told them that she wanted Shotton to leave. Pereira agreed, before stating that it was Atkins that in the end, really wanted Shotton to go.

Police tell Pereira that she knew and was present when Shotton was murdered, before she played a part in 'destroying, concealing evidence' and 'disposing on his remains'. Pereira denied all of this.

Police continued, stating that Atkins had returned to the address close to the time Shotton was killed, had an argument over money and their relationship, Pereira stealing drugs and Shotton being taken advantage of, before Shotton was killed. After this, police told Pereira they thought she was in the flat when this occurred and that Shotton's body had been stored and cut up at the address. They asked Pereira where she had kept Shotton's remains from the time of his death to his legs being disposed at the Overcliff. Pereira stated: "I haven't had nothing to do with that". Police continued, adding that Shotton's arms were located by the back door of her address. Pereira told police she didn't know where Shotton's head and torso were when asked.

Police stated that if Pereira hadn't murdered Shotton or laid a finger on him, then the evidence suggested that she was present and within the flat when he had been killed. Pereira challenged this, stating that she would have heard the murder take place, with police stating that she would have seen it. Asking how, police replied: "Because it's in your one bed flat. Benny's [Atkins] come home after 8 o'clock, there's been an argument and Simon's been killed. Again, Pereira denied this.

Regarding Pereira telling police she hadn't been going into the garden or into the utility room, police challenged Pereira that Shotton had been in the utility room 'the whole time', which she denied. She denied that he had been dismembered in the address, but police retorted that it was highly unlikely that Atkins had 'carried a dead man down the street' and dismembered Shotton elsewhere. Pereira stated: "But I would have know if it was in my utility room", with police telling her: "If you've not actively played a part in the murder of Simon, it's impossible for you not to have played a part in the covering up of his murder and disposal of his body". Again, Pereira denied knowing anything about this. Police told Pereira: "You've perverted the course of justice. You and Benny have done some horrific things to Simon after his brutal death. That is the only explanation." Pereira replied: "No, no."

Police told Pereira: "Simon is a man who at some stage you got along with. He's going to have relatives who, if nothing else, deserve to know what's happened to the rest of his body." Pereira replied: "And I don't know. I promise you, I don't know. I don't know." The interview is then concluded.

4 September

Atkins and Pereira are charged with murder

On 4 September, Atkins and Pereira were charged with Shotton's murder, perverting the course of justice and preventing the burial of a corpse. They appeared at Poole magistrates' court the following day.

6 September

Discovery of torso

The seafront entrance to the gardens, where a suitcase containing Shotton's headless torso was discovered in a hedgerow

On 6 September, police were continuing a massive search operation in order to locate Shotton’s missing torso and head. Their searches expanded from the original scene to the wider Bournemouth area, including Boscombe Chine Gardens, where a police licensed search team searched undergrowth.

Whilst there, at approximately 10:53 BST, an officer walking on the left hand side of the path on a raised embankment smelt a faint smell, of which he 'recognised the distinctive smell of death'. Whilst searching the immediate area, he couldn't find the cause of the smell, before he stepped onto another raised embankment, where he could smell 'death' intermittently.

Having notified his team leader what he could smell and the area it was emanating from, the officer saw a black bag within a hedgerow. Entering the hedgerow by approximately 1 metre, the officer saw flies on and surrounding a black suitcase. On retrieving the suitcase by pulling it out by its wheels, the officer faced a 'stench of death' that was 'immediate and intense'. On further looking at the suitcase, it looked as it if contained something heavy and the bottom of the case was wet, with maggots and eggs on it.

Crime Scene Investigators (CSI) arrived at the scene and discovered a headless human torso, that was packaged within the suitcase.

Having discovered the further remains of Shotton, police appealed to the public as to anyone who had seen someone with a black suitcase or anyone who saw suspicious activity in the area between 18 August and 1 September.

The vicinity where Shotton's torso was found had previously been the same location of another killing, when James Cutting was stabbed to death on 30 June, 2020.

18 February

Walpole Lane, Boscombe, where fragments of Shotton's skull were discovered

At a hearing at Winchester Crown Court on 18 February, Atkins provided a defence statement. He claimed that Shotton had attacked him with a bread knife, with Atkins grabbing the knife and, as a result, sustained a wound to his right hand. During this attack, Atkins claimed that the pair tussled and wrestled with the bread knife, with Atkins sustaining a second wound to his left hand, above his wrist. Atkins admitted to burning Shotton’s head and disposing 'fragments' on Walpole Lane, an alleyway near to Aylesbury Road. Representatives of Atkins provided police a number of images that identified garages on Walpole Lane at which Atkins was said to have deposited part of Shotton's skull.

28 February

Discovery of skull fragments

On 28 February, police carried out a search of Walpole Lane in Boscombe, where they discovered what may have been 'fragments' of a skull. The size of the fragments were such that a detective later noted 'a normal person walking along the road would probably miss them'. It was reported that 'some items' were located near to garages, which were sent for analysis, which found some to be human bone. All of Shotton's head has never been recovered.

Post mortem and other scientific investigations

Pathologist evaluation

Dr Deborah Cook, a Home Office registered pathologist, conducted post mortem examinations on Shotton's remains. These took place at various times (due to Shotton's remains being located over various weeks and months), with Dr Cook's final report being prepared on 27 October, 2023. Dr Cook wasn't able to provide a definitive time of death.

Two post mortem examinations were undertaken, firstly of the legs, before a further examination of the arms and torso. Samples were also taken from the suitcases, packages and tape that had been used to conceal the body parts, with Dr Cook having attended the scene of where Shotton's legs were discovered. These were found to have been contaminated with 'decompositional fluid, fatty deposits and maggots'.

Dr Cook found that there was nothing that indicated Shotton had died of natural causes and that the amputations had occurred after death. She added that there was no identifiable injury to Shotton’s torso that would have caused his death.

Examination of legs

On 27 August, 2023, during the post mortem examination of the legs, the Dr Cook determined that they appeared to be from the same person (Shotton) and that the amputations appeared amateur, indicating that the removal of the legs was not done as part of surgery or something that had 'come out of an operating theatre', noting that the nature of the cutting marks were 'not correct'. Dr Cook could only conclude that she had seen the use of a saw in dismemberment before. The points at where Shotton's legs had been removed meant that they were cut through skin, muscle and bone.

Dr Cook found that the loss of skin and maggots around Shotton's left leg was 'natural with decomposition', indicating that an amputation hadn't occurred the day before. On Shotton's left leg, Dr Cook noted that very close to a cut line where the skin ended, there were a 'number of short parallel in sized cuts', something that had been made with a knife, determining that it was this instrument that had been used to cut through the skin and muscle, but that this wouldn't have been a sort available in a kitchen. Whilst Dr Cook wasn't able to provide further detail about how Shotton's muscle had been divided, she noted that it 'wasn't entirely clean', with 'striations and notching' on the bone, in addition to the end that had been cut.

Dr Cook provided similar findings having examined Shotton's right leg, adding how there were 'fine scratch marks on the bone', which showed that 'a knife had glided across the surface of the bone but hadn't gone through it deeply'.

Examination of torso

Dr Cook established that the decapitation wound started from the front around to the back and was 'not a single clean path of the knife', therefore meaning it would not have been 'just one cut'. The cut was above the windpipe and gullet, with a skin flap that measured 6cm indicating that there hadn't been a clear cut through. However, the spine had been cut directly through a bone, not the disk space.

Regarding Shotton's torso, Dr Cook confirmed that there were fluids on the suitcase that it had been located within, indicating 'bodily decomposition', with a 'number of maggots' also present within

On Shotton's back were two incised wounds, two superficial cuts, one superficial incised cut and one incised cut. In total, Shotton had 12 sharp force injuries to his torso, clustered at the top back of his left shoulder. Five of these penetrated through Shotton's skin.

A cut had been made close to Shotton's collarbone, which Dr Cook stated may have been caused at the same time Shotton's head was removed, however, she couldn't be certain that this hadn't been caused 'in an incident around the time of death'.

Dr Cook noted an injury at the top of Shotton's shoulder, with the wound running from front to back. The wound passed into the muscle that curves up the top of the shoulder, but was less than 1cm deep, with no 'vital structures' at the location. Dr Cook determined that it was an incised wound that had been made by a bladed weapon, such as a knife. Also at the top of Shotton's shoulder was a superficial incised cut, which had also been made with a bladed weapon that was 'probably' a knife. This wound hadn't broken through the full thickness of the skin and didn't go into the muscle. Dr Cook noted a skin flap around the area, which had been caused by a knife that had 'raised up the skin'. Due to the amount of decomposition, Dr Cook wasn't able to determine whether these injuries had been caused before or after Shotton had died. However, comparing the injuries with the general healing process of wounds, Dr Cook was 'confident' that the wounds had been caused through an incident around the time Shotton had died or immediately after he had been killed. She determined that a knife or blade had entered parallel to Shotton's head.

Shotton also had two wounds on the upper part and left side of his back, between the neck and the tip of the shoulder. These were incised wounds, both of which went into the muscle. Dr Cook established that the wounds, no more than 3cm in depth, wouldn't be fatal. She found that a knife blade would have entered parallel to Shotton's head or 'front to back'.

On the left side of the back of Shotton's neck was an incised wound that had been made with a bladed weapon or knife, which Dr Cook determined was too close to the amputation of the head for her to provide details about the depth of the wound.

Due to their position, all but one of the wounds were not capable of having been caused by Shotton himself. It appeared that Shotton had been repeatedly stabbed multiple times with a small, sharp object.

Examination of arms

The arms had also been sawn off, in the middle of the shafts of long bones that attached each limb. There were no needle marks on the arms.

At the top of Shotton's right arm was a superficial cut, with the cut in the tissues underneath the skin, but not as far as muscle. Dr Cook described this as a 'sharp cut', that could have been caused by a knife.

On Shotton’s right hand was a 8.5cm slash mark across his palm, penetrating 4cm into the muscle, as well as a number of other smaller cuts. Shotton’s left wrist and hand contained a number of slash and cut injuries, with some having cut into the bones of the finger.

On Shotton's left arm, there was one superficial cut close to Shotton's wrist. Shotton had multiple wounds on his left hand, with five incised wounds, two parallel incised wounds, two deep incised wounds, two incised wounds, three single cuts and a possible incision. The deepest of all these wounds was a deep incised wound on Shotton's middle finger, that had cut into the bone.

The injuries to Shotton's hands were determined by Dr Cook to be 'defence type injuries' consistent of a person attempting to defend themselves against someone attacking them with a knife. Dr Cook stated that the injury applied to the cut on the forearm, stating that 'if a knife comes towards you, you use the arm to shield yourself'. Dr Cook stated that with the number of injuries that Shotton had, it didn't indicate that he had only grabbed the knife once. However, these injuries could also, in theory, have been caused by a person injuring themselves with their hand slipping onto a blade. Dr Cook stated that of the wounds, a person would not bleed to death.

Forensic scientist evaluation

Examination of bone fragments

A forensic scientist concluded that 69 fragments they were provided with from Walpole Lane were bones. In his opinion,15 of these were consistent with human bone, 6 were not human and the species couldn't be determined from 48 fragments. Of the bones identified as being from a human, these were from the cranium, however, the majority of the cranium, including the most robust part which would normally survive exposure from fire, weren't present. The forensic scientist thought that the other fragments he thought were likely human showed signs of being exposed to heat. Out of all the pieces located, only two could be matched.

Examination of dismemberment methods

The type of saw that was used to cut up Shotton's body

A forensic scientist, who had expertise in the dismemberment of bodies and methods used to cut bones was provided with ends of Shotton's bones, where there had been cuts. These were from Shotton's neck and each arm and thigh. The forensic scientist was able to establish that the bones had been cut with a saw. They thought that the left leg had been cut from the back to the front, with the right leg having been cut from the side of the thigh through to the inner leg. The forensic scientist wasn't able to say the exact direction of the cutting of Shotton's arms.

Shotton's right femur, that was attached to his torso, had a series of grooves in several directions, indicating ten partial attempts to cut through the bone. There was a saw mark to Shotton's vertebrae in his neck, with the orientation determining that the cutting had been made from the front to the back of Shotton's neck.

It was noted that there were partial cuts into the bone, leaving a groove, which usually occurred prior to a 'main cut' being started. From that, it was determined that the type of saw had 'non pointed teeth like a hacksaw'.

The forensic scientist looked for details, such as the shape, tooth spacing and profile of the teeth of the blade and determined that the saw blade had a TPI (tooth per inch) of 24. This matched the a red saw, that police seized from Wilkos and that had been given to the forensic scientist, alongside a wood saw that had been seized from Atkins and Pereira's home address. Bone marks at the dismemberment sites on the bones were compared to the teeth on this type of hacksaw that Atkins or Pereira had stolen from Wilko on 19 August, with the forensic scientist being of the opinion that it was this type of Wilko saw, not the wood saw, that had been used to dismember Shotton's body.

Trial

Winchester Crown Court

Atkins and Pereira’s trial started on 11 April 2024 at Winchester Crown Court.

The prosecution case was given by Paul Calvin KC and Sam Barker.For the defence, Zafar Ali KC represented Atkins, whilst Ignatius Hughes KC represented Pereira.

Atkins admitted to perverting the course of justice and preventing the burial of a corpse. On October 20, 2023, at a first full hearing at Bournemouth Crown Court, Atkins made what was described as a ‘clear and unambiguous’ admission that he was responsible for killing Shotton, as well as dismembering and disposing of his body parts. However, despite admitting responsibility, Atkins brought up a ‘potential issue’ of self defence and denied murder.

Pereira denied all three charges.

Cases

Prosecution case

The Crown’s case was that Shotton was killed inside 18B Aylesbury Road, on the morning of 18 August 2023, with both Atkins and Pereira being present. They stated that at the time, both defendants were awake and that the flat was of such a small size that neither of the defendants could have been unaware as to what the other was doing. The alleged it was ‘common sense’ that both must have been involved in Shotton’s murder and his subsequent dismemberment and the disposal of his body parts.

In reference to the bonfires, the prosecution alleged that Atkins was burning Shotton’s clothes and belongings, as well as his head.

The prosecution alleged that Shotton had been killed and dismembered inside the flat, namely the utility room, due to the amount of blood located. They didn’t believe it was conducted in the garden, due to no evidence of significant blood loss and given that it would have had to have occurred in view of all the neighbours.

The prosecution alleged that it appeared Shotton’s body was disposed of in stages. They alleged that the arms were packaged but still at the address on 1 September. Once Shotton’s legs were discovered on 26 August, the case was reported in both local and national news, meaning it would have been risky for the defendants to wander around the town to deposit the remaining body parts.

Defence case

Ali explained to the jury that Atkins had pleaded guilty to dismembering and concealing Shotton’s body, with the jury’s only focus being on the charge of murder, given the previously mentioned ‘potential issue’ of self defence that Atkins had raised at an early hearing.

Ali stated that Atkins case was that at all times, he had been acting in lawful self defence, relating to Shotton’s death.

Timeline of trial

Prosecution case

Day 1 - Thursday 11 April

The trial started, including the selection and swearing in of the jury. The jury were informed of the charges against Atkins and Pereira of murder, perverting the course of justice, and preventing the burial of a corpse. The prosecution opened with their speech, before the defence speech followed.

Evidence then began, with a statement being read out from the woman who discovered the package containing Shotton's leg. A statement was then read from a Dorset Police officer who attended the scene.

Day 2 - Friday 12 April

The first prosecution witness, a police officer from Dorset Police, who was called to the scene and discovered Shotton's legs, gave evidence.

A statement from a police sergeant was read out, who also attended the scene and located the second package with Shotton's other leg within. A statement from the forensic scientist who matched the DNA of the severed legs to Shotton was also read out.

A probation officer, who was responsible for managing Shotton whilst he was on license, also took the witness stand, along with a man who was associated with the B&B property that Shotton was squatting at.

Day 3 - Monday 15 April

A prosecutor took the jury through a folder of documents and evidence they had been provided, before a major crime analyst gave evidence, regarding data recovered from Shotton's iPhone as well as evidence on CCTV footage.

The female friend of Shotton, who he had text about his stress of living at Atkins and Pereira's property, also gave evidence. The male friend, who Shotton had arranged to collect him and his belongings from the address on the day he was killed, also gave evidence.

A statement from a member of staff at Cash Creators who served Atkins and Pereira was also read out, before a police sergeant from the major crime investigation team gave evidence relating to CCTV footage from the shop.

Day 4 - Tuesday 16 April

Two Dorset Police officers, who arrested Atkins and Pereira at their home address gave evidence, as well as their body-worn video camera footage that captured the arrests being played to the jury.

A statement was read from a Crime Scene Investigator who conducted a forensic examination at the address between September 2 and 9 and who located Shotton's severed arms.

A detective from the major crime team introduced the jury to the interview process. Atkins gave 'no comment' to questions asked across his first three interviews, whereas Pereira gave differing accounts. The first two interviews between police and Pereira were played in full to the jury.

Day 5 - Wednesday 17 April

The covert audio recording that captured conversations between Atkins and Pereira was plated to the court. The jury asked the judge whether a transcript of this recording would be made available, however, the judge explained that this would not happen, as the prosecution and defence disagreed on what had been said.

Pereira's third police interview was played, where police challenge the accounts she had given.The prosecution then went through CCTV and photographs with the jury, including CCTV that alledgedly showed Atkins after the murder, and photographs including of Pereira after her arrest, Atkin's hands, the scene at Manor Steps zig zag, the scene at Aylesbury Road, including the utility room and a layout plan of the Atkins and Pereira's flat.

Day 6 - Thursday 18 April

A forensic expert gave evidence regarding forensics, including blood and DNA that was located at the address. They were then cross-examined by the defence, with the forensic expert confirming that a lifestyle of a drug user may mean that they shed blood for various reasons and that it was possible that a user of a certain type of drug tended to be sweatier than a non-drug user. The defence questioned the reliability of the DNA and blood analysis in proving how it got onto an item or surface, stating that there were many ways that DNA matches could have got there.

The jury also heard from a forensic scientist, whose specialism was interpreting blood patterning at scenes, as well as had a statement read out from a police sergeant who discovered Shotton's torso. They were also shown further CCTV, showing Atkins and Pereira on the day after Shotton's death, where they appear to have stolen a saw from a shop.

The jury heard from a forensic scientist, with an area of his expertise being in the dismemberment of bodies and methods used to cut bones.

Day 7 - Monday 22 April

The jury were taken by coach to visit 18B Aylesbury Road, being shown the garden where Shotton's arms were located and the utility room that the prosecution alleged was where Shotton was dismembered with a saw.

Returning to the court, the jury were read a statement from a member of staff who was employed at Wilko within the Sovereign Centre in Boscombe, who noted that the footage showing a saw on the handle bars of a bike Atkins was pushing was the same type of saw that they stocked. He added that having completed a stock check, it was found that one saw was missing and that it was thought it had been stolen in the 'last month' at the time the stock check was completed.

The jury also heard a statement from a fellow drug user, who had last seen Shotton at the end of July. As the witness couldn't be traced, it could therefore not be tested in court, with the statement not being accepted. Ali told the court that if the witness was present, he would have: "Investigated the extent of the drugs operation" and the witnesses involvement.

Day 8 - Tuesday 23 April

A number of neighbours and a person who visited Aylesbury Road, who had noted fires or had interactions with Atkins and/or Pereira, either appeared at the court or had their statements read.

Home Office pathologist, Dr Cook also appeared. Questioned by Ali, Dr Cook was of the opinion that Atkins injuries on his hands could be consistent with self defence injuries, regarding Atkins' claim that Shotton had attacked him with a knife, before Shotton died. Dr Cook accepted that it was a possibility that Atkins had obtained his injuries from warding away a knife. This was also the case for Shotton, with his injuries being compatible with having grasped on to a knife.

Questioned by Cavin, Dr Cook noted that Atkins injuries could also have been caused by a potential of slipping onto a blade when dismembering a body.

Day 9 - Wednesday 24 April

The jury were handed documents of agreed facts by prosecutors.

This included telephone evidence and data that had been recovered from Shotton's phone and a phone that Atkins and Pereira shared, analysis of bone fragments, and Atkins and Pereira's previous convictions. The jury also had additional questions regarding some of the agreed facts.

The crown then concluded their case.

Defence case

On the thirteenth day of the trial, the defence case began, on 30 April. This followed the jury not attending on the tenth and eleventh day of the trial, in order for legal discussion to take place. The defence case was meant to start on the twelfth day of the trial on 29 April, however, due to 'legal issues', this did not commence.

Day 13 - Tuesday 30 April

Pereira was questioned about her life and relationship with Atkins, before asking to recount how she met Shotton and the events that led up to his death and the aftermath of his killing.

Hughes asked Pereira why she didn't contact police after Shotton's death. Pereira explained that Atkins: "...Had this way of controlling me, I felt like I had to be loyal to him." She added: "He'd always ask me, 'if I did anything stupid, would I grass him up?' and I'd say 'no', but I'd never in a millions years thought he'd end up murdering someone. I just wanted to be accepted and loved by him."

Pereira was also asked about CCTV from Wilko in Boscombe on August 19, showing her and Atkins inside the store. She told the jury that Atkins told her he was going to get a saw and that he was responsible for stealing it.

Pereira told the jury that she hadn't witnessed Atkins dismembering Shotton but that Atkins had told her he'd 'done it' out in the garden, noting how Atkins had said he was going to 'chop up' Shotton's body and 'put it in the sea so the fishes could eat it.'

Pereira was asked about lying in her police interviews, to which she stated she had done so "through fear" and "not being believed" if she was to tell the truth. She added that: "Benny [Atkins] would take me through what to say if we'd get questioned, or what to do if the police turned up."

With Hughes having concluded his questions for Pereira, the court took a 30 minute break for Ali to speak with Atkins.

Later, Ali started his cross examination of Pereira, challenging inconsistencies from her amended defence statement that was provided to the court on the first day of the trial, to the evidence she had given earlier that morning. This included details about the way the fight had occurred in the flat.

Day 14 - Wednesday 1 May

Pereira was due to be cross-examined, however, the judge told the jury that she would be going 'back to rest' for the day. This was due to Pereira's prison transport being delayed, with Pereira facing a long journey in cramped conditions, having had go to another court on the way, which incurred "a big detour". The judge explained that Pereira didn't feel up for cross examination on the day, but told the jury: "Blame me if you want to blame anyone, but it's certainly not Ms Pereira's fault."