Draft:Georgeism
| Submission declined on 17 January 2024 by Lopifalko (talk). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Georgeism[edit]
Georgism is considered a social act
The word Georgeism is Mainly used to describe a person who is indifferent to most topics but shows great interest in the conversation when the conversation reaches certain topics (especially pornographic topics)
The word Georgeism is said come from a person named George Chou
The adjective variants[edit]
Georgelised: Georgelised is generally used to describe a person becoming more and more Georges, that is, not interested in most topics, but increasingly interested in certain topics.
"You are Georgelised, you are not even paying attantion to our conversation"